Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Michael Austin Payne”
Shatara Wright v. Michael Stephen Paynepublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-24-00285-CV ___________________________ SHATARA WRIGHT, Appellant V. MICHAEL STEPHEN PAYNE, Appellee On Appeal from the 481st District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 16-02115-211 Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack
Payne v. Wells Fargo Bank National Ass'npublic domain
PER CURIAM: * After Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. foreclosed on Candis Payne’s home, she sued in Tex*835as state court, alleging, among other claims, that Wells Fargo failed to provide proper notice and failed to apply insurance proceeds to cure her default. Wells Fargo removed the case to federal court and moved for summary judgment, which the c
Payne v. Peninsula School Districtpublic domain
NOONAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting: My colleagues, struggling to find a way between Robb and Witte, find at least “an attempt at an educational program” in a teacher repeatedly locking D.P., a seven-year-old autistic child, into an unventilated, dark space the size of a closet for indeterminate amounts of time, causing D.P. to become so fearful that he routinely urinated and defecated on him
Payne v. Peninsula School Districtpublic domain
ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Payne ex rel. D.P. v. Peninsula School Districtpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Jodi Coy appeals the district court’s denial of summary judgment and qualified immunity. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de novo, Preschooler II v. Clark Cty. Sch. Bd. Of Trs., 479 F.3d 1175, 1179 (9th Cir.2007), we reverse. The case is remanded for further proceedings on Plaintiffs remaining Mo-nell and state law claims. Coy is ent
Shatara Wright v. Michael Stephen Paynepublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00147-CV ___________________________ SHATARA WRIGHT, Appellant V. MICHAEL STEPHEN PAYNE, Appellee On Appeal from the 462nd District Court Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. 16-02115-211 Before Sudderth, C
Austin v. Statepublic domain
Appeal No. 940008 from Judgment dated June 22, 1994; James E. Thomas, Ruling Judge, Harrison County Circuit Court, Second Judicial District. Michael C. Moore, Attorney General, Jolene M. Lowry, Sp. Asst. Attorney General, Jackson, for Appellee. Before FRAISER, C. J., and McMILLIN and PAYNE, JJ. Affirmed. BRIDGES, P. J., and BARBER, COLEMAN, DIAZ, KING
Austin v. Statepublic domain
Appeal No. 4141 from Judgment dated July 2, 1993, Joseph H. Loper, Jr., Ruling Judge, Webster County Circuit Court. Before THOMAS, P.J., and BARBER and DIAZ, JJ. Affirmed. FRAISER, C.J., BRIDGES, P.J., and COLEMAN, KING, McMILLIN, PAYNE and SOUTHWICK, JJ., concur.
Payne v. Statepublic domain
531 N.E.2d 216 (1988) Michael E. PAYNE Defendant-Appellant, v. STATE of Indiana, Plaintiff-Appellee. No. 36A04-8802-CR-56. Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. December 5, 1988. On Rehearing February 15, 1989. Joseph Leon Payne, Austin, for defendant-appellant. Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., Michael A. Schoening, Deputy Atty. Gen., In
Payne v. Statepublic domain
802 S.W.2d 686 (1990) Edward PAYNE, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 68936. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. December 5, 1990. Rehearing Overruled January 30, 1991. Michael R. Maguire, Austin, for appellant. John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty., Winston E. Cochran, Jr. and Lyn McClellan, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston
State v. M. Paynepublic domain
10/05/2021 DA 19-0371 Case Number: DA 19-0371 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2021 MT 256 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICKEY RODNEY PAYNE,
John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Austinpublic domain
916 F.Supp. 158 (1996) JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Barbara L. AUSTIN, Defendant. No. 94-CV-917. United States District Court, N.D. New York. February 8, 1996. *159 Whiteman, Osterman, & Hanna, Albany, NY (Beth A. Bourassa, of counsel), Stevens & Lee, Wayne, PA (William J. Payne, of counsel),
State v. Paynepublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 619 {¶ 1} Appellant, Michael Payne, appeals his conviction from the Summit County Court of Common Pleas. This court affirms. I {¶ 2} Payne was indicted on October 1, 2007 on one count of menacing by stalking in vio
Payne v. Peninsula School Dist.public domain
621 F.3d 1001 (2010) Windy PAYNE, individually and as guardian on behalf of; D.P., a minor child, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PENINSULA SCHOOL DISTRICT, a municipal corporation; Artondale Elementary School, a municipal corporation; Jodi Coy, in her individual *1002 and official capacity; James Coolican, in his individual and official capacity; Jane Does 1-10; John Does 1-10, Defendants-Appellees. <
Hoffman v. Austinpublic domain
147 P.3d 177 (2006) 2006 MT 289 334 Mont. 357 Harold HOFFMAN and Jayne Hoffman, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. James Michael AUSTIN and Hobo Trucking, LLC, Defendants and Respondents. No. 05-634. Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs September 7, 2006. Decided November 8, 2006.
Payne v. Tri-State Careflight, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Opposed Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b) Motion and Supporting Memorandum to Intervene as Parties Plaintiff and Class Representatives, tiled November 29, 2016 (Doc. 151)(“Motion to Intervene”); and (ii) the Opposed Fed. R. Civ. P. 24(b) Supplemental Motion and Supporting Memorandum to Intervene
Michael Gonzalez v. the State of Texaspublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-22-00287-CR Michael Gonzalez, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE 35TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILLS COUNTY NO. 3519, THE HONORABLE MIKE SMITH, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant M
Texas Department of Transportation v. Michael Baggpublic domain
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § No. 08-23-00148-CV TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, § Appeal from the Appellant, § County Court at Law No. 3 v.
Howard, Ex Parte Michael Deepublic domain
KEASLER, J., filed a dissenting opinion. I dissented to the Court’s opinion remanding Michael Howard’s application to the habeas court to address whether Howard’s counsel was ineffective for failing to introduce evidence of Howard’s intoxication-induced insanity at punishment — a claim Howard never asserted. Now that the Court grants relief on this basis, I must dissent once more. On remand, t
Michael Joseph Gowan v. Statepublic domain
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00032-CR ___________________________ MICHAEL JOSEPH GOWAN, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 89th District Court Wichita County, Texas Trial Court No. 30,832-C Before Gabriel, Kerr, and Birdwell, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMOR