Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Michael Harris v. Extra Space Storage, LLC”
ACCEPTED 15-25-00020-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/6/2025 4:37 PM No. 15-25-00020-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Harris v. Remington Arms Companypublic domain
FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 18, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3
Michael J. DeLitta v. Nancy Schaeferpublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-15-00280-CV 6142048 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Matiella v. Murdock Street LLCpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHARLES MATIELLA Plaintiff, v. MURDOCK STREET LLC, et al., Defendants. Case No. 21-cv-2112 (GMH) MURDOCK STREET, LLC, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. EWORA, L.L.C., et al., T
Parsons Evergreene, LLCpublic domain
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) Parsons Evergreene, LLC ) ASBCA No. 58634 ) Under Contract No. FA8903-04-D-8703 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Douglas S. Oles, Esq. James F. Nagle, Esq.
Stromness Mpo, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
Trial; Lease Agreement; Fifth Amendment Taking; Holdover Tenancy; Contract Interpretation; Breach of Contract; United States Postal Service; Reformation. OPINION HORN, J. Plaintiff, Stromness MPO, LLC (Stromness MPO), filed a complaint in the United States Court of Federal Claims alleging that the United States Postal Service (US
Thomas Overby, Jr. v. Anheuser-Busch, LLCpublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 25-1520 Doc: 87 Filed: 06/15/2026 Pg: 1 of 18 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25-1520 THOMAS E. OVERBY, JR., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; ABBY GEARHART, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
Yesh Music, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER COGAN, District Judge. Plaintiffs are the owners of publishing rights associated with over one hundred copyright registrations covering over two hundred musical recordings. They bring claims against defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Digital Service, Inc. (together “Amazon” or “defendant”), alleging that Amazon infringed their copyrights by distributing phonorecords of p
the Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, Texas v. Zachry Construction Corporationpublic domain
ACCEPTED 14-10-00708-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 5:04:25 PM
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Muncey v. Eyeglass World, LLCpublic domain
OPINION SUTIN, Judge. {1} A jury awarded Dr. Willis Muncey compensatory and punitive damages against Eyeglass World, LLC, totaling $2,300,002 for breach of contract and for a tort claim based upon conversion of his patient files. Eyeglass World primarily attacks the verdict on grounds of lack of substantial evidence and excessive punitive damages. Eyeglass World also as
ACCEPTED 08-24-00024-CV 08-24-00024-CV EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS EL PASO, TEXAS 10/30/2024 3:34 PM
ACCEPTED 15-25-00016-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/11/2025 3:36 PM No. 15-25-00016-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
ACCEPTED 15-25-00016-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/11/2025 3:55 PM No. 15-25-00016-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
ACCEPTED 14-15-00991-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Dearborn Maple Venture, LLC v. SCI Illinois Services, Inc., 2012 IL App (1st) 103513 Appellate Court DEARBORN MAPLE VENTURE, LLC, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant- Caption Appellant, v. SCI ILLINOIS SERVICES, INC., Defendant and Counterplaintiff and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee (JDL Development
OPINION RENDELL, Circuit Judge: The issue before us is straightforward: does Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC (“Columbia”), have the right of eminent *303domain to obtain easements over the land of objecting landowners, outside of the existing right of way, in order to replace deteriorating pipeline? The answer is equally straightforward and clear: y
ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS