Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Michael Debus”
Debus v. Crumbpublic domain
BLACK, J., This personal injury case arises from a series of collisions involving four motor vehicles traveling east on Route 80 near Stroudsburg, Monroe County, Pennsylvania, on November 18,1991. Before the court is the motion of additional defendant, Walter A. Reed Jr., for the entry of a judgment of non pros or in the alternative for summary judgment *376on the
People of Michigan v. Shantel Elaine Debuspublic domain
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan October 23, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 146952
State v. Penneypublic domain
OPINION OROZCO, Judge. ¶ 1 The State appeals the trial court’s order dismissing with prejudice two counts of aggravated driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs (DUI), both class four felonies, against Defendant, Michael Kevin Penney. The court found that after Penney told police he wanted to talk to a lawyer, police put him in a room with a telephone and a phonebook, but rejected his subs
Prater v. Comprehensive Health Center, LLCpublic domain
EMAS, J. Plaintiff, Linda Prater, appeals the trial court’s order striking her pleadings and entering final judgment in favor of the Defendants, Comprehensive Health Center, LLC, Rose-May Seide, M.D. and Phil-lipe Louis Jacques, P.A. For the reasons set forth herein, we reverse. At the heart of this appeal is the 'late disclosure of a single piece of evi
Townes v. National Deaf Academy, LLCpublic domain
EDWARDS, J. ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING, CLARIFICATION, AND ■ CERTIFICATION We grant Appellee’s motions for clarification and for rehearing in part, and deny them in part. We deny Appellee’s motions for rehearing en banc and for certification. We substitute the following opinion in place of our .original opinion. . Denise Townes
PER CURIAM. Petitioners seeks a writ of prohibition to review the denial of their motion to disqualify the trial judge. As the underlying motion to disqualify was timely and legally sufficient, we grant the petition and remand with directions to reassign the case to a successor judge. Pending below is a professional negligence case against petitioners. Pe
State v. Bhattpublic domain
260 P.3d 1088 (2011) STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Kailash P. BHATT, Appellant. No. 1 CA-CR 10-0288. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. July 26, 2011. *1089 Thomas C. Horne, Arizona Attorney General By Kent E. Cattani, Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals/Capital Litigation Section And Michael T. O'Toole, Assistan
Children's Medical Center, P.A. v. Kim ex rel. Kimpublic domain
PER CURIAM. The petitioners are pediatric physicians who seek certiorari review of an order denying their ■ motion to abate a medical negligence action. They assert that, before the action can proceed in circuit court, an administrative law judge must first determine whether the injuries suffered by ■ the respondents’ child fall within the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (NICA). See §§ 766.301-766
United States v. Laceypublic domain
Honorable Susan M. Brnovich, United States District Judge There are seven defendants in this matter. Of which, six have joined the motion before the Court. Defendants Joye Vaught and Andrew Padilla filed a motion to dismiss the indictment against them or, in the alternative, a motion to allow their counsel to withdraw. (Doc. 456). Defendants James Larkin (Doc. 463), Scott Spear (Doc. 464), Michael Lacey (Doc. 465), and John Brunst (
MacGowan v. Ritterpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * The judgment of the district court dismissing the appellant’s claims against the appellees is in all respects AFFIRMED, for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s reports and recommendations, as adopted by the district court. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6. The appellant’s motion for injunctive relief pending appeal is DENIED as moot. Pur
State v. Galanpublic domain
134 Ariz. 590 (1982) 658 P.2d 243 STATE of Arizona, Appellant, v. Michael Arthur GALAN, Appellee. No. 1 CA-CR 5825. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A. November 18, 1982. Rehearing Denied December 27, 1982. Review Denied January 25, 1983. Robert K. Corbin, Atty. Gen. by William J. Schafer,
Collins v. Superior Courtpublic domain
158 Ariz. 145 (1988) 761 P.2d 1049 Richard Kenneth COLLINS, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF the State of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF MARICOPA, Honorable Michael J. O'Melia, a judge thereof, Respondent Judge. STATE of Arizona ex rel. Thomas E. COLLINS, Maricopa County Attorney, Real Party in Interest. No. CV-88-0167-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc. <
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT CHILDREN’S MEDICAL CENTER, P.A., THEODORE MORRISON, M.D., KENNETH BUDOWSKY, M.D., JACINTA MAGNUS, M.D., and NANCY CHIANG, M.D., Petitioners, v. JAKYUNG KIM and WOOCHAN KIM, as parents and next friend of BABY SEAHYUN KIM, a minor, Respondents.
Haag v. Steinlepublic domain
255 P.3d 1016 (2011) Albert C. HAAG, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Roland J. STEINLE, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa, Respondent Judge, State of Arizona ex rel. William G. Montgomery, Maricopa County Attorney, Real Party in Interest. No. 1 CA-SA 11-0084. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C. May 5, 2011
Barrett v. Samaritan Health Services, Inc.public domain
153 Ariz. 138 (1987) 735 P.2d 460 John BARRETT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICES, INC., an Arizona corporation; and Maryvale Emergency Physicians, Ltd., an Arizona corporation, Defendants-Appellants. No. 1 CA-CIV 8895. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. March 26, 1987. *140
G4s Secure Solutions USA, Inc., Etc. v. Golzarpublic domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 9, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D14-2588 Lower Tribunal No. 10-60245 ________________ G4S Secure Solutions USA, Inc., etc.,
Franz v. Statepublic domain
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE KATHERINE ANN FRANZ, Petitioner, ARTHUR EVAN SCHLEMMER, Petitioner, v. STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent1 No. 1 CA-SA 25-0121 1 CA-SA 25-0123 (Consolidated) FILED 08-05-2025 Special Action from the Sup
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Superior Courtpublic domain
161 Ariz. 181 (1988) 777 P.2d 679 STATE of Arizona, ex rel. Robert K. CORBIN, Attorney General, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF MARICOPA, the Honorable Gloria G. Ybarra, Judge, Division Criminal Four, Respondent, and EXCEL INDUSTRIES, INC., Harvey Allen Goldvarg, Clyde Arthur Fritz, Wilfred J. Fienhage, Jr., and Ernest Miller, Real Parties in Interest, Respondents.
State v. Collinspublic domain
21 Ariz. App. 575 (1974) 522 P.2d 40 STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Mary Evelyn COLLINS, Appellant. No. 2 CA-CR 358. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2. May 15, 1974. Rehearing Denied June 6, 1974. Gary K. Nelson, Atty. Gen., by Michael C. Anderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for appellee. Debus, Busby & Green
Gehres v. City of Phoenixpublic domain
156 Ariz. 484 (1987) 753 P.2d 174 Paul GEHRES, surviving spouse of Violet Gehres, deceased, and Helen Melius, surviving daughter of Violet Gehres, Deceased, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. The CITY OF PHOENIX, a municipal corporation, Defendant/Appellant. Paul GEHRES, surviving spouse of Violet Gehres, deceased, and Helen Melius, surviving daughter of Violet Gehres, deceased, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. The CITY OF PHOENIX,