Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
15 opinions for “Michael A. Morales and Yadira Morales”
Opinion issued November 26, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00827-CV ——————————— JASON ALEXANDER, JOE MCADAMS, ELIAS ABRAHAM, LAWRENCE ANDERSON, LISA ASTIN, JORGE ATENCIO, DAVID AYRE, DOUGLAS AUSTIN, JAMES BARCLIFT, MARTIN BENSON, MARIA BLACKWELL, T
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
Opinion issued December 16, 2025. In the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00827-CV ——————————— JASON ALEXANDER, JOE MCADAMS, ELIAS ABRAHAM, LAWRENCE ANDERSON, LISA ASTIN, JORGE ATENCIO, DAVID AYRE, DOUGLAS AUSTIN, JAMES BARCLIFT, MARTIN BENSON, MARIA BLACKW
Opinion issued December 9, 2025. In the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-22-00827-CV ——————————— JASON ALEXANDER, JOE MCADAMS, ELIAS ABRAHAM, LAWRENCE ANDERSON, LISA ASTIN, JORGE ATENCIO, DAVID AYRE, DOUGLAS AUSTIN, JAMES BARCLIFT, MARTIN BENSON, MARIA BLACKWELL
Salomon Ledezma-Cosino v. Jefferson Sessionspublic domain
THOMAS, Chief Judge, with whom CHRISTEN, Circuit Judge, joins, dissenting: The government proposes to bar the petitioner from immigration relief simply because is he a recovering alcoholic. It reasons that, because he was diagnosed with the disease during the qualifying period, he categorically must be labeled a “habitual drunkard,” and is per se ineligible for cancellation of removal as someone who l
People v. Riverapublic domain
Opinion of the Court by Liu, J. *314 Defendant Cuitlahuac Tahua Rivera was convicted and sentenced to death for the murder of Stephan Gene Gray, a peace officer. ( Pen. Code, §§ 187, 189.) The jury found true special circumstance allegations that (1) the murder was committed for the purpose
Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder
FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
United States v. Carrillopublic domain
123 F.Supp.2d 1223 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Manuel Guillermo CARRILLO, a/k/a "Psycho," a/k/a "Memo," Hector Hinojosa Gonzalez, a/k/a "Hector Hinojosa," a/k/a "Antonio Rameroz," a/k/a "Manuel Gonzalez," Raul Atayde, a/k/a "Bam Bam," Andres Jaquin Luna III, a/k/a "Buddha," Emiliano Zapata Licon, a/k/a "Zap," Roger Jiron, Juan Castorena, a/k/a "Chuco," Augustine Olivas, a/k/a "Chucky," Oscar Pacheco-Vasquez, a/k/a "Loco," Jose
Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ELEANOR ABRAHAM, ET AL., CASE NO. SX-11-CV-0000550 Plaintiffs, ACTION FOR: DAMAGES vs. ST. CROIX RENAISSANCE GROUP, LLLP, Defendant. NOTICE OF ENTRY OF MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TO: JUDGES AND MAGISTRATE JUDGES OF THE SUPERIOR COURT LEE J. ROHN, ESQ. JOEL H. HOLT, ESQ. CARL J. HARTMANN III, ESQ. IT/LAW CLERKS/LAW LIBRARY ORDER BOOK PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on February 03, 2020 a(n) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER dated Fe
People v. Carterpublic domain
135 Cal.Rptr.2d 553 (2003) 30 Cal.4th 1166 70 P.3d 981 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Tracey Lavell CARTER, Defendant and Appellant. No. S015381. Supreme Court of California. June 19, 2003. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing August 13, 2003. Certiorari Denied January 12, 2004. <
Salazar v. District of Columbiapublic domain
938 F.Supp. 926 (1996) Oscar SALAZAR, Jr. et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al., Defendants. No. CA 93-452. United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 11, 1996. *927 *928 *929
Salazar v. District of Columbiapublic domain
954 F.Supp. 278 (1996) Oscar SALAZAR, Jr. et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 93-452 (GK). United States District Court, District of Columbia. October 16, 1996. *279 *280 Nancy S. Schultz, A