⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Michael D. Vick”

Vick v. Wongpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009-08-05 · Published · cited 31× · 263 F.R.D. 325; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95597; 2009 WL 3319357
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Michael D. Vick’s (“Plaintiff’) motion for entry of default judgment, and defendant Mary Roy Wong’s (“Wong”) motion to set aside entry of default. After examining the motions, associated briefs, and the Complaint, the Court finds that oral argument is unnecessary because the facts and legal con
Vicks v. Californiapublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2013-10-07 · Published · cited 0× · 134 S. Ct. 283; 187 L. Ed. 2d 205; 82 U.S.L.W. 3187; 571 U.S. 913; 2013 WL 3778411; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 6424
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.
In re Vickspublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2013-03-04 · Published · cited 85× · 56 Cal. 4th 274; 295 P.3d 863; 153 Cal. Rptr. 3d 471; 2013 WL 781496; 2013 Cal. LEXIS 1501
Opinion CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J. In 2008, California voters approved Proposition 9, the Victims’ Bill of Rights Act of 2008: Marsy’s Law. The changes enacted by Marsy’s Law became effective immediately; pertinent here are the amendments to Penal Code1 section 3041.5 that increase the period of time between parole hearings but allow for the advancement of a hearing if a change in circ
Vick v. Morrispublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996-12-31 · Published · cited 0× · 106 F.3d 388; 1996 WL 754813; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 34734
106 F.3d 388 Shiron R. Vickv.Emery W. Morris, Warden F.C.I. Fairton, Michael B. Cooksey,Warden F.C.I. Fairton, Mark B. Connors, Associate Warden, T.Cary Vogt, Unit Manager Housing Unit D, Paul Rothbaum, UnitManager Housing Unit D, Rebecca Bowen, Case Manager HousingUnit D-Right NO. 96-5436 United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit. Dec 31, 1996
Vick v. Bellpublic domain
District Court, D. South Carolina · 1989-06-26 · Published · cited 0× · 715 F. Supp. 143; 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7761; 1989 WL 75953
ORDER BLATT, Chief Judge. This matter is before the court on the plaintiff’s motion to amend or vacate judgment. This court, by order filed July 22, 1988, dismissed this action without prejudice as to defendant Michael G. Bell, and remanded the case against defendants Jeff A. Johnson and Barry Johnson to state court. The parties have consented to the remand of the case as to defendants Jeff A. Johnson and Ba
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992-10-13 · Published · cited 49× · 840 P.2d 619; 1992 OK 140; 63 O.B.A.J. 2931; 1992 Okla. LEXIS 198; 1992 WL 278921
840 P.2d 619 (1992) The SAMUEL ROBERTS NOBLE FOUNDATION, INC., Appellant, v. Alonzo VICK d/b/a Southern Oklahoma Testing and Engineering, Appellee. No. 73757. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. October 13, 1992. *621 George D. Davis, Connie M. Bryan, McKinney, Stringer & Webster, P.C., Oklahoma City, Michael A. Cawley, Thompson &
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2013-11-06 · Published · cited 2× · 423 S.W.3d 442; 2013 WL 5925849; 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 13646
OPINION Opinion by: SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice. In 2008, Luis Aguilar died when a vehicle fell from a car jack and landed on him. Aguilar’s estate and survivors sued Ford Motor Company and Florentino Garza, a used car dealer doing business as Tino’s Auto Mart. 1 The trial court rendered a dire
Vick v. Astruepublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-05-02 · Published · cited 0× · 231 F. App'x 590
MEMORANDUM ** It is legal error when an ALJ fails to grant deference to the conclusions of a treating physician where this court has advised the Commissioner that he must do so. Ghokassian v. Shalala, 41 F.3d 1300, 1303 (9th Cir.1994). The ALJ’s conclusory assertions—for example that there was “no evidence of consistently severe limitations that would preclude the performance of a wide range of li
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009-07-30 · Published · cited 118× · 454 Mass. 418; 910 N.E.2d 339; 2009 Mass. LEXIS 422
Spina, J. A Superior Court jury convicted the defendant, Jonathan Vick, of armed assault with intent to murder, assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon causing serious bodily injury, unlawful possession of a firearm, and unlawful possession of ammunition for the shooting of Hakeem Shepherd in Everett on July 27, 2006.1 The defendant appealed from his convictions, and we granted his applicat
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015-11-23 · Published · cited 0× · 335 Ga. App. 155; 779 S.E.2d 136
Boggs, Judge. This appeal involves the interpretation of OCGA § 14-11-601.1 (b) (4) (D), a portion of the Code section governing the cessation of membership in a limited liability company. The trial court granted partial summary judgment in favor of appellees, holding that appellant Sharon Crumpton ceased to be a member of two limited liability companies by filing a petition seeki
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981-10-06 · Published · cited 1× · 283 S.E.2d 101; 304 N.C. 191; 1981 N.C. LEXIS 1332
283 S.E.2d 101 (1981) WESTERN AUTO SUPPLY COMPANY v. James Oliver VICK, Trading and doing business as a Western Auto Associate Store. No. 77. Supreme Court of North Carolina. October 6, 1981. Smith, Anderson, Blount, Dorsett, Mitchell & Jernigan by Michael E. Weddington and Carl N. Patterson, Jr., Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant. Biggs, Meadows, Etheridg
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981-05-05 · Published · cited 7× · 277 S.E.2d 360; 303 N.C. 30; 1981 N.C. LEXIS 1083
Justice CARLTON dissenting. I join in the dissenting opinion filed by Justice Meyer and dissent for other reasons as well. I must also register my disagreement with section III of the majority opinion dealing with the element of usurious intent. My first objection to that section is that it is wholly unnecessary and thus dictum. The only issues presented for our review are whether the usury laws
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989-05-23 · Published · cited 9× · 875 F.2d 258; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 7153; 1989 WL 53331
SNEED, Circuit Judge: Michael Dean Vicks, a state prisoner, appeals in propria persona from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Vicks argues that the California courts based his conviction on insufficient proof, admitted prejudicial evidence at his trial, improperly enhanced his sentence, and incorrectly instructed the jury. We reverse and remand.
Vick v. DaCORSIpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2003-07-07 · Published · cited 28× · 1 Cal. Rptr. 3d 626; 110 Cal. App. 4th 206; 2003 Daily Journal DAR 7469; 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5968; 2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1021
1 Cal.Rptr.3d 626 (2003) 110 Cal.App.4th 206 William E. VICK et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Edward DaCORSI et al., Defendants, Respondents. No. B155884. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Seven. July 7, 2003. *627 Knapp, Petersen & Clarke, Kevin J. Stack, Glendale; Holmes & Wells and
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024-04-09 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ENVIROKARE COMPOSITE ) CORPORATION, derivatively on ) behalf of Nominal Defendant LRM ) INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL, ) INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2022-1202-KSJM
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014-11-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 21, 2014 Session BARBARA M. HICKS VICK v. BRANDON P. HICKS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT00346711 Robert Samual Weiss, Judge No. W2013-02672-COA-R3-CV - Filed November 17, 2014 This appeal arises from the trial court’s dismissal of Appellant Brandon Hicks’ (“Husban
Vick v. Williamspublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000-11-20 · Published · cited 18× · 233 F.3d 213; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 29523
233 F.3d 213 (4th Cir. 2000) DANNY SYLVESTER VICK, Petitioner-Appellant,v.JOHN R. WILLIAMS, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Tillery Correctional Institution, North Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee. No. 99-7406. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. Argued: September 26, 2000.Decided: November 20, 2000.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2007-02-27 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 27, 2007 Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 27, 2007. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Vick v. Williamspublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000-11-20 · Published · cited 2× · 233 F.3d 213; 2000 WL 1724031
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge LUTTIG wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINS and Senior Judge HAMILTON joined. OPINION LUTTIG, Circuit Judge: Petitioner-appellant Danny Sylvester Vick, a North Carolina inmate, appeals from the district court’s denial of his application under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus.
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2024-09-19 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion filed September 19, 2024 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-22-00155-CR __________ MICHAEL MCMILLIAN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 42nd District Court Taylor C