Cases

ATKINS, District Judge: This case is before the Court pursuant to the petition to review an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals that denied suspension of deportation after the special inquiry officer ordered the petitioner deported. We affirm. On June 26, 1967, the petitioner was convicted in the Un

[Cite as Duff v. Centrome, Inc., 2023-Ohio-1321.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY PAMELA DUFF MUNDY, et al. : Appellees, : CASE NO. CA2022-03-014 : OPINION - vs -

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 208PA22 Filed 15 December 2023 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MELVIN RAY WOOLARD, JR. On writ of certiorari pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-32(b) to review order granting defendant’s motion to suppress entered on 29 March 2022 by Judge Darrell B. Cayton Jr. in District Court, Beaufort County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 13 September 2023.

Case: 19-1277 Document: 49 Page: 1 Filed: 03/25/2020 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ANAHEIM GARDENS, L.P., THETFORD PROPERTIES III, L.P., THETFORD PROPERTIES IV, L.P., B-L ASSOCIATES, L.P., C-W ASSOCIATES, L.P., GLENVIEW GARDENS L.P., INDIAN HEAD MANOR, L.P. I, METRO WEST LIMITED, L.P., MILLWOOD ASSOCIATES L.P., NAPA PARK APARTMENTS L.P., ONTARIO TOWNHOUSES, L.P., PALOMAR APARTMENTS,

Melvin Mayfield, Judge, dissenting. I cannot agree with the result reached by the majority opinion in this case. The case comes to us from a conditional plea of guilty to the possession of approximately 60 kilograms (130 pounds) of cocaine with intent to deliver, which the appellant admits was found in “closed luggage” in the trunk of a vehicle he was driving. He was sentenced to twenty years for the Class Y fe

Volume 1 of 2 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 02-50084 v.  D.C. No. LEONAR NELLINO SEGURA PERLAZA, CR-00-03209-TJW Defendant-Appellant.  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plai

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;

100 B.R. 767 (1989) In re SHARON STEEL CORPORATION, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 87-207E. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. June 7, 1989. *768 *769 *770 M. Bruce McCullough, and Thomas VanKirk, of Buchanan Ingersoll, P.C., Pittsburgh, Pa., and Jeffrey Sa

728 F.2d 68 Salvador CABAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1456, Docket 83-6077. United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit. Argued June 13, 1983.Decided Feb. 7, 1984. Melvin L. Wulf, New York City (Beldock Levine & Hoffman, Leon Rosen, New York City, on brie

OPINION JACOBSON, Judge. This appeal involves the validity of a release. The trial court sustained the release against an attack on the basis of fraud and granted summary judgment against the plaintiff-appellant on her claim for personal injuries. Most of the mainstream facts are uncon-troverted. In the summer of 1976, J. D. Haygood, a truck driver employed by appel-lee, Home Transport

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH DEC 13 2004 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS PATRICK FISHER Clerk

Opinion WHELAN, Acting P. J. Defendant Melvin Clark has appealed from a judgment committing him to prison for burglary of which he had been found guilty by a jury which found him guilty also of forcible rape, the crime for which the burglarious entry was made. Execution of the sentence on the rape charge was suspended. The crimes of which defendant was found guilty were committed on September

Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM

Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM

I agree with the majority's unpublished memorandum as to all issues except Issue IV. As to Issue IV, I dissent, based on Judge Shaw's special writing in Poole v. State, [Ms. CR-99-1200, Aug. 31, 2001] ___ So.2d ___ (Ala.Crim.App. 2001). As to those points of law on which I disagree with Judge Shaw, see my special writing in Poole, supra. *Page 167 DECISIONS OF THE ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPIN

370 P.2d 442 (1962) M. B. THOMPSON, Plaintiff in Error, v. William R. McCORMICK, Defendant in Error. No. 19468. Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc. March 12, 1962. Rehearing Denied April 23, 1962. *443 Albin Anderson, Jr., Grand Junction, for plaintiff in error. Milenski & Parga, Cortez, Fred M. Winner

OPINION WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which GARY R. WADE, C.J., JANICE M. HOLDER, CORNELIA A. CLARK, and SHARON G. LEE, JJ., joined. This appeal involves questions regarding when the police may legally arrest a suspect based on information provided by an accomplice and th

Dear Constable Maddox: Your opinion request, listing three questions regarding the outcome of hypothetical litigation brought against you as a Constable for the performance of your legal duties, has been forwarded to me for response. As the outcome of any litigation is fact-specific and dependent upon current law, we cannot definitively predict the outcome of such an action. However, we will provide a synopsis of the statutory and jurisprudential protections conferred upon public offi

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Dear Mr. Scott: Your opinion request regarding highway solicitations and the Town of Pollock's liability therefore has been forwarded to me for response. While it is illegal to solicit on an interstate highway (see LSA 14:97.1, attached), Louisiana law does permit certain groups, including professional firefighters associations and non-profit organizations, to solicit contributions from a public roadway subject to the permission ofthe municipality. (See LSA-R.S.