⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Michael B. Weber”

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017-08-11 · Published · cited 0× · 168 A.3d 266; 2017 Pa. Super. 259; 2017 WL 3444538; 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 606
OPINION BY STRASSBURGER, J.: Michael Weber (Son) appeals from the trial court’s August 8, 2016 order, dismissing his petition for special relief. Upon review, we vacate the trial court’s order and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion. Beth Anne F. Weber (Wife) and Mark D. Weber (Husband), were once married, and are t
Matter of Weberpublic domain
Surrogate's Court, Saratoga County · 2024-10-10 · Published · cited 1× · 2024 NY Slip Op 24258
Matter of Weber (2024 NY Slip Op 24258) [*1] Matter of Weber 2024 NY Slip Op 24258 Decided on October 10, 2024 Surrogate's Court, Saratoga County Schopf, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau
Matter of Weberpublic domain
Surrogate's Court, Saratoga County · 2024-10-10 · Published · cited 1× · 2024 NY Slip Op 24258
Matter of Weber (2024 NY Slip Op 24258) [*1] Matter of Weber 2024 NY Slip Op 24258 Decided on October 10, 2024 Surrogate's Court, Saratoga County Schopf, S. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau
In re Weberpublic domain
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2015-08-28 · Published · cited 0× · 177 So. 3d 106; 2015 La. LEXIS 1699; 2015 WL 5086459
*107ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING PER CURIAM. 11 This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Michael C. Weber, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana, but currently ineligible to practice.1 FORMAL CHARGES
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2021-12-16 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-CA-00293-SCT B. MICHAEL WEBER, M.D., AND THE OB-GYN GROUP OF LAUREL, P.A. v. ESTATE OF CAMERON CHASE HILL, DECEASED, BY AND THROUGH JANA C. BRACEWELL, ADMINISTRATRIX DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/24/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MICHAEL H. WARD TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: F. M. TURNER, III BENJAMIN BLUE MORGAN
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010-03-11 · Published · cited 0× · 444 B.R. 516; 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 805; 2010 WL 5689534
444 B.R. 516 (2010) In re Kathleen WEBER, Debtor. Chase Bank USA, N.A., Plaintiff v. Kathleen Weber, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 09-16489 SR. Adversary No. 10-001. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 11, 2010. *517 Cynthia L. Groff, Esquire, Becket & Lee LLP, Malvern, PA, for Plaintiff. Michael H
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019-04-26 · Published · cited 0×
J-A05035-19 2019 PA Super 133 BETH ANNE F. WEBER : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : MARK D. WEBER :
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019-04-26 · Published · cited 0×
J-A05035-19 2019 PA Super 133 BETH ANNE F. WEBER : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : : MARK D. WEBER : : : No. 1095 WDA 201
Utah Supreme Court · 2013-10-18 · Published · cited 10× · 2013 UT 62; 321 P.3d 1067; 745 Utah Adv. Rep. 62; 2013 Utah LEXIS 158; 2013 WL 5663831
Justice PARRISH, opinion of the Court: INTRODUCTION 1 1 We are presented with two consolidated cases. The first is a direct appeal (Appeal) from an injunction entered against Ogden Trece (Trece), a criminal street gang. The second is a petition for extraordinary writ (Petition) brought by three alleged Trece members who were served with the
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2018-05-07 · Published · cited 1× · 584 B.R. 911
Martin R. Barash, United States Bankruptcy Judge Plaintiff David Seror (the "Trustee"), trustee in the joint chapter 7 cases of *913Robert B. Daley and Lynne T. Daley (the "Debtors"), moves to strike the jury demand ("Jury Demand") of Defendant Robert B. Daley, CPA Inc. ("CPA Inc.") in the above-captioned adversary proceeding (the "Motion"). C
District Court, D. Utah · 2017-02-08 · Published · cited 3× · 233 F. Supp. 3d 1245; 2017 WL 519220; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18527
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Clark Waddoups, United States District Court Judge INTRODUCTION Weber Luke Alliance, LLC (Weber Luke) alleges trademark and copyright claims against Studio 1C. Studio 1C challenges Weber Luke’s trademark and state law claims in a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), or in the alternative motion for summary judgment.
State v. Weberpublic domain
Connecticut Superior Court · 2004-12-02 · Published · cited 1× · 49 Conn. Supp. 530; 896 A.2d 153; 2004 Conn. Super. LEXIS 3741
KELLER, J. These petitions arise out of a dismissed criminal action prosecuted by the office of the chief state’s attorney’s medicaid fraud control unit against *531Richard B. Weber, a physician. On December 22, 2003, the state’s attorney entered a nolle prosequi on a charge of larceny in the first degree pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-122 (a) (4), and the court, on W
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010-01-26 · Published · cited 42× · 309 S.W.3d 309; 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 75; 2010 WL 286744
309 S.W.3d 309 (2010) Thomas DIEHL and Barbara Diehl, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. FRED WEBER, INC., Defendant/Respondent. No. ED 92843. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. January 26, 2010. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied March 8, 2010. Application for Transfer Denied May 25, 2010.
Cordell v. Weberpublic domain
South Dakota Supreme Court · 2003-12-10 · Published · cited 15× · 2003 SD 143; 673 N.W.2d 49; 2003 S.D. LEXIS 172
673 N.W.2d 49 (2003) 2003 SD 143 Stephen CORDELL, Petitioner and Appellant, v. Douglas WEBER, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary, Respondent and Appellee. No. 22742. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs August 25, 2003. Decided December 10, 2003. *51 Michael B. Thompson
Weber v. Whitepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003-10-14 · Published · cited 2× · 2003 WI App 240; 672 N.W.2d 151; 267 Wis. 2d 862; 2003 Wisc. App. LEXIS 962
267 Wis.2d 862 (2003) 2003 WI App 240 672 N.W.2d 151 Julie L. WEBER and Joshua Weber, Plaintiffs-Respondents,[†] WEA INSURANCE CORPORATION, Carefirst of Maryland, Inc., d/b/a Carefirst Blue Cross Blue Shield, and Wisconsin Physicians Insurance Corporation, Involuntary-Plaintiffs, v. Angelene WHITE and Farmers Insurance Exchange, Defendants-Appellants. No. 03-0471
Weber v. Warnkepublic domain
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2003-01-23 · Published · cited 5× · 658 N.W.2d 90; 2003 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 23; 2003 WL 151984
658 N.W.2d 90 (2003) Jane Ann WEBER, Appellee, v. Michael Joseph WARNKE, Defendant, and Arthur Winker and Cletus Winker, d/b/a Glidden Body Shop, Appellants. No. 00-0638. Supreme Court of Iowa. January 23, 2003. Rehearing Denied March 14, 2003. *91 René Charles Lapierre of Klass, Stoik, Mugan, Villone, Philli
Hofman v. Weberpublic domain
South Dakota Supreme Court · 2002-01-23 · Published · cited 4× · 2002 SD 11; 639 N.W.2d 523; 2002 S.D. LEXIS 11
639 N.W.2d 523 (2002) 2002 SD 11 Marlo D. HOFMAN, Petitioner and Appellant, v. Douglas WEBER, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary, Respondent and Appellee. No. 21928. Supreme Court of South Dakota. Considered on Briefs November 13, 2001. Decided January 23, 2002. *525 Michael B. Thomps
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001-05-18 · Published · cited 0× · 146 F. Supp. 2d 701; 59 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1313; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11243; 2001 WL 543757
146 F.Supp.2d 701 (2001) Stephan SCHMIDHEINY v. Steven WEBER d/b/a/ Domainsale and Famology, Inc. and Famology.Com, Inc. No. C.A. 01-377. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 18, 2001. *702 Arthur Newbold, Michael S. Doluisio, Dechert, Price & Rhoads, Philadelphia, PA, Neil E. McDonnell, Lauren J. Mandell, Dor
Weber v. Whitepublic domain
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004-06-08 · Published · cited 22× · 2004 WI 63; 681 N.W.2d 137; 272 Wis. 2d 121; 2004 Wisc. LEXIS 426
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 123 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 124 The petitioners, Julie and Joshua Weber (hereinafter "the Webers"), seek *Page 125
Weber v. Weberpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992-02-04 · Published · cited 0× · 823 S.W.2d 152; 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 152; 1992 WL 15240
ORDER PER CURIAM. Wife appeals those portions of a distribution decree denying her request for rehabilitative maintenance and ordering the sale of the marital home. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not an abuse of discretion, and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth t