⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

19 opinions for “Miceli v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.”

Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2015-03-13 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 12-11-00303-cv TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 3/13/2015 4:46:09 PM
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006-05-17 · Published · cited 30× · 135 P.3d 409; 206 Or. App. 20; 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 667
135 P.3d 409 (2006) 206 Or. App. 20 The ESTATE OF Michelle SCHWARZ, Deceased, by and through her Personal Representative Paul Scott Schwarz, Respondent-Cross-Appellant, v. Philip Morris Incorporated, a foreign corporation, Appellant-Cross-Respondent, and Roths I.G.A. Foodliner, Incorporated, an Oregon Corporation, Defendant. 0002-01376; A118589. Court of Appeals of Orego
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983-09-29 · Published · cited 41× · 719 F.2d 525; 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16420
719 F.2d 525 The ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK STATE, a/k/a The OneidaIndian Nation of New York, a/k/a The Oneida Indians of NewYork; The Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin, a/k/a TheOneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin, Inc.; and The Oneidaof the Thames Band Council, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees,v.The COUNTY OF ONEIDA, New York and The County of Madison,New York, Defendants-Third PartyPlaintiffs-Appelle
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009-10-14 · Published · cited 41× · 584 F.3d 132; 50 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 659; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 22515; 2009 WL 3273955
OPINION OF THE COURT FUENTES, Circuit Judge: Defendants Darius Fullmer, Andrew Stepanian, Kevin Kjonaas, Joshua Harper, Lauren Gazzola, Jacob Conroy, and Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (“SHAC”) collectively challenge their convictions for conspiracy to violate the Animal Enterprise Protection Act (“AEPA”), 18 U.S.C. § 43 (2002). Notably, our interpretation of this statute is an issue of first impression in this
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008-09-18 · Published · cited 26× · 956 A.2d 684; 2008 D.C. App. LEXIS 401; 2008 WL 4239162
956 A.2d 684 (2008) Michael E. TUCCI and Amy C. Tucci, Appellants, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee. No. 06-CV-1344. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued February 22, 2008. Decided September 18, 2008. *687 Michael E. Tucci, Washington, for appellants. Catherine Ferrando, Assistant Attorney Genera
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012-08-10 · Published · cited 88× · 691 F.3d 1
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge, opinion of the court except as to Part II.B, Part II.C.l, and Part II.C.2; Dissenting in Part II.B, Part II.C.1, and Part II.C.2.1 “Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?”2 We are presented with highly troubling instances of abuses of police power, including the disturbing practice, conducted by certain members of the
Porter v. Schafferpublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999-04-29 · Published · cited 29× · 728 A.2d 755; 126 Md. App. 237; 1999 Md. App. LEXIS 85
728 A.2d 755 (1999) 126 Md. App. 237 Alan H. PORTER v. Genevieve Yonkers SCHAFFER. No. 773, Sept. Term, 1998. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. April 29, 1999. *758 Robert H. Reinhart (Walsh, Walsh & Reinhart, P.C., on the brief), Cumberland, for Appellant. Robert O. Kazary, Cumberland, for
District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1991-11-27 · Published · cited 28× · 784 F. Supp. 593; 1991 WL 321195
784 F.Supp. 593 (1991) SIERRA CLUB, Jerry Williams, Defenders of the Ouachita Forest, Sherry Balkenhol, Bill Greer, Stan Heard, Plaintiffs, v. F. Dale ROBERTSON, in his official capacity as Chief, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, John E. Alcock, in his official capacity as Regional Forester, Southern Region, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, John M. Curran, in his official capacity as Supervisor, Ouachita National Forest, Larry Theivagt, in his official capacity
District Court, D. Oregon · 1989-05-18 · Published · cited 11× · 712 F. Supp. 1456; 19 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21230; 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5551; 1989 WL 53470
712 F.Supp. 1456 (1989) PORTLAND AUDUBON SOCIETY, Headwaters, Lane County Audubon Society, Oregon Natural Resources Council, the Wilderness Society, Sierra Club, Inc., Siskiyou Audubon Society, Central Oregon Audubon Society, Kalmiopsis Audubon Society, Umpqua Valley Audubon Society, Natural Resources Defense Council, Plaintiffs, v. Manuel LUJAN, Jr., in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Interior, Defendant, and<
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2010-06-02 · Published · cited 17× · 694 S.E.2d 815; 225 W. Va. 482; 2010 W. Va. LEXIS 97
694 S.E.2d 815 (2010) Lenora PERRINE; Carolyn Holbert; Waunona Messinger Crouser; Rebeccah Morlock; Anthony Beezel; Mary Montgomery; Mary Luzader; Truman R. Desist; Larry Beezel; and Joseph Bradshaw; individuals residing in West Virginia, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs below, Appellants in no. 34333, Appellees in nos. 34334 and 34335, v. E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, a Delaware corporation doing busin
District Court, E.D. New York · 2005-03-10 · Published · cited 2× · 373 F. Supp. 2d 7; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3644; 2005 WL 729177
AMENDED MEMORANDUM, ORDER and JUDGMENT WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. [[Image here]] *14[[Image here]] *15[[Image here]] I.Introduction This case involves claims by Vietnamese nationals and an organization, The Vietnamese
District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1981-07-20 · Published · cited 4× · 517 F. Supp. 1350; 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14579
517 F.Supp. 1350 (1981) Marjorie BATES, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Juanita Ann DECKARD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. A. Nos. 78-3205-CV-S, 78-3212-CV-S. United States District Court, W. D. Missouri, S. D. July 20, 1981. *1351 William H. Sanders, Karl Zobrist,
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983-09-29 · Published · cited 12× · 719 F.2d 525
LUMBARD, Circuit Judge: All three parties appeal from the judgment of the Northern District of New York, Edmund J. Port, Judge. The defendants, Counties of Oneida and Madison, New York, appeal from Judge Port’s decision holding them liable for wrongful possession of plaintiffs’ land. 434 F.Supp. 527 (N.D.N. Y.1977). Plaintiffs Oneida Indian Nation of New York State, Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin, and Oneida of t
Grubbs v. Bradleypublic domain
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1982-08-13 · Published · cited 107× · 552 F. Supp. 1052
552 F.Supp. 1052 (1982) Scotty GRUBBS, Norman Q. Wright, Elbert Thompson, Debra M. Walling and Stanley Scott, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated v. Harold B. BRADLEY, Lamar Alexander, Robert Morford, Catherine Walton, Dorothy Greer, John Moore, J. Larry Daniels, Marian Hills, Evans Fine, Jamie S. Brodie,[*] Ronald Bishop, Robert Waller, Glenn Rogers, Robert C. McElrath, Robert Childress, Jim Rose, Charles B. Bass, He
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1986-08-01 · Published · cited 20× · 647 F. Supp. 303; 24 ERC 2017; 17 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20081; 24 ERC (BNA) 2017; 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21973
647 F.Supp. 303 (1986) Woodrow STERLING, et al, Plaintiffs, v. VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 78-1100. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, E.D. August 1, 1986. *304 *305 *306 James S. Wilder, III, Somerville, Tenn., Sidney W. Gilrea
District Court, E.D. New York · 2005-03-28 · Published · cited 26× · 373 F. Supp. 2d 7; 2005 WL 729177
373 F.Supp.2d 7 (2005) In re "AGENT ORANGE" PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION. The Vietnam Association for Victims of Agent Orange/Dioxin; Phan Thi Phi Phi; Nguyen Van Quy and Vu Thi Loan, Individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians of Nguyen Quang Trung and Nguyen Thi Thuy Nga, Their Children; Duong Quynh Hoa, Individually and as Administratix of the Estate of Her Deceased Child, Huynh Trung Son; Ho Kan Hai, Individually and as Parent and Natural G
District Court, E.D. New York · 1984-09-25 · Published · cited 214× · 597 F. Supp. 740; 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23337
597 F.Supp. 740 (1984) In re "AGENT ORANGE" PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 381. United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 25, 1984 as Modified. *741 *742 *743 Stephen J. Schlegel, Schlegel & Trafelet, Ltd., Chicago, Ill.; Benton Musslewhite,