Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
19 opinions for “Miceli v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.”
ACCEPTED 12-11-00303-cv TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 3/13/2015 4:46:09 PM
Estate of Schwarz v. Philip Morris Inc.public domain
135 P.3d 409 (2006) 206 Or. App. 20 The ESTATE OF Michelle SCHWARZ, Deceased, by and through her Personal Representative Paul Scott Schwarz, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, v. Philip Morris Incorporated, a foreign corporation, Appellant-Cross-Respondent, and Roths I.G.A. Foodliner, Incorporated, an Oregon Corporation, Defendant. 0002-01376; A118589. Court of Appeals of Orego
719 F.2d 525 The ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK STATE, a/k/a The OneidaIndian Nation of New York, a/k/a The Oneida Indians of NewYork; The Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin, a/k/a TheOneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin, Inc.; and The Oneidaof the Thames Band Council, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees,v.The COUNTY OF ONEIDA, New York and The County of Madison,New York, Defendants-Third PartyPlaintiffs-Appelle
United States v. Fullmerpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge: Defendants Darius Fullmer, Andrew Stepanian, Kevin Kjonaas, Joshua Harper, Lauren Gazzola, Jacob Conroy, and Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (“SHAC”) collectively challenge their convictions for conspiracy to violate the Animal Enterprise Protection Act (“AEPA”), 18 U.S.C. § 43 (2002). Notably, our interpretation of this statute is an issue of first impression in this
Tucci v. District of Columbiapublic domain
956 A.2d 684 (2008) Michael E. TUCCI and Amy C. Tucci, Appellants, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee. No. 06-CV-1344. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued February 22, 2008. Decided September 18, 2008. *687 Michael E. Tucci, Washington, for appellants. Catherine Ferrando, Assistant Attorney Genera
United States v. Santiago-Mendezpublic domain
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge, opinion of the court except as to Part II.B, Part II.C.l, and Part II.C.2; Dissenting in Part II.B, Part II.C.1, and Part II.C.2.1 “Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?”2 We are presented with highly troubling instances of abuses of police power, including the disturbing practice, conducted by certain members of the
Porter v. Schafferpublic domain
728 A.2d 755 (1999) 126 Md. App. 237 Alan H. PORTER v. Genevieve Yonkers SCHAFFER. No. 773, Sept. Term, 1998. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. April 29, 1999. *758 Robert H. Reinhart (Walsh, Walsh & Reinhart, P.C., on the brief), Cumberland, for Appellant. Robert O. Kazary, Cumberland, for
Sierra Club v. Robertsonpublic domain
784 F.Supp. 593 (1991) SIERRA CLUB, Jerry Williams, Defenders of the Ouachita Forest, Sherry Balkenhol, Bill Greer, Stan Heard, Plaintiffs, v. F. Dale ROBERTSON, in his official capacity as Chief, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, John E. Alcock, in his official capacity as Regional Forester, Southern Region, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, John M. Curran, in his official capacity as Supervisor, Ouachita National Forest, Larry Theivagt, in his official capacity
Portland Audubon Society v. Lujanpublic domain
712 F.Supp. 1456 (1989) PORTLAND AUDUBON SOCIETY, Headwaters, Lane County Audubon Society, Oregon Natural Resources Council, the Wilderness Society, Sierra Club, Inc., Siskiyou Audubon Society, Central Oregon Audubon Society, Kalmiopsis Audubon Society, Umpqua Valley Audubon Society, Natural Resources Defense Council, Plaintiffs, v. Manuel LUJAN, Jr., in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Interior, Defendant, and<
Perrine v. EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND CO.public domain
694 S.E.2d 815 (2010) Lenora PERRINE; Carolyn Holbert; Waunona Messinger Crouser; Rebeccah Morlock; Anthony Beezel; Mary Montgomery; Mary Luzader; Truman R. Desist; Larry Beezel; and Joseph Bradshaw; individuals residing in West Virginia, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs below, Appellants in no. 34333, Appellees in nos. 34334 and 34335, v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, a Delaware corporation doing busin
AMENDED MEMORANDUM, ORDER and JUDGMENT WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. [[Image here]] *14[[Image here]] *15[[Image here]] I.Introduction This case involves claims by Vietnamese nationals and an organization, The Vietnamese
Bates v. United Statespublic domain
517 F.Supp. 1350 (1981) Marjorie BATES, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Juanita Ann DECKARD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. A. Nos. 78-3205-CV-S, 78-3212-CV-S. United States District Court, W. D. Missouri, S. D. July 20, 1981. *1351 William H. Sanders, Karl Zobrist,
Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneidapublic domain
LUMBARD, Circuit Judge: All three parties appeal from the judgment of the Northern District of New York, Edmund J. Port, Judge. The defendants, Counties of Oneida and Madison, New York, appeal from Judge Port’s decision holding them liable for wrongful possession of plaintiffs’ land. 434 F.Supp. 527 (N.D.N. Y.1977). Plaintiffs Oneida Indian Nation of New York State, Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin, and Oneida of t
Grubbs v. Bradleypublic domain
552 F.Supp. 1052 (1982) Scotty GRUBBS, Norman Q. Wright, Elbert Thompson, Debra M. Walling and Stanley Scott, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated v. Harold B. BRADLEY, Lamar Alexander, Robert Morford, Catherine Walton, Dorothy Greer, John Moore, J. Larry Daniels, Marian Hills, Evans Fine, Jamie S. Brodie,[*] Ronald Bishop, Robert Waller, Glenn Rogers, Robert C. McElrath, Robert Childress, Jim Rose, Charles B. Bass, He
ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL
ACCEPTED 13-15-00167-CV FILED THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS IN THE 13TH COURT OF APPEALS
Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical Corp.public domain
647 F.Supp. 303 (1986) Woodrow STERLING, et al, Plaintiffs, v. VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 78-1100. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, E.D. August 1, 1986. *304 *305 *306 James S. Wilder, III, Somerville, Tenn., Sidney W. Gilrea
In Re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigationpublic domain
373 F.Supp.2d 7 (2005) In re "AGENT ORANGE" PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION. The Vietnam Association for Victims of Agent Orange/Dioxin; Phan Thi Phi Phi; Nguyen Van Quy and Vu Thi Loan, Individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians of Nguyen Quang Trung and Nguyen Thi Thuy Nga, Their Children; Duong Quynh Hoa, Individually and as Administratix of the Estate of Her Deceased Child, Huynh Trung Son; Ho Kan Hai, Individually and as Parent and Natural G
In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigationpublic domain
597 F.Supp. 740 (1984) In re "AGENT ORANGE" PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 381. United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 25, 1984 as Modified. *741 *742 *743 Stephen J. Schlegel, Schlegel & Trafelet, Ltd., Chicago, Ill.; Benton Musslewhite,