Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
12 opinions for “Michael D Terracciano”
Metz v. Peconic Bay Med. Ctr.public domain
Metz v Peconic Bay Med. Ctr. (2022 NY Slip Op 01996) Metz v Peconic Bay Med. Ctr. 2022 NY Slip Op 01996 Decided on March 23, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pu
Velasquez v. Ruizpublic domain
Velasquez v Ruiz (2022 NY Slip Op 01343) Velasquez v Ruiz 2022 NY Slip Op 01343 Decided on March 2, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §
Cusimano v. Schnurrpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Richter, J. In this appeal, we must determine, first, whether the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) (9 USC § 1 et seq.) applies to the underlying agreements and, second, whether plaintiffs waived their right to arbitrate a statute of limitations issue by having pursued their claims through litigation. We conclude that
In re Naglerpublic domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER MARGO K. BRODIE, United States District Judge Petitioners Jeffrey Nagler, as owner of the fishing vessel Midnight Star, and Bullet Services LLC, as owner of the fishing vessel Lady Midnight, brought the above-*652captioned Petition1 on March 19, 2015, for exoneration or limitation of liability pur
In re Bridge Construction Services of Florida, Inc.public domain
*378 OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: These actions in admiralty arose out of injuries that claimant Jose Ayala sustained after falling off a barge named “Hughes 660” on the Hudson River. Ayala contends that he fell off the barge because the barge was jolted by a tugboat. The petitioners, Bridge Construction Services of Florid
Perini Corp. v. City of New Yorkpublic domain
18 F.Supp.2d 287 (1998) PERINI CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant. No. 97 Civ. 4808(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 11, 1998. *288 K. Richard Marcus, Randy J. Heller, McDonough Marcus Cohn Tretter Heller & Kanca, L.L.P., New York City, for Plaintiff. Michael D. Hess, Jo
People v. Maderapublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Phylis Skloot Bamberger, J. Defendant is charged with criminal possession of weapon. In an omnibus pretrial motion, the defendant sought suppression of the gun that is the subject of the charges. A hearing was held on November 13, 1991, and Police Officer Michael Clohessy testified. On December 9, 1991, pursuant to a request by this court, counsel submitted memoranda discussing the ef
In Re Valley Line Co.public domain
564 F.Supp. 612 (1983) In re The VALLEY LINE COMPANY, Owner of the M/V A.D. Haynes, in an action for exoneration from and/or limitation of liability, Plaintiff. No. 82-0432A(3). United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D. May 12, 1983. *613 Raymond L. Massey, Thompson & Mitchell, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff. Jerome J.
In re the Complaint of Moran Towing Corp.public domain
AMENDED OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Two actions were tried to the court from May 20, 2013 through June 4, 2013, the petition for exoneration filed by the petitioner Moran Towing Corporation (“Moran” or the “Petitioner”) and a Jones Act and general maritime law action for negligence filed by claimant Avril Young (“Avril Young” or the “Claimant”). These actions
State v. Hanemannpublic domain
180 N.J. Super. 544 (1981) 435 A.2d 1179 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JOHN H. HANEMANN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division. Argued September 14, 1981. Decided September 23, 1981. *546 Before Judges ALLCORN, GEORGE B. FRANCIS and MORTON I. GREENBERG. <
In Re the Complaint of Tecomar S.A.public domain
765 F.Supp. 1150 (1991) In the Matter of the Complaint of TECOMAR S.A., as Owner of the M/V TUXPAN for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability. No. 87 Civ. 2611 (CHT). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 31, 1991. *1151 *1152 *1153 Haight, Gardner,
United States v. Nicodemo Scarfopublic domain
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ Nos. 15-2811, 15-2826, 15-2844, 15-2925, 19-1398 _____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NICODEMO S. SCARFO, SALVATORE PELULLO, WILLIAM MAXWELL, and JOHN MAXWELL, Appellants _______________ On Appeal from the United States District Co