Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Melvin Roy Jones”
907 F.2d 1447 59 USLW 2050 Karen PINCHBACK, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.ARMISTEAD HOMES CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant,andMelvin Maeser; Roy E. Jones Real Estate, Inc.; Roy E.Jones; Diane Dailey; J.R. Diamond, Inc., Defendants,v.ROY E. JONES REAL ESTATE, INC., Third Party Defendant,andUnited States of America, Amicus Curiae. No. 89-2117.
State v. Melvinpublic domain
707 S.E.2d 629 (2010) STATE of North Carolina v. Jihad Rashid MELVIN. No. 382PA09. Supreme Court of North Carolina. December 20, 2010. *630 Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Norma S. Harrell, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State-appellant. Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Daniel R. Pollitt, Assistant Appe
Melvin DeWitt v. Earl G. Ferriespublic domain
2018 WI 117 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2016AP1765 COMPLETE TITLE: Petition for Order Regarding Williams/Jones Pioneer Cemetery: Melvin DeWitt, Donna DeWitt, Darrell Parker, Ruth Parker, Merlin Williams, Wanda Williams and Phyllis McCoy, Petitioners-Respon
State v. Jonespublic domain
19 Wn. App. 850 (1978) 578 P.2d 71 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. MELVIN EARL JONES, Appellant. No. 5253-1. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One. April 24, 1978. *851 Steinberg & Steinberg and Jack Steinberg, for appellant. Christopher T. Bayley, Prosecuting
*409 OPINION HOLLIS HORTON, Justice In this interlocutory appeal, the Lone Star Groundwater Conservation District 1 and its Directors seek appellate review of orders overruling their pleas to the jurisdiction. In their ple
Sidharth Solanki v. Melvin Tyrone Ervinpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2008-CA-01083-SCT SIDHARTH SOLANKI, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARY; DEVESHA S. SOLANKI AND AVANI S. SOLANKI, MINORS BY AND THROUGH THEIR FATHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, SIDHARTH SOLANKI, AND NEHA SOLANKI, WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF NILIMA SOLANKI, DECEASED, AND ALL OTHER WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF NILIMA SOLANKI, DECEASED v. MELVIN TYRONE ERVIN AND THE MERCHANTS COMPANY DATE
Chancellor v. Melvinpublic domain
This is a controversy between materialmen and laborers, and the owner of a building constructed for him by a contractor. The former parties assert statutory liens on money owed the contractor by the owner. The principal problem is to determine the amount of the owner's unpaid balance on the construction contract. Several weeks prior to October 1, 1948, appellee, cross-appellant and defendant below, Leonard B. Melvin, and M.C. Parker, a contractor, also a defendant below, had be
DeWitt v. Ferriespublic domain
ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. *4¶ 1 The Petitioners, collectively the DeWitts, seek to transfer a one-acre parcel of property to the Town of Forest.1 They assert that the parcel is a cemetery where they believe their relatives are buried and that the parcel is neglected or abandoned. The circuit court agreed and issued an order
Virgie Lee Otey v. Melvin Marshallpublic domain
*1151 MAGILL, Circuit Judge. Larry Smith was the police chief of Elaine, Arkansas, when Charles Otey was killed by an Elaine police officer. The administrator of Otey’s estate brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) suit against Chief Smith, alleging that Chief Smith had failed to supervise and train the
United States v. Marcus De'angelo Jonespublic domain
TUNHEIM, District Judge. Appellant Marcus DeAngelo Jones challenges his convictions for felony possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and § 924(e) as well as for making false statements to acquire a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6) and § 924(a)(1)(B). Jones challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, a number of evidentiary rulings, and the di
United States v. Marcus D. Jonespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 00-3706 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellant, * * Appeals from the United States v. * District Cour
Jones v. Statepublic domain
Appeal from Circuit Court, Sunflower County; B.B. Wilkes, Judge. Before PATTERSON, C.J., and PRATHER and ROBERTSON, JJ. AFFIRMED. WALKER and ROY NOBLE LEE, P.JJ., and HAWKINS, DAN M. LEE, SULLIVAN and ANDERSON, JJ., concur.
People v. Jonespublic domain
JUSTICE PINCHAM delivered the opinion of the court: Following a bench trial, defendant, Melvin Jones, was found guilty of the murder of Geoffrey Mayfield, which occurred in Chicago in January 1982. Defendant was adjudged an habitual criminal and was sentenced to imprisonment for natural life. Defendant conte
971 F.2d 591 59 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 833,59 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,643, 61 USLW 2175,1 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 41 Robert L. GRAY; Paul W. Babcock; Robert N. Cardwell;Kenneth P. Davis; Melvin P. DeWeese; Gene E. Eastham;Fred M. Graham, Jr.; Stanley M. Hachinsky; Marvin R.Harbour; Roy E. Hauk; Robert P. Jones; Chester M.Martinson; Patrick C. McNellis; Elmer A. Nilges; W.E.P
ENGEL, Circuit Judge. In England v. Louisiana Board of Medical Examiners, 375 U.S. 411, 84 S.Ct. 461, 11 L.Ed.2d 440 (1964), the Supreme Court provided a means whereby a federal court plaintiff could preserve his right to litigate federal issues in federal court even though he had been required by Pullman abstention first to present his st
State v. Huntpublic domain
664 S.E.2d 662 (2008) STATE of North Carolina v. Christopher Melvin HUNT. No. COA08-14. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 19, 2008. Attorney General Roy A. Cooper, III, by Assistant Attorney General Robert M. Curran, for the State. Haral E. Carlin, Fayetteville, for defendant-appellant. HUNTER, Judge. Christopher Melvin Hunt ("defendant
Jones v. Board of Ethics for Elected Off.public domain
605 So.2d 1064 (1992) Theodore "Ted" L. JONES v. BOARD OF ETHICS FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS, et al. No. 92-CA-0795. Supreme Court of Louisiana. October 19, 1992. *1065 Thomas F. Wade, Roy A. Mongrue, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellants. John M. Tarver, Paul D. McKay, Jones & Tarver, H. Alston Johnson, III, Phelps Dunbar, R. G
Saint Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Roy A. Dart Insurance Agency (In Re Roy A. Dart Insurance Agency)public domain
5 B.R. 207 (1980) In re ROY A. DART INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., Debtor. SAINT PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff, v. ROY A. DART INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., American Protection, Lumbermans Mutual Casualty, American Motorists, American Manufacturers Mutual, Federal Kemper Insurance Co., and Agency Assistance Corp., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 80-433-HL, Adv. No. 80-0311. United States Bankruptcy
RAYMOND R. ABRAMSON, Judge | ] This case stems from a lengthy and contentious dispute between appellant, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (“NAACP”), and the Crittenden County Branch of the NAACP (“the Branch”), represented by appellee, Hubert Bass. In 2010, Mr. Bass filed suit in the Crittenden County Circuit Court to resolve a
Biddy v. Jonespublic domain
Mrs. Florence E. Garvin executed her Will on the 14th day of April, 1967. In paragraph 2 of the Will, it is stated: "It is my will and desire that all of the estate of every description, real, personal or mixed, which I may own or die seized of shall pass to my beloved children, share and share alike in equal protions, to-wit: "Leonard M. Jones of Elpaso, Texas, "Agnes A. Jones of Everman, Texas, "Mrs. Hazel Morgan wife of Frank Morgan of Ba