⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “Meoli v. Blair”

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2007-07-19 · Published · cited 7× · 372 B.R. 846; 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 2336; 2007 WL 2262848
372 B.R. 846 (2007) In re R.W. LEET ELECTRIC, INC., Debtor. Marcia R. Meoli, Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kendall Electric, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. No. 06-8071. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit. Argued: May 1, 2007. Decided and Filed: July 19, 2007.[*] *847
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1989-05-03 · Published · cited 1× · 384 Pa. Super. 182; 557 A.2d 1106; 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1265
PER CURIAM: In this criminal action, the trial court used a motion to quash the information as a mechanism for entering a finding that the accused was not guilty and dismissing the prosecution. This was error. Therefore, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. A motion to quash is an appropriate means for raising defects apparent on the face of the information or other defects which would prevent p
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2007-08-09 · Published · cited 0×
ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2007 FED App. 0010P (6th Cir.) File Name: 07b0010p.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT In re R.W. LEET ELECTRIC, INC., Debtor. _________________________________________ MARCIA R. MEOLI, Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. No. 06-8071 KENDALL ELECTRIC, INC., Defendant - Appellee.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984-04-13 · Published · cited 67× · 733 F.2d 492; 15 Fed. R. Serv. 799; 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23570
FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge. Defendants George Reed, Paul Sheary, Johnathan Riebli, Thomas Schenk, and Peter Miller appeal their convictions for possessing marijuana with intent to distribute and conspiracy to distribute marijuana. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Their convictions stemmed from the DEA’s seizure, while exe