⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Mercer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.”

Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013-12-19 · Published · cited 10× · 2013 Ohio 5607
[Cite as Mercer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2013-Ohio-5607.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Sue E. Mercer, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 13AP-447 v. : (C.P.C. No. 12CVC-05-5954) Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al.,
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009-01-06 · Published · cited 23× · 961 A.2d 1016; 112 Conn. App. 8; 2009 Conn. App. LEXIS 11
961 A.2d 1016 (2009) 112 Conn.App. 8 Rita PEATIE v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. No. 28387. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued September 25, 2008. Decided January 6, 2009. *1019 Heidi J. Alexander, for the appellant (plaintiff). Anita M. Varunes, with whom was Timothy P. Knotts, for th
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2009-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008-09-23 · Published · cited 67× · 452 Mass. 337
Marshall, C.J. In this putative class action, the named plaintiffs are former employees of the defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart), who were paid by the hour (hourly employees). On behalf of themselves and others similarly situated they allege that Wal-Mart wrongfully withheld compensation for time worked and denied or cut short rest and meal breaks to which they were entitled. The plaintiffs appealed from a Superior Cou
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2009-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG NUMBER 13-08-00501-CV ALVINO CHACON, Appellant, v. ANDREWS DISTRIBUTING COMPANY LTD. AND ROBERT SANCHEZ, Appellees. NUMBER 13-08-00558-CV ALVINO CHACON, Appellant, v
Supreme Court of Florida · 2005-07-07 · Published · cited 37× · 908 So. 2d 342; 30 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 536; 2005 Fla. LEXIS 1457; 2005 WL 1575772
908 So.2d 342 (2005) Ronna MARTINO, et al., Petitioners, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Respondent. No. SC03-334. Supreme Court of Florida. July 7, 2005. Philip M. Burlington of Caruso, Burlington, Bohn and Compiani, P.A., and Steven *343 W. Halvorson of Schuler and Halvorson, P.A., West Palm Beach, FL, for Petitioner. Rosemary
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2003-12-04 · Published · cited 3× · 592 S.E.2d 824; 215 W. Va. 45; 20 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1199; 2003 W. Va. LEXIS 154
592 S.E.2d 824 (2003) 215 W.Va. 45 Stephanie D. BAUGHMAN, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant Below, Appellee. No. 31312. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted November 18, 2003. Decided December 4, 2003.
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2014-07-29 · Published · cited 4× · 62 F. Supp. 3d 569; 2014 WL 3746788; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102979
MEMORANDUM ORDER MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report of the Magistrate Judge which contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action has been presented for consideration. Plaint
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-05-28 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RODERICK MAGADIA, individually No. 19-16184 and on behalf of all those similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 5:17-cv-00062- LHK v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., a OPINION Delaware corporation;
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-05-28 · Published · cited 106× · 999 F.3d 668
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RODERICK MAGADIA, individually No. 19-16184 and on behalf of all those similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 5:17-cv-00062- LHK v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., a OPINION Delaware corporation;
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998-01-27 · Published · cited 2× · 496 S.E.2d 499; 230 Ga. App. 474; 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 494; 1998 Ga. App. LEXIS 132
496 S.E.2d 499 (1998) 230 Ga. App. 474 BROGDON v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al. No. A97A2091. Court of Appeals of Georgia. January 27, 1998. Reconsideration Denied February 6, 1998. Certiorari Denied May 14, 1998. Clark & Clark, Fred S. Clark, Savannah, for appellant. Karsman, Brooks & Callaway,
District Court, W.D. New York · 1998-06-04 · Published · cited 3× · 8 F. Supp. 2d 235; 1998 WL 317576
8 F.Supp.2d 235 (1998) Betty J. NASCA, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant. No. 96-CV-6557. United States District Court, W.D. New York. June 4, 1998. Jeanne Colombo, Rochester, NY, for Plaintiff. Michael J. Kanaley, Jr., Cheryl Meyers, Kenney, Kanaley, Shelton & Liptak, LLP, Buffalo, NY, for Defendant. DECISION and ORDER <
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999-05-03 · Published · cited 85× · 729 A.2d 1006; 158 N.J. 263; 1999 N.J. LEXIS 541; 76 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 46,063; 83 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1425
The opinion of the Court was delivered by O’HERN, J. This is an employment-practices claim under New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -49. The plaintiff, a forty-nine-year-old woman, seeks redress for sexual harassment and for age and sex discrimination in the workplace. She first brought an action before the Division of Civil Rights (DCR) against Wal-Mart Stores (Wal
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992-03-16 · Published · cited 7× · 417 S.E.2d 688; 203 Ga. App. 770; 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 620
203 Ga. App. 770 (1992) 417 S.E.2d 688 BRYANT v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al. A91A1712. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided March 16, 1992. Reconsideration Denied April 3, 1992. Oldfield & Wilson, James O. Wilson, Jr., Carmel W. Sanders, for appellant. McLain & Merritt, Howard M. Lessinger, for a
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-01-08 · Published · cited 9× · 89 F.4th 1217
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ARIANA MILES, No. 22-55522 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:18-CV-01559- v. JWH-SHK KIRKLAND’S STORES INC., OPINION Defendant-Appellee. Appeal fro
District Court, E.D. Washington · 2015-04-08 · Published · cited 1× · 305 F.R.D. 646; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50492; 2015 WL 1641519
CLASS CERTIFICATION ORDER STANLEY A BASTIAN, District Judge. This case is a good reminder that employers must take care to comply with all applicable employment laws and regulations. Here, the Court examines the interaction between the Agricultural Workers Protection Act (“AWPA”) and the H-2A temporary worker program. The AWPA regulates the recruitment and employment of domestic seasonal and migrant agric
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016-08-31 · Published · cited 182× · 835 F.3d 1125; 95 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1022; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 16106; 2016 WL 4537378
OPINION M. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Defendant Mercer Canyons, Inc. (Mercer) appeals the district court’s order certifying a class of domestic farm workers, represented by Bacilio Ruiz Torres and Jose Amador (collectively, Plaintiffs). Mercer operates a fruit and vegetable farm near Prosser, Washington. In 2013, Mercer participated in the federal H-2A progra
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011-01-13 · Published · cited 38× · 80 A.D.3d 958; 914 N.Y.S.2d 469
Mercure, J.P. (dissenting). I respectfully dissent. The majority adopts a rule that evidence of merchandise dropped frequently on the floor of a department store by customers — a common condition that cannot be prevented in advance — may establish constructive notice of a dangerous condition despite proof that the aisle in which the plaintiff fell was inspected shortly before the incident. In my view, such evidence is insufficien
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989-05-19 · Published · cited 82× · 870 F.2d 982
JERRE S. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: Appellants, father and son, challenge the district court’s denial of their motion for a new trial in their products’ liability suit involving defective jacks which collapsed while raising a trailer. The jury in this diversity case awarded medical damages below the stipulated amount, no damages in several categories for Michael Jones, the son,
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2007-02-28 · Published · cited 85× · 213 S.W.3d 469; 2006 WL 3518160
213 S.W.3d 469 (2006) RICHARDSON-EAGLE, INC., Appellant, v. WILLIAM M. MERCER, INC., and William M. Mercer of Texas, Inc., Appellees. No. 01-04-01000-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). December 7, 2006. Rehearing Overruled February 28, 2007. *471 James L. Reed, Jr., Travis Scott Crabtree, Looper,