Cases

109 P.3d 83 (2005) 210 Ariz. 188 STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Michael Anthony RIVERA, Appellant. No. CR-04-0170-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. April 5, 2005. *84 Terry Goddard, Arizona Attorney General by Randall M. Howe, Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals Section, Phoenix, Attorney for Appellee.

OPINION SNOW, Judge. ¶ 1 Michael Anthony Rivera appeals his convictions and sentences on one count of first-degree murder, one count of first-degree burglary, and one count of kidnapping. We conclude that the trial court erred when it allowed two accomplice witnesses to testify who had entered plea agreements containing consistency provisions when the witnesses had not been informed that the consistency p

*416Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael Anthony Jenkins, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Jenkins’ 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 &

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, United States District Judge In this case, plaintiff, Anthony Rivera, brought an action pro se against JPMorgan Chase. Bank (“Chase”) for damages and in-junctive relief, alleging two violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681s-2(a) and 1681s-2(b), and common law defama

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROY.CE C. LAMBERTH, United States District Judge In this case, plaintiff, Anthony Rivera, brings an action pro se against JPMorgan Chase Bank (“Chase”) for damages and injunctive relief, alleging willful failure to reasonably reinvestigate in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1681s-2(a), negligent failure .to rea

RULING ON DEFENDANT’S PRO SE MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) HAIGHT, Senior District Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Amador Rivera, a federal prisoner, brings the pending pro se motion seeking reduction of his sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which authorizes the court to reduce a sentence that is “based on a s

604 F.Supp.2d 634 (2009) Mable RIVERA et al., Plaintiffs, v. John MATTINGLY et al., Defendants. No. 06 Civ. 7077 (TPG). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 24, 2009. *636 Carolyn A. Kubitschek, Lansner & Kubitschek, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs, Mable Rivera, Anthony Rivera, E.S., and B.C. Jesse Levine,

TERRY, Associate Judge: This is a breach of contract case involving three promissory notes. Appellant Rivera appeals from an order denying his post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. He maintains that the trial court erred when it ruled that the loans at issue did not violate District of Columbia usury laws and upheld the jury verdict, and asks this court to overturn that verdict and reverse the subsequent

MEMORANDUM ** Victor M. Barco-Rivera, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for revie

PER CURIAM. We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation. The State concedes that the sentencing order contains an apparent scrivener’s error since the trial court credited the appellant with all time previously served in prison on the original split-sentence for counts I-IV, but unlike the prison credit blocks on the sentencing order for counts I — III, the prison credit block for count IV was not checked.

MEMORANDUM ** Victor M. Barco-Rivera, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen deportation proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for revie

21-2792-pr Michael Matzell v. Anthony J. Annucci et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2022 (Argued: October 12, 2022 Decided: April 4, 2023) Docket No. 21-2792-pr MICHAEL MATZELL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

286 F.Supp.2d 1299 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Omayra RIVERA, Defendant. No. 02-40137-01-JAR. United States District Court, D. Kansas. October 8, 2003. *1300 Michael S. Holland, Holland & Holland, Russell, KS, for Defendant. Anthony W. Mattivi, Office of United States Attorney, Topeka, KS, for Plaint

McKAY, Circuit Judge. In this § 2255 habeas appeal, Appellant asks us to reverse his conviction for continuing criminal enterprise (“CCE”) on the basis of Richardson v. United States, 526 U.S. 813, 119 S.Ct. 1707, 143 L.Ed.2d 985 (1999). After extensive review of the briefs, the record, and the applicable law, we hold that any alleged Richardson <

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ANTHONY MICHAEL ORTIZ, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. CASE NO. 1D13-6229 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed April 4, 2016. An appea

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 125,092 FAITH RIVERA et al., TOM ALONZO et al., and SUSAN FRICK et al., Appellees, v. SCOTT SCHWAB, Kansas Secretary of State, in His Official Capacity, and MICHAEL ABBOTT, Wyandotte County Election Commissioner, in

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS MICHAEL ANTHONY CARR § AKA MICHEAL ANTHONY CARR, No. 08-11-00315-CR § Appellant, Appeal from the § v.

282 F.3d 74 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.George RIVERA, Ward Johnson, Luis Gautier, Ralph Hernandez, Jamie Cuevas, Victor Briggs, Anthony Briggs, Willie Claussen, Kenroy Prentice, George Vasquez, Elizabeth Velasquez, Desiree Sidberry, Ketty Turino, Andrew Simmons, Ruben Rodriquez, John Marrero, Vicki Dowdy, Madeline Rodriquez, Mark Sanchez, Albert Delmoral, Edgardo Delmoral, Anthony Garay, Veronica Aviles, Matthew Williams, Jonathan

Matter of Anthony M.-B. (Anthony B.) (2022 NY Slip Op 05320) Matter of Anthony M.-B. (Anthony B.) 2022 NY Slip Op 05320 Decided on September 28, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pur

DAUKSCH, Judge. This is an appeal from the trial court's order on petition for writ of certiorari reversing the decision of appellee, the Board of Adjustment, determining the size of and approving fencing for appellant’s, Anthony Rivera’s, junk yard. This case began when Michael May, Zoning Director of Marion County, wrote a letter to Rivera requesting his presence before the Board of Adjustment to discuss the screening of