Cases

907 S.W.2d 392 (1995) STATE of Tennessee, Appellant, v. Jerrell C. LIVINGSTON. STATE of Tennessee, Appellee, v. Steve BUNDY, Appellant. STATE of Tennessee, Appellee, v. Johnny R. TILLEY, Appellant. STATE of Tennessee, Appellee, v. David JOHNSON, Appellant. Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville. September 5, 1995. *

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-07-043 CV

[Cite as Cleveland v. Jaber, 2021-Ohio-1486.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA CITY OF CLEVELAND, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 109648 v. : MERWAN MARK JABER, :

[Cite as Gerace v. Cleveland Clinic Found., 2024-Ohio-2708.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JAMES GERACE, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 113231 v. : CLEVELAND CLINIC

J-A04043-19 2019 PA Super 134 MANAJA LIVINGSTON, DARREN : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SHIN, ROSAURA SANCHEZ, HECTOR : PENNSYLVANIA AMADO SANCHEZ, ROSA MARIA : TAPIA, SEMEN BABADZHANOV AND : TATIANA LIAKH : : : v. : : No. 318 EDA 2

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 266 In this consolidated appeal, the defendant-appellant, Cleveland Board of Zoning Appeals ("BOZA"), challenges a judgment by the trial court reversing its decision to rescind a lot split and revoke a building permit issued to plaintiff-appellee, Raceway Video and Bookshop, Inc. Western-Elmwood-Berea Corporation ("WE

Celebrezze, C.J. %Ghis case presents the issue of whether a park district is protected by immunity from tort liability. This question requires a determination of whether the defense of sovereign immunity is available to the park district, and if not, whether statutory immunity applies. We conclude that the common-law doctrine of sovereign immunity has been abrogated, but that statutory immunity applies in this case.

Holmes, J. In presenting its case to this court, CEI argues that specific jury instructions are no longer required to be given by a trial court in that Civ. R. 51(A) has abolished such instructions, and that the law applicable to the case is to be set forth by the trial court in its general charge to the jury. Appellant essentially contends that in a land appropriation action involving a partial taking, a sufficient charge is one

[Cite as Cleveland Hts. v. Preston, 2026-Ohio-344.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA CITY OF CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 114908 v. : JAZMANE PRESTON,

144 F.Supp.2d 908 (2001) Eleare KINNEY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CLEVELAND, et al., Defendants. No. 1:99CV3054. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. May 4, 2001. *909 Thomas M. Horwitz, Peltz & Birne, Cleveland, OH, for Eleare Kinney, plaintiffs. Heather D. Graham-Oliver, Awatef Assad, City Of Clevel

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-15-00103-CV TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION APPELLANT AND APPELLEE V. MICHAEL QUINN SULLIVAN APPELLEE AND APPELLANT ---------- FROM THE 158TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

OPINION GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge. Under what circumstances are volunteers protected from employment discrimination by Title VII? That is the primary, though not only, question presented in this case. Sister Michael Marie and Sister Mary Cabrini were disaster relief volunteers for the American Red Cross and the Ross County Emergency Managemen

LARRY A. JONES, SR., J.: {¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals the trial court's decision to dismiss its complaint against defendant-appellee, J.Y. For the reasons that follow, we affirm. {¶ 2} In 2017, the state filed a complaint against J.Y. alleging him to be a delinquent child in Cuyahoga J.C. No. DL-17-117673. A duplicate complaint was filed

OPINION LUTTIG, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-appellee James McKinney claims that defendant-appellant Roy Livingston violated his clearly established Fourth Amendment rights by arresting him on two occasions pursuant to warrants that were not supported by probable cause. Livingston moved for summary judgment below on grounds of qualified immunity, but that moti

SUMMARY ORDER Weiqum Lei, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, seeks review of a February 20, 2008 order of the BIA, affirming the June 19, 2006 decision of Immigration Judge (“U”) Thomas J. Mulligan, which denied Lei’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). In re Weiqum Lei, No. A200 060 133 (B.I.A. Feb. 20, 2008), aff'g N

545 F.3d 229 (2008) Majed AJLANI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael CHERTOFF, Secretary of Homeland Security, Jonathan R. Scharfen, Acting Director of USCIS, Michael B. Mukasey, Attorney General of the United States, Robert S. Mueller III, Director of Federal Bureau of Investigation, Andrea J. Quarantillo, District Director of the N.Y. USCIS Office,[1] Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-1170-cv. Uni

Fischer, J. *358 {¶ 1} Appellee, Anthony Apanovitch, was convicted of aggravated murder, aggravated burglary, and two counts of rape, and in January 1985, he was sentenced to death. The body of the victim, Mary Anne Flynn, was found in a bedroom in her home. She had b

William B. Brown, J. Originally, the object of this action was to prevent executive officers from taking continuous reductions from disbursements under the school foundation program to appellee. However, with the termination of reductions in October 1971 and with the passage of H. B. 475 on December 20, 1971, the object of the litigation changed — presenting the question whether the amounts withheld from appel

Per Curiam. The issue before this court is whether the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals applying the 1973 Cuyahoga County common level of assessment of 30.6 percent to determine the taxable value of the subject property is unreasonable or unlawful. “The Board of Tax Appeals has the mandatory duty, in the exercise of its supervisory power and duty, pursuant to R. C. 5715.01, to take s

964 F.Supp. 1073 (1997) UNITED STATES of America, v. Carl CLEVELAND, et al. Criminal Action No. 96-207. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. April 18, 1997. *1074 *1075 Anthony J. Marabella, Jr., Marabella & Moore, Stephen Bishop Street, Jr., Baton Rouge, LA, for Carl W. Cleveland