⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

10 opinions for “Michael Byrd and Beatriz Byrd”

District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023-12-01 · Published · cited 0×
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2023-2252 _____________________________ SECRETARY OF STATE BYRD, the FLORIDA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, and the FLORIDA SENATE, Appellants, v. BLACK VOTERS MATTER CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE, INC., EQUAL GROUND EDUCATION FUND, INC., LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA EDUCATION FUND,
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015-03-03 · Published · cited 7× · 123 F. Supp. 3d 990; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25251; 2015 WL 996389
Memorandum Opinion and Order GARY FEINERMAN, United States District Judge Facing massive budget shortfalls, the Chicago Board of Education decided in 2013 to close dozens of public schools. Citywide protests followed. So did the lawsuits,' including this one brought against the Board of Education and its Chief Executive Officer (together, “Board”) by, among others, Friends of Trumbull, an uni
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Polsky v. Werfelpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015-02-23 · Published · cited 0× · 87 F. Supp. 3d 748; 115 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 936; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21658; 2015 WL 756309
MEMORANDUM OPINION SAVAGE, District Judge. The central and dispositive issue in this action is whether a permanently and totally disabled child who is older than seventeen and qualifies as a dependent under section “152(c) of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) also qualifies for the child tax credit under section 24 despite the age limitation of seventeen in section 24. Considering the plain lan
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 1× · 566 S.W.3d 410
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984-01-18 · Published · cited 24× · 670 S.W.2d 651; 1984 Tex. App. LEXIS 4884
670 S.W.2d 651 (1984) SOUTHWEST CRAFT CENTER, Appellant, v. Beatriz HEILNER and Arnold M. Hyman, Appellees. No. 16889. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. January 18, 1984. Petition for Rehearing Granted in Part and Denied in Part February 22, 1984. Second Petition for Rehearing Denied March 20, 1984.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-09-26 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 NY Slip Op 04648
Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2024 NY Slip Op 04648) Matter of Attorneys Inviolation of Judiciary Law § 468-a 2024 NY Slip Op 04648 Decided on September 26, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2020-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. The current license status of a Pennsylvania attorney can be found on the Disciplinary Board’s website. https://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/for-the- public/find-attorney Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Attorneys Certified for Administrative Suspensi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006-10-12 · Published · cited 4× · 36 A.D.3d 34; 822 N.Y.S.2d 871
OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident *35and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration state
Loza v. Mitchellpublic domain
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010-03-31 · Published · cited 8× · 705 F. Supp. 2d 773; 2010 WL 1253622; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38008
705 F.Supp.2d 773 (2010) Jose Trinidad LOZA, Petitioner, v. Betty MITCHELL, Warden, Respondent. Case No. 1:98-cv-287. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 31, 2010. *782 James Allison Wilson, Jr., Monica Foster, Scott Allen Kossoudji, Vorys Sater Seymour & Pease, Columbus, OH, Laurence E. Komp, Bal