Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Michael David Hill”
David Michael Norgaardpublic domain
KITE, Justice. [¶ 1] David Michael Norgaard claims he was subjected to cruel and/or unusual punishment in violation of the United States and Wyoming constitutions when he was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole upon his second conviction for sexual abuse of a minor. We acknowledge the punishment is harsh, but, under the ciream-stances presented here, we
Hill, David Michael v. Statepublic domain
Affirmed and Opinion filed April 15, 2004 Affirmed and Opinion filed April 15, 2004. In The
David v. Hillpublic domain
401 F.Supp.2d 749 (2005) Michael DAVID, TDCJ-CID # 648558, v. Howard HILL, et al. No. C.A. C-04-673. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division. November 16, 2005. *750 *751 *752 Michael David, Tennessee Colony, TX, pro se. Eli
Debbra Hill v. Michael Astruepublic domain
OPINION PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: On December 7, 2006, Debbra Jo Hill (“Hill”) filed for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Hill alleged disability beginning April 4, 2004. Hill claims that she is disabled due to unstable diabetes, eyesight problems, bipolar disorder,
Debbra Hill v. Michael Astruepublic domain
ORDER The opinion filed August 7, 2012 is withdrawn. A superseding opinion is being filed concurrently with this order. In the opinion, Part I of the Discussion, paragraph six, penultimate sentence, starting with “Dr. Johnson’s statement” and ending with “Hill faces” shall be amended in full to read as follows: Dr. Johnson’s statement that Hill would b
Anthony A. Browne v. Edward Alton Hill, Adam Paul Pyatt, Michael Paul Noel, and David William Ambriscopublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 18-1488 Filed August 21, 2019 ANTHONY A. BROWNE, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. EDWARD ALTON HILL, ADAM PAUL PYATT, MICHAEL PAUL NOEL, and DAVID WILLIAM AMBRISCO, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Paul D. Miller, Judge. A former university employe
United States v. Hillpublic domain
ORDER Appellant has filed a petition for panel rehearing. The petition for panel rehearing is granted; the memorandum disposition, filed on December 12, 2005, is withdrawn; and a revised memorandum disposition is filed in its place. MEMORANDUM ** David Michael Hill appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to possession of child pornography in violation
United States v. Hillpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** David Michael Hill appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to possession of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(5)(B). Hill contends that this case should be remanded pursuant to United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) because he was sentenced under the mandatory guidelines. The district court, however, recognized at
Hill v. Wilkinsonpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David E. Hill appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), action without prejudice, and the court’s subsequent order denying Hill’s Fed.R
State v. Hill, Wd-07-022 (11-7-2008)public domain
DECISION AND JUDGMENT {¶ 1} Appellant, Michael David Hill, appeals from his conviction in the Wood County Court of Common Pleas for escape, a violation of R.C. 2921.34 and a felony of the third degree. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. {¶ 2} Appellant initially set forth the following assignments of error:
Hill v. Hillierpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thomas W. Hill appeals the district court’s orders: (1) dismissing as interlocutory his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order enforcing certain terms of a settlement agreement; (2) denying his motion for recusal; and (3) denying his motion for reconsideration. We h
Hill v. Hillierpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thomas W. Hill appeals the district court’s orders: (1) dismissing as interlocutory his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order enforcing certain terms of a settlement agreement; (2) denying his motion for recusal; and (3) denying his motion for reconsideration. We h
United States v. Hillpublic domain
Remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David Hill seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 33 motion (No. 09-6049) and subsequent motion for reconsideration (No. 09-6413). In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgmen
United States v. Hillpublic domain
Remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David Hill seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 33 motion (No. 09-6049) and subsequent motion for reconsideration (No. 09-6413). In criminal cases, the defendant must file the notice of appeal within ten days after the entry of judgmen
David Charles Croypublic domain
HILL, Justice. [¶1] David Croy pled no contest to one count of interference with a police officer. Under the plea agreement, the State was to recommend a sentence of not less than three years nor more than five years of incarceration. In return, the State would request the court to suspend Croy's sentence and place him on probation for five years. However, the district court did
Michael A. Miller v. State of Indianapublic domain
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Kimberly A. Jackson Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Indianapolis, Indiana Attorney General of Indiana Laura R. Anderson Deputy Attorney General Indianapoli
OPINION BY JUDGE SIMPSON This case involves an issue of first impression, whether a Catholic college’s expulsion decision is reviewable by the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (Commission). A former African-American student, Allan-Michael Meads (Student) filed a complaint with the Commission, alleging Chestnut Hill College (College) expelled him base
Michael Allan Lindstrompublic domain
KITE, Justice. [¶1] A jury found Michael Allan Lind-strom guilty of three counts of first degree sexual abuse of a minor and three counts of second degree sexual abuse of a minor for acts involving two victims. The jury also found him guilty of two counts of aggravated assault and two counts of first degree sexual assault for acts involving an adult victim. He appeals claiming th
Stornawaye Financial Corp. v. Hill (Hill)public domain
387 B.R. 339 (2008) David HILL, Debtor. Stornawaye Financial Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Hill, Defendant-Appellant. BAP Nos. MB 07-041, MW 07-042. Bankruptcy No. 05-12703-WCH. Adversary No. 05-01622. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit. May 7, 2008. *341 Isaac H. Peres, Boston, MA, on b
MATHESON, Circuit Judge. In 2012, O.K. Farms, Inc. hired J.B. Hunt Transportation, Inc. (“Hunt”) to deliver chickens to Roger Gentry, a poultry grower with a farm near Wister, Oklahoma. Hunt, in turn, hired truck driver Troy Ford to deliver the chickens. On August 12, 2012, friends and relatives of Mr. Gentry were present to help him receive the delivery, among them, Jimmy Hill