Cases

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 14-0929 ULYSSES COPELAND, APPELLANT, V. ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Cleveland Darnell Copeland appeals the district court’s denial of his motions for reduction of sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Cleveland Darnell Copeland appeals the district court’s denial of his motions for reduction of sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

685 F.Supp.2d 498 (2010) Christopher COPELAND, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. FORTIS, Fortis Bank S.A./N.V., Fortis NV, Herman Verwilst, Jean-Paul Votron, Maurice Lippens, Gilbert Mittler, and Filip Dierckx, Defendants. No. 08 Civ. 9060(DC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 18, 2010.

PER CURIAM. Terry Wendell Copeland appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Copeland v. Hurley, No. CA-05-10-AMD (D.Md. Jan. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

OPINION Michael Copeland has filed a petition asking this court to issue a writ of mandamus ordering the district judge to vacate or rescind his order compelling arbitration with Stanley Transportation, Inc. (Stanley). In the underlying action, Copeland signed an agreement with his employer to arbitrate any tort action that he might subsequently have as a result of his employment. The arbitration agreement is a part of a larger document entitled "Stanley Transp

Farmer, Judge. {¶ 1} On September 8, 1977, appellant, Thomas Copeland, sustained an injury while at work. Appellant filed a workers’ compensation claim, which was allowed *587 for “sprain/contusion left knee with fragments left patella; prepatellar burs

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice, concurring in part; dissenting in part. I agree with the majority on all points of appeal except its disposition of Mr. Copeland’s argument that during the guilt-innocence phase of the trial the lower court erred by refusing to admit psychiatric testimony to negate the essential element of purposeful intent as to the1 offense of first-degre

336 F.Supp.2d 223 (2004) UNITED STATES of America v. Edward COPELAND, Virgil Rivers and Robertino Vasquez, Defendants. No. 03-CR-1120. United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 20, 2004. Alyssa A. Qualls, New York, NY, for Plaintiff. Michael Padden, Brooklyn, NY; and Paul J. McAllister, New York, NY, for Defendants. MEMORANDUM &am;

Opinion by BAY MITCHELL, Presiding Judge. 1 Tela Corporation, d/b/a Red Dog Café or "Red Dog" seeks review of an order entering judgment on a jury verdict in favor of Roy Copeland, Plaintiff/Appellee or "Copeland." Copeland brought an action under a dram shop liability theory as recognized in Brigance v. Velvet Dove Restaurant, 1986 OK 41, 725 P.2d 300, 304. The jury awarded Copeland damages for injuries r

*********** Based upon information contained in I.C. File LH-0328 and upon an investigation made by the Investigations Section of the Industrial Commission, the Full Commission makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Decedent, Michael Wayne Copeland, was a Captain in the City of Charlotte Fire Department at the time of his death on 25 January 2003. 2. Decedent's death occurred in

246 F.Supp.2d 183 (2003) Richard COPELAND [1], A42-260-351 Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, James W. Zigler, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service, M. Frances Holmes, Buffalo District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, and United States Department of Justice, Respondents. No. 02-CV-61151 (CJS)(B). United States District Court,

LANDAU, P. J. Petitioner seeks reversal of a judgment denying him post-conviction relief and requiring him to pay $975 in fees for his court-appointed attorney. We affirm, writing to address only the payment of attorney fees. In 1997, petitioner was charged with two counts of second-degree robbery, two counts of possession of a controlled substance, and one count of unauthorized use of a vehicle. He pleaded

OPINION AND ORDER LEISURE, District Judge. The Court is faced with plaintiffs counsel’s repeated failure to comply with the deadlines and orders of this Court. On three occasions, the Court has warned plaintiffs counsel that her dilatory manner of proceeding and her failure to heed the Court’s orders would result in dismissal of plaintiffs suit. Having considered counsel’s most recent transgres

PER CURIAM. Terry Wendell Copeland appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Copeland v. Division of Corr., No. CA-00-394-AMD (D.Md. filed Jan. 9, 2001; entered Jan. 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argu

DAVIS, Judge. Appellant, Ronald Curley Copeland, Jr., seeks review of his judgment of conviction and sentence for possession of marijuana and violation of probation, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. Because the evidence was obtained as a result of an invalid frisk, we reverse. Testimony offered at the suppression hearing revealed that two deputy sheriffs of th

983 S.W.2d 703 (1998) STATE of Tennessee, Appellee, v. Bill COPELAND and Grayland Darty, Appellants. Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville. April 3, 1998. No Application for Permission to Appeal Filed. *705 David Brady, Public Defender, H. Marshall Judd, Asst. Public Defender, Cookeville, TN, for defendant Copeland

949 S.W.2d 783 (1997) Walter G. LIBHART, et al., Appellants, v. Claudell COPELAND, et al., Appellees. No. 10-96-005-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Waco. July 16, 1997. *789 Cynthia A. Scheopner, Waco, for appellants. Michael L. Scanes & Keith Cameron, Naman, Howell, Smith & Lee, P.C., Waco, for appellees. Be

PER CURIAM: David Adams appeals the ninety-two-month sentence he received after he pled guilty to possession of a stolen firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922®. He asserts that the district court’s application of U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(4), which provides for a two-level enhancement for offenses involving stolen firearms, constitutes

996 P.2d 931 (1999) 1999 OK 81 Roy COPELAND, Appellant, v. TELA CORPORATION, d/b/a Red Dog Saloon and Café, and Donald E. Mackey, individually, Appellees. No. 92,283. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. October 5, 1999. As Corrected October 12, 1999. Rehearing Denied April 4, 2000. Doug Friesen, Oklahoma City, Oklahom