⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Michael Allen Lamb”

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019-01-30 · Published · cited 95× · 914 F.3d 940
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: *942 Rhonda Lamb alleges that she was injured by inhaling smoke and fumes from her apartment's heating unit after Ashford Place Apartments L.L.C. ("Ashford Place") replaced the unit's motor. She sued Ashford Place, Heather Bamburg, and MRC Development, L.L.C. (
People v. Lambpublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2024-07-11 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL ALLAN LAMB, Defendant and Appellant. S166168 Orange County Superior Court 03CF0441 July 11, 2024 Justice Evans authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Guerrero and Justices Corr
District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1996-11-19 · Published · cited 4× · 947 F. Supp. 1261; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17192; 1996 WL 676740
947 F.Supp. 1261 (1996) Gary LAMB, Dan Rhodes, Jerry Tucker, and Dick Schable, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF DECATUR, Richard Ryan, Police Lieutenant, Sergeant James Chervinko, and others whose identities are yet unknown to the plaintiffs, Defendants. No. 95-2167. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois. November 19, 1996.
Lamb v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988-06-08 · Published · cited 0× · 526 So. 2d 998; 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1367; 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2432; 1988 WL 59575
ON MOTION TO DISMISS PER CURIAM. Because appellant’s sentence has expired, appellee moves to dismiss this appeal as moot. However, as appellant points out, the issues to be raised on appeal challenge the legality of the conviction, rather than the sentence. The-possibility of removing the stigma of a conviction represents a significant practical purpose demonstrating the continuing viability of the app
People v. Allenpublic domain
New York Court of Appeals · 1996-04-30 · Published · cited 18× · 666 N.E.2d 1351; 88 N.Y.2d 831; 644 N.Y.S.2d 478; 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 681
88 N.Y.2d 831 (1996) 666 N.E.2d 1351 644 N.Y.S.2d 478 The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jason Allen, Appellant. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. Argued March 27, 1996. Decided April 30, 1996. Cahn Wishod & Lamb, L. L. P., Melville (Scott M. Karson of counsel), for appellant. <
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997-01-31 · Published · cited 49× · 105 F.3d 1102; 79 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1296; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 1626
105 F.3d 1102 79 A.F.T.R.2d 97-1296, 65 USLW 2524 George R. BAKER, Christine Clawson Brandewie, David J.,Kathleen S. and Louis N. Browning, Hunter W. Clawson,Michael L. Conaton, Paul C. Cramer, Burgess L. Doan, BurgessL. Doan, II, Verna Dohme, John H. Finn, III, John W., RobertW., Thomas R. and William T. Hayden, Joseph P. Hayden, Jr.,Joseph P. Hayden, III, Fred Kahn, James P., William F. andWill
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2001-04-04 · Published · cited 36× · 260 B.R. 517; 2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2737; 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 292; 2001 WL 326698
260 B.R. 517 (2001) In re GENEVA STEEL COMPANY, Debtor. Richard M. Allen, Appellant, v. Geneva Steel Company, Appellee. BAP No. UT-00-070. Bankruptcy No. 99-21130. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit. April 4, 2001. *518 Richard M. Allen, pro se. Steven J. McCardell of LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene &a;
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996-09-11 · Published · cited 0× · 94 F.3d 923; 1996 WL 495553
Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL and Judge MOTZ joined. NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: In 1995, Lloyd’s of London announced a $22 billion “Plan for Reconstruction and Renewal” to restructure the Lloyd’s market’s reinsurance needs and to revitalize the market. The Plan included an offer by Lloyd’s
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978-05-17 · Published · cited 46× · 575 F.2d 1310
SETH, Chief Judge. Appellants, John William Lamb, Michael Todd Clary, Richard Allen Benfield, and Paul Jorgenson, were convicted in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico of a conspiracy to rob, armed robbery, and larceny of a federally insured savings.-and loan institution; kidnapping Marvin Stark from Tucson, Arizona, to Albuquerque, New Mexico, in his car; kidnapping Douglas Keeffe from Albuquer
Supreme Court of Vermont · 1985-09-27 · Published · cited 15× · 503 A.2d 531; 146 Vt. 304; 1985 Vt. LEXIS 434
503 A.2d 531 (1985) PARKER, LAMB & ANKUDA, P.C. v. Walter KRUPINSKY, Jr. No. 83-338. Supreme Court of Vermont. September 27, 1985. *532 Parker, Lamb & Ankuda, P.C., Springfield, for plaintiff-appellee. Michael J. Sheehan, Springfield, for defendant-appellant. Before ALLEN, C.J., and HILL, PECK, GIBSON and HA
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997-08-12 · Published · cited 0× · 975 F. Supp. 802; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12231; 1997 WL 528385
MEMORANDUM OPINION PAYNE, District Judge. The plaintiffs, hereinafter referred to as “Names,” have filed a Motion For Attorney’s Fees seeking an award of the attorney’s fees and litigation costs incurred prosecuting this action. The claim to attorney’s fees is made pursuant to the “common benefit” doctrine, which permits a plaintiff to obtain reimbursement of attorney’s fees and expenses under limited cir
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-11-01 · Published · cited 15× · 120 F.4th 1346
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MICHAEL RAY FUQUA, AKA No. 21-15492 Michael Fuqua, D.C. No. 2:18-cv- Plaintiff-Appellant, 02337-DJH v. OPINION RAAK, Psychologist; D. WEBSTER, Ph.D.; HIGUERA; JONES; SUCKLE, Captain; TROMAN, CO III; MOONEY, D.W.; GOLDER, ADW; SHAW, Ph.D.; SWIRSKY, Captain; HUDSON, CO III; HORN, Lt.; METZLER,
Allen v. Bowenpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987-03-10 · Published · cited 0× · 657 F. Supp. 148; 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1832; 17 Soc. Serv. Rev. 628
657 F.Supp. 148 (1987) Edmund ALLEN, Gerome Allen and Henri Allen, by Geraldine Allen, their mother and next friend, Plaintiffs, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant. No. 85 C 8031. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. March 10, 1987. Reconsideration Denied June 8, 1987. *149<
Allen v. Bowenpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987-06-08 · Published · cited 0× · 663 F. Supp. 471; 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4824; 18 Soc. Serv. Rev. 647
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MORAN, District Judge. The Secretary moves for reconsideration of this court’s decision in Allen v. Bowen, 657 F.Supp. 148 (N.D.Ill.1987). He contends that the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) applied the proper burden of proof under the state law alternative for determining eligibility for child’s insurance benefits under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 416(h)(2)(A), an
Weber v. Lambepublic domain
Kentucky Supreme Court · 2017-03-23 · Published · cited 0× · 513 S.W.3d 912; 2017 WL 1102821; 2017 Ky. LEXIS 89
OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE KELLER Jude Weber and Thomas Francis Lam-be cross-appeal the decision of the Court of Appeals to reverse in part and affirm in part the Jefferson Family Court. This Court granted discretionary review, and for the reasons stated herein, we affirm in part and reverse in part the opinion of the Court of Appeals. *914<
District Court, M.D. Florida · 2006-04-21 · Published · cited 0× · 429 F. Supp. 2d 1302; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22056; 2006 WL 1118910
429 F.Supp.2d 1302 (2006) Dana LAMB, and Access Now, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. CHARLOTTE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Defendant. No. 2:05-cv-93-FtM-33DNF. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division. April 21, 2006. *1303 *1304 Stephan Michael Nitz, G
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2023-11-15 · Published · cited 0×
SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. State v. Michael Olenowski (A-56-18) (082253) Re-Argued June 1, 2023 -- Decided November 15, 2023 SABATINO, P.J.A.D. (temporarily assigned), writing for the Court. In State v. Olenowski
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2024-05-30 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued May 30, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00366-CR ——————————— TODD MICHAEL GLOVER, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2022-04-07 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE November 16, 2021 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL DILLON LAMBDIN r-~~~~~~-- FILED Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 107896 Steven W. Sword, Judge APR 0 7
Allen v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida · 2013-07-11 · Published · cited 6× · 137 So. 3d 946; 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 592; 2013 WL 3466777; 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1421
PER CURIAM. This case is before the Court on appeal from a judgment of convictions of first-degree murder and kidnapping and a sentence of death. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the reasons that follow, we affirm Allen’s convictions and sentences. *951FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On March 8, 2