Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEPHANIE G., 1 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 22-cv-00904-RMM MARTIN O’MALLEY, 2 Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Stephanie G. brought this action under a provision of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of t

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEWAYNE WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-02072 (CJN) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Dewayne Wright, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, challenges the S

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1394 Doc: 28 Filed: 07/18/2025 Pg: 1 of 22 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1394 DAWN M. DRUMGOLD, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant –

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) KISHA SIMON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 17-2033 (RBW) ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY,

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2042 Doc: 42 Filed: 02/22/2023 Pg: 1 of 48 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-2042 SHELLEY C., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KEVIN TONEY, Plaintiff, v. No. 1:21-cv-00557-ZMF KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Kevin Toney moves to reverse a decision by Defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commi

23-831 Nunez v. Commissioner of Social Security In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ___________________________________________ August Term, 2023 Argued: March 19, 2024 Decided: November 25, 2025 Amended: December 29, 20

PER CURIAM: Appellant Hans Schink applied for Social Security disability benefits based on various physical impairments and the fact that he suffered from bipolar disorder. The matter proceeded to a hearing before an administrative law judge ("ALJ"), who denied benefits. Schink appealed the decision

OPINION AND ORDER HON. R. STEVEN WHALEN, U.S. Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Daniel Richard Shipman brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging a final decision of Defendant Commissioner denying his application for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under the Social Security Act. Both parties have filed summary judgment motions. For the reasons set for

23-831 Nunez v. Commissioner of Social Security In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit ___________________________________________ August Term, 2023 Argued: March 19, 2024 Decided: November 25, 2025 Docket No. 23-831-cv

OPINION BÜMB, United States District Judge:,, This matter comes before the Court on an appeal from„a final administrative-decision by the Commissioner of Social Security which denied benefits to Plaintiff Charles Schemelia (“Plaintiff’). (Adminis*535trative Record (“AR”) 25-26). On June 5, 2017, this Court conducted oral argument. For the reasons s

PER CURIAM: Claimant Betty Mijenes appeals the district court’s order affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of her application for supplemental security income. On appeal, Mijenes argues that the ALJ’s residual functional capacity assessment is not supported by substantial evidence. She also challenges the ALJ’s determination that she could perform her past relevant work, as well as the weight the ALJ assig

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TERRENCE G. BERG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case is an appeal of the denial of Plaintiffs application' for social' security disability insurance benefits. This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti’s Report and Recommendation dated December 29, 2016 (Dkt. 21), recommending that Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment be granted, that

MEMORANDUM OPINION ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge Plaintiff Geraldine Campfield applied to the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) for disability benefits and supplemental security income benefits in 2012, claiming that she was disabled due to

SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-Appellant Maritza Lopez (“Lopez”) appeals from the August 5, 2014 order and the September 29, 2014 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Carter, J.) affirming the April 2, 2012 final administrative decision denying her application for disability benefits. Lopez challenges this disability determination on the grounds that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) (

OPINION AND ORDER JAMES L. COTT, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Constance Craig brings this action seeking judicial review of a final determination by Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying Craig’s application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and social security income (“SSI”). Craig moved, and the Commissioner cross-moved, for jud

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Francisco Garcia brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and 1383(c) to obtain judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his claim for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. On March 1, 2016, the Commissioner m

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff Michele Laverne Brooks brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her claim for Social Security Disability benefits under the Social Security Act. The Commissioner has moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant

OPINION AND ORDER Susan Collins, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Danny Holland appeals to the district court from a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his application under the Social Security Act (the “Act”) for disability insurance benefits and disabled widower’s benefits (together, “DIB”).1 (DE

MEMORANDUM OPINION Jane M. Virden, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This cause is before the Court on Plaintiffs complaint for judicial review of an unfavorable final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying claims for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. The parties have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the pro