Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Michael B. Henley”
Hash v. Estate of Henleypublic domain
Timothy J. Hash ("plaintiff") appeals the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of the Estate of Paige Walton Henley, by and through its co-administrators, Rodney W. Henley and Jewel R. Henley ("defendants"). For the reasons stated below, we affirm. On or about 22 November 2002, plaintiff was riding as a passenger in a car driven by defendants' decedent, Paige Walton Henley ("Henley"). As they proceeded northbound on Highway 801 near Mocksville in Davie County,
Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Henleypublic domain
Per Curiam. Respondent, Gerald C. Henley of Cleveland, Ohio, does business as Henley Investment & Development Corporation and Henley Educational Consultants. Respondent is not a lawyer. In October 1999, respondent consulted with Willie L. Moore, Jr., about perceived discriminatory practices by Moore’s employer. As a result of that consultation, respondent wrote to the employer indicating that he
Henley v. FMC Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HADEN, Chief Judge. Pending are Defendant FMC Corporation’s (FMC) motion for a new trial; (2) Plaintiffs’ “Rule”1 2to strike FMC’s notice of *341newly discovered evidence; and (3) Plaintiffs’ motion to strike the two affidavits of Charles Spann. The Court GRANTS the motion for new
Henley v. FMC Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HADEN, Chief Judge. Pending are (A) Plaintiffs’ motions (1) for modification of the Scheduling Order; (2) for rehearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend or, in the alternative, for certification of the Court’s decision pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b); and (B) Defendant’s motions (1) for modification of the class definition or, in the alternative, for certifi
Henley v. Slonepublic domain
774 F.Supp. 98 (1991) Julian HENLEY, Plaintiff, v. William SLONE and Advest, Inc., Defendants. Civ. No. N-89-458 (TFGD). United States District Court, D. Connecticut, Bridgeport Division. October 2, 1991. *99 Eliot B. Gersten, Andrea A. Hewitt, Hartford, Conn., for Julian Henley. Michael J. Dodson, Greene, Turk & Lahm,
State v. Henleypublic domain
[Cite as State v. Henley, 2017-Ohio-5828.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 27326 : v.
State v. Henley.public domain
*** FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAII REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER *** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0005595 22-DEC-2015 10:02 AM IN THE S
United States v. Henleypublic domain
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Troy Henley seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certific
Henley v. Martinpublic domain
RUSSELL, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Crystal Henley appeals the Harrison County Circuit Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Dr. Frank Martin and Biloxi Regional Medical Center (BRMC). She asserts that the circuit court erred in: (1) relying on an affidavit filed three days before the scheduled hearing in granting the summary-judgment motion; (2) granting summary judgment; and (3) holding that the one-y
Henley v. Statepublic domain
OPINION Richardson , J., delivered the opinion of the Court in which-Meyers, Johnson, Keasler, Alcala, and Yeary, JJ. joined. Appellant, Gregory Shawn Henley, was found guilty by a jury of misdemeanor assault causing bodily injury to a family member/ He was sentenced to confinement for ‘200 days in the Tarrant County Jail. Appellant complained on appeal that the
State v. Henleypublic domain
SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J., ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J, and N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. ¶ 41. *629{dissenting). The per curiam correctly observes that Henley's motion for reconsideration is in essence a motion pursuing the disqualification of Justice Patience D. Roggensack. The motion asserts that the court's decision in State v. Henley1
Henley, Gregory Shawnpublic domain
PD-0257-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 7/17/2015 4:53:32 PM July 20, 2015 Accepted 7/17/2015 4:59:19 PM
United States v. Henleypublic domain
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants Dominic Henley, James C. Smith, Jerry Elkins, Marshall Fry, Anthony Robinson, and Jerry Peteet were charged with racketeering conspiracy, and various counts of violent crime in aid of racketeering in connection with their involvement with the Wheels of Soul, an outlaw motorcycle gang. Each man pled not guilty. As the case proceeded to trial, a number of the defendants filed motions to suppre
State v. Henleypublic domain
MICHAEL J. GABLEMAN, J. ¶ 1. This case comes before us on certification following the circuit court's order granting a new trial to Dimitri Henley eight years after his conviction of five counts of second degree sexual assault. The court of appeals certified five questions1 to us regarding the authority of Wisconsin courts to order a new trial in the interest of justice. ¶ 2. The f
Commonwealth v. Henleypublic domain
CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY KLEIN, J.: ¶ 1 I agree that Henley’s judgment of sentence should be affirmed, and agree that because the vehicle was stopped in a no-parking area where there were also mounds of snow, it was necessary to tow the car. Therefore, the public safety exception applies and it was appropriate to inventory the car before towing it.
Crystal Henley v. Sgt. Bill Brownpublic domain
BYE, Circuit Judge. Crystal Henley brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners and its members, Chief of Police Jim Corwin, and certain individual police officers, alleging constitutional violations under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution. The district court dismissed the action for failure to exhaust ad
Henley v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.public domain
[Cite as Henley v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2016-Ohio-5593.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Brian D. Henley, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 16AP-168 (Ct. of Cl. No. 2014-00275) v. :
Lopez v. Henleypublic domain
*456 W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge: This case presents the issue of whether a legal resident alien, who is a veteran of active service in the Vietnam War, is exempt from the requirement of demonstrating “good moral character” in order to be naturalized. Because we find the Immigration and Naturalization
Cite as 2023 Ark. 165 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-23-95 Opinion Delivered: November 16, 2023 RELIANCE HEALTH CARE, INC.; OVATION HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.; APPEAL FROM THE MISSISSIPPI RHC OPERATIONS, INC.; EAGLE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.; GNNC, INC., [NO. 47BCV-19-236] D/B/A GOSNELL THERAPY AND LIVING; SRCNC, INC., D/B/A THE HONORABLE TAN
Crystal Henley v. Sgt. Bill Brownpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 11-2561 ___________ Crystal Henley, * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * v. * * Sgt. Bill Brown, In his Individua