Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT William J. Giacomo, J. Factual and Procedural Background Plaintiff commenced this residential mortgage foreclosure action on June 8, 2015. Although defendant did not file an answer she appeared at the July 31, 2015, August 17, 2015, December 1, 2015, February 26, 2016, and March 15, 2016 foreclosure settlement conferences. The case was released from the Settlement

*484 Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered July 3, 2014, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendant David Cespedes’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s claims based on a lack of a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed,

Vaccaro v Mercedes-Benz USA (2023 NY Slip Op 06603) Vaccaro v Mercedes-Benz USA 2023 NY Slip Op 06603 Decided on December 21, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 27, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-975 Lower Tribunal No. 22-238 ________________ Benzo Elias Rudnikas, Appellant,

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-1082 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. HECTOR ANTONIO CRUZ-MERCEDES, a/k/a Pedro Colon, a/k/a Hector Cruz, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Douglas P. Woodlock

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 19–1139 Filed May 29, 2020 STATE OF IOWA, Appellee, vs. MERCEDES JOJEAN DAMME, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Grundy County, Jeffrey L. Harris, Judge. Defendant appeals sentence imposed after conviction based on guilty plea, and State argues lack of good cause to appeal under Iowa Code section 814.6 (2019). AFFIRMED. Anne

417 F.Supp.2d 1350 (2006) MOVIMIENTO DEMOCRACIA, INC., Mercedes Hernandez Guerrero, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Michael CHERTOFF, Department of Homeland Security, et al., Defendants. No. 06-20044CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. Miami Division. February 28, 2006. *1351 Kendall B. Coffey, Coffey & Wright, LLP, Miami,

417 F.Supp.2d 1343 (2006) MOVIMIENTO DEMOCRACIA, INC., Mercedes Hernandez Guerrero, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Michael CHERTOFF, Department of Homeland Security, et al., Defendants. No. 06-20044CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. February 28, 2006. *1344 Kendall B. Coffey, Coffey & Wright, LLP, Miami,

J. JONES, Justice. Mercedes Turner filed suit against her former employer, the City of Lapwai (“the City”), claiming that she was owed unpaid compensation and reimbursement for certain expenses incurred during her employment. The City moved for summary judgment, arguing that Turner’s claim for unpaid compensation was barred by the applicable statute of limitations and that both

Blackwell, Justice. Edgar Betancourt and appellant Oscar Hernandez were tried by a jury and convicted of trafficking in cocaine. 1 At trial, the State presented evidence that Betancourt and Hernandez were stopped by law enforcement officers on Interstate 85 in Gwinnett County. In the course of that traffic stop, the off

TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA El presente recurso fue presentado el 14 de julio de 1996. No habiéndose realizado trámite ulterior alguno para perfeccionar el recurso, el 12 de septiembre de 1996 el Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico, representado por el Procurador General, radicó una Moción de Desestimación fundamentada en la violación de la parte demandante a la Regla 37 del Reglamento del Tribunal de Circuito de Apelaciones, 4 L.P.R

DISMISSED and Opinion Filed August 5, 2019. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01058-CV LINDA SPROWL, Appellant V. MERCEDES P. STILES, Appellee On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

*119Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered August 16, 2002, which denied plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on liability, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the motion only to the extent of finding defendants liable for those injuries sustained in the apartment occupied by plaintiffs aunt on the sixth floor of defendants’ building, and otherwise aff

99 F.3d 954 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8143, 96 Daily JournalD.A.R. 13,541Mercedes Lina LOPEZ-GALARZA; Raul Jose Hernandez-Lopez, Petitioners,v.IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70683. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 15, 1996.*Decided Nov. 8, 1996.<

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 19-2236 NYDIA MERCEDES HERNÁNDEZ-GOTAY; FAUSTINO ROSARIO-RODRÍGUEZ; LUIS JOEL BARRETO-BARRETO; CARLOS QUIÑONES-FIGUEROA; LAURA GREEN, Plaintiffs, Appellants, CLUB GALLÍSTICO DE PUERTO RICO, INC., Plaintiff, and ASOCIACIÓN CULTURAL Y DEPORTIVA DEL GALLO FINO DE PELEA; ÁNGEL MANUEL ORTIZ-DÍAZ; JOHN J. OLIVA

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered on or about December 11, 2000, which granted defendants’ motion to amend their answer to include seventh and eighth affirmative defenses and three counterclaims, unanimously modified, on the law, so as to deny leave to add the eighth affirmative defense and the three counterclaims, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Plaintiff is alleged to have sustained severe injuri

OPINION AND ORDER JUAN M. PÉREZ-GIMÉNEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In November of 2016, Sandy Hernandez-Mieses (“Hernandez” or “Defendant”), Yonattan Jimenez-Diaz (“Jimenez”), and Oniel Lajara-De La Cruz (“Lajara”) were charged with various firearm and drug-related counts. Co-defendant Hernandez now moves motion to suppress the evidence against him (Docket No. 63, 81), and the United States’ opposes hi

NUMBER 13-16-00696-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG SANDY PEREZ HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 139th District Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin, J.), dated February 24, 2012, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. On February 26, 2010, at approximately 12:45 p.m., the plaintiff was descending a staircase when she allegedly slipped and f

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin, J.), dated February 24, 2012, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. On February 26, 2010, at approximately 12:45 p.m., the plaintiff was descending a staircase when she allegedly slipped and f