Cases

OPINION BY STRASSBURGER, J.: Before us are identical issues raised in two appeals from orders granting summary judgment to Defendants 1 in nuisance actions filed by Plaintiffs. 2 We affirm. The relevant facts are as follows. The Dagostin family

OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. In these consolidated antitrust conspiracy cases, two groups of plaintiffs, one a certified class of direct purchasers of chocolate products (“the Direct Purchaser Class”), and the other a group of individual plaintiffs (“the Individual Plaintiffs”) (collectively, “the Plaintiffs”), appeal the District Court’s

629 F.3d 1331 (2010) SPANSION, INC. and Spansion, LLC, Appellants, and Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Appellant, and ATI Technologies, ULC, Appellant, and STMicroelectronics N.V., Appellant, and Qualcomm Incorporated, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and Tessera, Inc., Intervenor. Nos. 2009-1460, 2009-1461, 2009-1462, 2009-1465. United States Court of Appeals,

827 F.Supp.2d 1199 (2011) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. GRANT CONNECT, LLC, et al., Defendants. No. 2:09-CV-01349-PMP-RJJ. United States District Court, D. Nevada. October 25, 2011. *1204 Blaine T. Welsh, U.S. Attorney's Office, Las Vegas, NV, Dotan Weinman, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Roberto Anguizola, Tracey Thom

Affirmed in part and question certified to the Court of Appeals of Maryland by published order. Judge FLOYD directed entry of the order with the concurrence of Judge KING and Judge WYNN. ORDER FLOYD, Circuit Judge: This case arises out of one of the largest residential arsons in Maryland history. See Michael E

639 F.Supp.2d 877 (2009) STANDARD IRON WORKS, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ARCELORMITTAL; ArcelorMittal USA, Inc.; United States Steel Corporation; Nucor Corporation; Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation; Steel Dynamics, Inc.; AK Steel Holding Corporation; Ssab Swedish Steel Corporation; Commercial Metals, Inc., Defendants. No. 08 C 5214. United States District Court,

314 Ga. 488 FINAL COPY S22G0019. HALL et al. v. DAVIS LAWN CARE SERVICE, INC. et al. PINSON, Justice. A conservator of a minor is a person appointed by a court to take care of the minor’s property. On appointment, the conservator gains the “exclusive power” to “[b]ring, defend, or participate in legal . . . proceedings” on the minor’s behalf. OCGA § 29-3-22 (a) (6). In this case, a conservator was appointed after the minor children’s grandmot

DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff Timothy Barkovic was a Michigan attorney from 1979 until he surrendered his law license on December 1, 2015. Barkovic apparently had several brushes over the years with Michigan's attorney discipline system. He contends that his resignation (which

MICHEL, Chief Judge. This is a trade case concerning the interplay between the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act, Pub.L. No. 103-182, 107 Stat. 2057 (1993) (codified at 19 U.S.C. §§ 3301-3473) (“NAFTA Implementation Act” or “NIA”), and the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act, Pub.L. No. 106-387, § 1003, 114 Stat. 1549, 1623 (2000) (“CDSOA”), repealed by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005,

725 F.Supp.2d 1370 (2010) William R. GROSSCUP, Petitioner/Plaintiff, v. Colonel Alfred A. PANTANO, Jr., District Commander for the Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Florida Department of Community Affairs, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, City of Key West, and United States of America, Respondents/Defendants. Case No. 10-10015-CIV. Uni

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: The Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 (ADA) expressly preempts state efforts to regulate the prices, routes, and services of certain air carriers. Beginning in 2011, West Virginia enacted various laws to limit the reimbursement rates of air ambulance companies. Air Evac, an air ambulance company and registered air carrier, sued to enjoin the enforcement of the

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 181–411 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 29, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

486 F.Supp.2d 1078 (2007) In re RUBBER CHEMICALS ANTITRUST LITIGATION. No. C04-1648 MJJ (BZ). United States District Court, N.D. California. May 9, 2007. *1079 Joseph M. Barton, Paul F. Bennett, C. Andrew Dirksen, Steven 0. Sidener, Gold Bennett Cera & Sidener LLP, Richard Alexander Saveri, Guido Saveri, Lisa Saveri, Saveri & Sav

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-6851 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RAYMOND ROGER SURRATT, JR., Defendant - Appellant. ------------------------------ STEVEN HARRIS GOLDBLATT, Court-Assigned Amicus C

77 F.Supp.2d 1134 (1999) Marie-Therese LEICHT, Plaintiff, v. HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC., Defendant. No. CIV. 98-00755 SOM. United States District Court, D. Hawaii. September 21, 1999. *1135 *1136 *1137 Lunsford D. Phillips, Honolulu, HI, for plaintiff.

Opinion by Judge DAVIDSON. In this action for a declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, and damages, plaintiffs, City of Aurora, City of Thornton, City of Westminster, City of Brighton, City of Broom-field, and City of Federal Heights, appeal from the denial of a preliminary injunction prohibiting defendants, the Adams County Board of Commissioners, and, in their official capacities, Helen Hill, Adams Count

09/15/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 21, 2022 Session IN RE JOSIE G. Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Hamilton County No. 295990 Robert D. Philyaw, Judge

OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In this case, the Plaintiff registered nurses (“RNs”), Pat Cason-Merenda and Jeffrey A. Suhre, seek to recover on behalf of themselves and a class of RNs against eight Detroit-area hospitals, alleging that the Defendant health care providers have violated §

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CITY OF OAKLAND, a Municipal No. 18-16663 Corporation, and The People of the State of California, acting by D.C. Nos. and through the Oakland City 3:17-cv-06011-WHA Attorney; CITY AND COUNTY OF 3:17-cv-06012-WHA SAN FRANCISCO, a Municipal Corporation, and The People of the State of California, acting by ORDER AND and through the San Francisco AMENDED C

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CITY OF OAKLAND, a Municipal No. 18-16663 Corporation, and The People of the State of California, acting by D.C. Nos. and through the Oakland City 3:17-cv-06011-WHA Attorney; CITY AND COUNTY OF 3:17-cv-06012-WHA SAN FRANCISCO, a Municipal Corporation, and The People of the State of California, acting by OPINION and through the San Francisco City Attorney Denni