Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
6 opinions for “Menefee v. Tacoma Public School District No. 10”
State v. Hirschfelderpublic domain
Stephens, J. ¶1 This case requires us to interpret the statutory language prohibiting sexual relations between a student and a school employee, former RCW 9A.44-.093(l)(b) (2005). At issue is whether, under the statute, the term “minor” includes students between the ages of 18 and 21, or just those under 18. Also at issue is whether the statute is unconstitutionally vague or violates the defendant’s right to equal protection. We r
ATU LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL OF STATE v. Statepublic domain
40 P.3d 656 (2002) ATU LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL OF WASHINGTON STATE; and Washington State Transit Association, Respondents, v. STATE of Washington, Appellant, Benton County; Bobbi Gagner, auditor of Benton County; Franklin County; Zona Lenhart, auditor of Franklin County; Clallam County; Ken Foster, auditor of Clallam County; Snohomish County; Bob Terwilliger, auditor of Snohomish County; Clark County; Greg Kimsey, auditor of Clark County; Cowlitz
prod.liab.rep.(cch)p. 13,885 Sarah Ashby Sawtell v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporationpublic domain
BRORBY, Circuit Judge. Sarah Ashby Sawtell appeals from a summary judgment for the defendant E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (“DuPont”). Her complaint in this diversity action alleged claims in products liability. The corpus of her claims was that DuPont manufactured polymers inappropriately used in temporo-mandibular joint prostheses causing a foreign body reaction. The for
Romero v. City of Pomonapublic domain
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge: I. Background The plaintiffs, Gloria J. Romero, Willie E. White, Joseph Lee Duncan, Tomas Ursua and Harold Webb, eligible voters and residents of the City of Pomona, California, allege that that city’s at-large districting plan impermissibly dilutes the right of black and Hispanic voters to elect candidates of their choice to the Pomona City Council. These f
Romero v. City Of Pomonapublic domain
883 F.2d 1418 Dr. Gloria J. ROMERO, Willie E. White, Joseph Lee Duncan,Tomas Ursua, and Harold Webb,Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees,v.The CITY OF POMONA; G. Stanton Selby, Mayor of the City ofPomona; Vernon M. Weigand, Councilman District 1; E.J.Gualding, Councilman District 2; Donna Smith, CouncilpersonDistrict 3; Mark Nymeyer, Councilman District 4; In TheirOfficial Capacities, Defendants-Appellees/Cros
205 F.2d 560 TAKEHARAv.DULLES, Secretary of State of the United States. No. 13555. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. June 11, 1953. Toru Sakahara, Gerald Shucklin and Hile, Hoof & Shucklin, Seattle, Wash., for appellant. J. Charles Dennis, U. S. Atty., Seattle, Wash., Gu