Cases

StATE OF. VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION Washington Unit . 2818 oc] | 2 i A ifs 38 Docket No. 406-7-17 Wucv MATTHEW MORGAN Plaintiff — Wt v. 2 LISA MENARD, Commissioner, Vermont Department of Corrections Defendant DECISION The State’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Matthew Morgan, an inmate in the custody of the Commissioner of the Department of Corrections, filed this action seeking damages and other relief against the Vermont Department of Corrections and several agents of the DOC. The

Morgan v. Menard, 406-7-17 Wncv (Teachout, J., Oct. 12, 2018). [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.] STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION Washington Unit

Lipscomb, J. It seems to me very clear that such certificates were not subject to be levied on and sold at common law; that, like any other evidence of debt or an interest secured, they were not supposed to possess any intrinsic value, and could not have been the subject of larceny. It has been so considered'in most of the States where the common law forms the basis of their jurisprudence, and hence statutes have been enacted in

812 F.Supp. 1498 (1992) ACME PRINTING INK COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. MENARD, INC., a Wisconsin corporation; Ed's Masonry and Trucking, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation; Edward J. Fadrowski; Anthony Ivancich; Bel-Aire Enterprises, Concrete Contractors, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation; Brey's Saw Shop, a partnership; Dan Brey; Max Brey; Cambridge Chemical, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation; Cardinal Fabricating Corp., a Wisconsin corpora

SULLIVAN, Judge. |;In this workers’ compensation matter, Shaw Construction (Shaw) appeals a judgment rendered by the workers’ compensation judge (WJC) in favor of Marvin Ar-naud, its former employee, awarding him Supplemental Earning Benefits (SEBs), reimbursing him for all of his out-of-pocket medical expenses, and authorizing treatment by his choice of orthopedist. Mr. Arnaud answers the appeal, asserting that the WCJ erred

Docket No. 80378–Agenda 1–May 1998. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellee, v. GREGORY SHAW, Appellant. Opinion filed October 22, 1998. JUSTICE McMORROW delivered the opinion of the court: On October 5, 1994, defendant was charged in a six count indictment with armed robbery (720 ILCS 5/18–2(a) (West 1996)), felony murder (720 ILCS 5/9–1(a)(3

Robert H. Dudley, Justice. We affirm the judgment of conviction for driving while under the influence of intoxicants. The primary issue is whether A.R.E. Rule 615, the witness sequestration rule, is waived when counsel fails to ask for “the rule” before the testimony begins. The State’s first witness in its case-in-chief had answered a few preliminary question

615 So.2d 466 (1993) William Ernest SHAW, et al. v. Emmett J. BOURN, Jr. No. 92-CA-0552. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. February 26, 1993. Writ Denied April 30, 1993. Kathleen E. Simon, Simon and Rees, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant Emmett J. Bourn, Jr. Jerry L. Saporito, Patricia S. LeBlanc, Karen Wells Roby, Bernard, Ca

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 15-1746 Filed July 27, 2016 BRIAN LIPHARDT AND TRACY LIPHARDT, Plaintiff-Appellants, vs. SCOTT RYAN SHAW, Individually, and INFINITY CONSTRUCTION, a sole proprietorship, Defendant-Appellees. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Clinton County, Mark J. Smith, Judge. Homeowners

355 So.2d 1350 (1978) Kenneth R. RIDDLE et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert MENARD et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 6294. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. February 6, 1978. Rehearings Denied March 29, 1978. *1351 C. Kenneth Deshotel, Opelousas, for plaintiffs-appellants. Davidson, Meaux,

WIDENER, Circuit Judge: On July 26, 1988, the bankruptcy court and the district court jointly confirmed the “Sixth Amended and Restated Plan of Reorganization” (the Plan) submitted by A.H. Robins Company, Inc. (Robins). In Re A.H. Robins Co. Inc., 88 B.R. 742 (E.D.Va. 1988). Rosemary Menard-Sanford and certain other personal injury claimants, who voted against the Plan, appeal. -They challenge the district court’s a

Mr. JUSTICE THOMAS J. MORAN delivered the opinion of the court: Defendant appeals from an order which denied his petition for relief under the Post-Conviction Hearing Act. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 38, sec. 122 — 1 etseq.) The offense of voluntary manslaughter was committed on June 12, 1967. Defendant was 20 years of age when, on September 29,

[Cite as State v. Kindle, 2022-Ohio-2991.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ALLEN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 1-22-02 v. JEREMY A. KINDLE, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Allen County Common Pleas Court Tr

CHARLES A. SHAW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Scott Gustafson's ("plaintiff") motion to remand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Defendant Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan District ("defendant") opposes the motion to remand and it is fully

[Cite as State v. Finfrock, 2018-Ohio-5057.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ALLEN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 1-18-42 v. JOSEPH W. FINFROCK, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 1-18-43 v. JOSEPH W. FINFROCK,

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1318 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GUSTAVO COLON, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

OPINION COLIN STIRLING BRUCE, U.S. District Judge. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se from his incarceration in Menard Correctional Center, claims that Defendants retaliated against him for pursuing a lawsuit challenging the alleged excessive soy in the prison diet and for helping other inmates *1094file prison grievances seeking a soy-free diet.

761 F.Supp.2d 776 (2010) UNITED STATES ex rel. William HOLLAND, Petitioner, v. Dave REDNOUR,[1] Warden, Menard Correctional Center, Respondent. No. 10 C 4169. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 29, 2010. *781 William Holland, Menard, IL, pro se. Retha Stotts, Illinois Attorne

[Cite as State v. Snyder, 2025-Ohio-2156.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ROSS COUNTY State of Ohio, : Case No. 24CA14 Plaintiff-Appellee, : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY v. : Gordon

754 F.Supp.2d 992 (2010) UNITED STATES ex. rel. Lawrence McKINLEY, Petitioner, v. Dave REDNOUR,[1] Warden, Menard Correctional Center, Respondent. No. 10 C 0787. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 9, 2010. *994 Lawrence McKinley, Menard, IL, pro se. Stephen Matthew Soltanzade