Cases

Glickman, Associate Judge: Appellant Michael A. Jones was tried in Superior Court in October 1996 and convicted of armed robbery and other offenses. The present appeal is from the court's denial of his motions to vacate his convictions pursuant to D.C. Code § 23-110

WASHINGTON, Chief Judge: A unanimous jury convicted appellant Michael A. Hartley of one count each of assault with intent to commit robbery while armed (“AWIRWA”), 1 assault with significant bodily injury (“felony assault”), 2 malicious destruction of property

515 S.E.2d 780 (1999) 30 Va. App. 95 Robert A. BLACKBURN v. Joan Lavonne MICHAEL. Record No. 0259-98-3. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Salem. June 29, 1999. *782 Franklin R. Blatt, Harrisonburg (Christopher J. Smith, on brief), for appellant. Walter F. Green, IV (Green & O'Donnell, on brief), Har

Affirmed.

SALMON, J. David and Brigitte Blackburn filed a complaint for declaratory relief against Erie Insurance Exchange (hereinafter “Erie”).1 Erie filed an answer to the complaint and subse*506quently the parties entered into a stipulation of facts that reads as follows:

PER CURIAM: Joseph Blackburn, Sr., appeals a district court judgment dismissing his complaint as barred by the statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Blackburn v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., No. CA-04-65-2 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequat

10 Cal.Rptr.3d 696 (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 670 David A. BLACKBURN, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Michael BRADY, Defendant and Appellant. No. D042010. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One. March 4, 2004. *697 Estes & Hoyt and Kevin J. Hoyt, San Diego, for Defendant and Appellant. Vivoli &

08/31/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 1, 2022 DAVID A. AVERY v. CHERYL A. BLACKBURN ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 21C751 Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr., Judge ___________________________________

District of Columbia Court of Appeals No. 12-CF-1433 APR 14 2016 MICHAEL WONSON, Appellant, v. FEL-7080-00 UNITED STATES, Appellee. On Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia

776 F.Supp. 283 (1991) James Allen DOWELL, Plaintiff, v. C.V. BLACKBURN, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 89-251-R. United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Charlottesville Division. August 12, 1991. James Allen Dowell, pro se. Edward M. Macon, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmond, Va., and Mark R. Davis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, Va., for defen

NEBEKER, Senior Judge: This case presents an appeal from a trial court’s reconsideration of a prematurely granted order allowing appellant to withdraw his original valid plea of guilty (before sentence). The withdrawal motion was filed nearly two months after the plea was entered. The trial court judge granted withdrawal without the benefit of an evi-dentiary hearing to enquir

ORDER PER CURIAM On further consideration of this court’s October 20, 2011, order that granted petitioner’s petition for reinstatement subject to conditions, this court’s February 11, 2014 order that directed petitioner to show cause why his reinstatement should not be revoked, and the resppnses of petitioner and Bar Counsel, it is

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS Nos. 09-CF-1438, 10-CF-54, 09-CF-1439, 10-CF-55, 09-CF-1450, 09-CF-1469, 09-CF-1482, 09-CF-1483, & 10-CF-120 MICHAEL D. TANN, LANNELL COOPER, ANTONIO ARNETTE, JAMES RUSHI

District of Columbia Court of Appeals No. 14-CV-1350 OCT 20 2016 MOTOROLA INC., et al., Appellants, v. CAB-8479-01 MICHAEL PATRICK MURRAY, et al., Appellees. On Appeal from the Superior Court o

MEMORANDUM RULING JOHN V. PARKER, Chief Judge. This matter is before the court upon the Second Supplemental Magistrate’s Report of United States Magistrate Stephen C. Riedlinger, dated January 9, 1991.1 Objections have been filed by plaintiff, by inter-venor, J. Courtney Wilson (plaintiff’s former attorney), and by defendants, David Bonnette and Robert Rowe.

MEMORANDUM ** Craig Lanser appeals pro se the dismissal of his action under the False Claims Act against David and Diane Blackburn, his former employers, alleging that they engaged in a scheme to defraud the Small Business Administration by falsifying loan documents and providing unlawful kickbacks. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. See Littlejohn v. United States,

OPINION GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge. Under what circumstances are volunteers protected from employment discrimination by Title VII? That is the primary, though not only, question presented in this case. Sister Michael Marie and Sister Mary Cabrini were disaster relief volunteers for the American Red Cross and the Ross County Emergency Managemen

925 F.Supp. 118 (1996) E. Michael BLACKBURN, Trustee, John Holcomb, Trustee, Mario J. Bertolini, Trustee, Robert Canning, Trustee, Thomas Cody, Trustee, Michael Coyne, Trustee, Andrew E. Esposito, Trustee, and Vincent Noce, Trustee, Plaintiffs, v. Jeffrey J. IVERSEN and Debra K. Iversen, Defendants. No. 3: 95 CV 2026. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. May 6, 1996.</

KING, Senior Judge: On June 5, 2009, Lawrence A. Hubb was injured when Gregg Mutter’s vehicle rear-ended Hubb’s vehicle in Montgomery County, Maryland. At the time of the collision, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company covered Hubb’s vehicle and Erie Insurance Company covered Mutter’s vehicle. Soon after the accident, Hubb claimed no-fault personal injury protection (“PIP”) b

WALKER, Judge. On 3 May 1999, plaintiff filed this action seeking a declaratory judgment that the policy of automobile insurance issued by defendant provided underinsured motorists (UIM) coverage to plaintiff on 26 March 1998 because the purported UIM and uninsured (UM) selection/rejection form executed by plaintiff’s husband (Mr. Blackburn) was invalid. Mr. Blackburn procured automobile insuranc