Cases

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D2024-0989 LT Case No. 2023-CF-015342-A _____________________________ STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. THOMAS MICHAEL PASTOR, JR., Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County. Aaron Peacock, Acting Circuit Judge.

11 Essex St. Corp. v Tower Ins. Co. of N.Y.??? Tower Ins. Co. of N.Y., 11 Essex St. Corp. v??? 2017 NYS

*281 Opinion COOK, Judge: A general court-martial with members convicted the accused of indecent sexual acts with his stepdaughter, Jackie. We conclude that the trial judge erroneously denied a defense motion for a mistrial, and we set aside the conviction. Declaration of a mistrial “is a drastic remedy” and should be gra

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan June 25, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

BENTON, Circuit Judge. Michael Daniel Croyle, by his parent and legal guardian Sandra G. Croyle, sued under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 - 80, for negligent supervision and failure to warn of Mark N. Matson's sexual propensities. The

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan January 25, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

05/25/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 27, 2018 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. FRANK EDWARD SMALL Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sullivan County No. S60656 R. Jerry Beck, Judge No. E2017-01266-CCA-R3-CD The Defend

NEWSOM, Circuit Judge: *1205 Police officers interrupt what they reasonably believe to be a residential burglary and detain two suspects just outside the house. Having done so, can the officers thereafter lawfully enter the home-without a warrant, and without further suspicion of wrongdoi

ORDER CECILIA M. ALTONAGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendant, Anthony Martin’s Motion to Stay Proceedings and Administratively Close Case Pending Resolution of Related State Criminal and Administrative Investigations [ECF No. 14], filed February 28, 2017, within two weeks of service of the Complaint [ECF No. 1] (see Return of Service [ECF No. 12-1]). The

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc STATE OF MISSOURI, ) Opinion issued July 16, 2019 ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) No. SC96924 ) CRAIG M. WOOD,

GORTON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Benjamin Pershouse ("Pershouse" or "plaintiff") brings this putative class action against L.L. Bean, Inc. ("L.L. Bean" or "defendant"). Pershouse alleges that L.L. Bean rescinded its well-known "100% Satisfaction Guarantee" ("Satisfaction Guarantee" or "the Guarantee") by inserting new conditions for its return policy and then applying them retroactively to purchases made under the orig

No. 04-97-00911-CR Edward Rene GOMEZ, Appellant v. The State of TEXAS, Appellee From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 96-CR-4832 Honorable Sharon MacRae, Judge Presiding

ACCEPTED 03-15-00280-CV 6142048 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 01-15-00919-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 10/29/2015 8:39:34 AM

Tanya S. Chutkan, District Judge The Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") has moved for a preliminary injunction to block a proposed merger between defendants Wilhelmsen Maritime Services AS ("WMS"), Wilhelmsen Ship Services ("WSS") (collectively "Wilhelmsen"), and The Resolute Fund II, L.P., Drew Marine Intermediate II B.V., and Drew Marine Group, Inc. (collectively "Drew"), two large providers of marine water treatment chemicals and r

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART AND DEFERRING JUDGMENT ON MOTION DAVID BRAMLETTE, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on Defendant’s, Laura Smith, Motion for Summary Judgment [docket entry no. 134], Defendant’s, James Allred, Motion for Summary Judgment [docket entry no. 137], Defendants’, Adams County, Mississippi, Charles Harrigill, and Charles R. M

499 F.3d 47 (2007) In re SONUS NETWORKS, INC, Shareholder Derivative Litigation. Michael Pisnoy; Michelle Burke, Derivatively on behalf of Sonus Networks, Inc., a Delaware Corporation; Daniel Williams, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Hassan M. Ahmed; Stephen J. Nill; Edward T. Anderson; Paul J. Ferri; Paul J. Severino; Sonus Networks, Inc.; Albert A. Notini; J. Michael O'Hara; Edward N. Harris; Paul R. Jones; Rubin Gruber, Defendants-Appellees.

ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE THE EXPERT REPORT, OPINIONS, AND TESTIMONY OF DR. QUESTEN AND DR. TEGZES; AND (3) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD AND MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME Edward M. Chen, United States District Judge Plaintiffs have filed a class action against Defendant Nestle Purin

534 F.3d 65 (2008) Keri EVANS, on behalf of herself and a class of all others similarly situated; Timothy Whipps, on behalf of himself and a class of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Appellants, Lawrence Bunch, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and on behalf of the W.R. Grace & Co. Employee Savings and Investment Plan and the Grace Stock Fund; Jerry L. Howard, Sr.; David Mueller, individually and on behalf of a

303 F.Supp.2d 197 (2004) CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS CO., Plaintiff, v. TRUSTMARK INSURANCE, et al., Defendants. No. 3:01CV948 (MRK). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. February 18, 2004. *199 Jeannine W. Chanes, John W. Fried, Fried & Epstein, New York, NY, Joseph M. Pastore, III, Brown Raysman Millstein Felder &