⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Melton v. Cook Incorporated”

People v. Meltonpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2025-03-28 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 IL App (1st) 231935
2025 IL App (1st) 231935 No. 1-23-1935 Order filed March 28, 2025 FIFTH DIVISION NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1).
Melton v. Guypublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016-01-20 · Published · cited 1× · 2016 Ohio 194
[Cite as Melton v. Guy, 2016-Ohio-194.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TIMOTHY A. MELTON : JUDGES: : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff - Appellant : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J. : Hon. Craig R
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2023-03-22 · Published · cited 5× · 467 Ill. Dec. 136; 218 N.E.3d 471; 2023 IL App (4th) 220281
2023 IL App (4th) 220281 FILED March 22, 2023 NO. 4-22-0281 Carla Bender th
People v. Meltonpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014-03-05 · Published · cited 7× · 2013 IL App (1st) 60039
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court People v. Melton, 2013 IL App (1st) 060039 Appellate Court THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Caption TERRANCE MELTON, Defendant-Appellant. District & No. First District, Fifth Division Docket No. 1-06-0039 Rule 23 Order filed November 21, 2012 Rule
Melton v. Astruepublic domain
District Court, D. Oregon · 2012-09-07 · Published · cited 0× · 895 F. Supp. 2d 1054; 2012 WL 3922334; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127814
OPINION AND ORDER MICHAEL W. MOSMAN, District Judge. Plaintiff Carol Melton (“Melton”), seeks judicial review of the Social Security Commissioner’s final decision denying her applications for Supplemental Security Income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. I have jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and review to determine that the Commissioner’s decision was based upon substantial evidence.
Melton v. Meltonpublic domain
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003-08-20 · Published · cited 37× · 831 A.2d 646
831 A.2d 646 (2003) Scott MELTON, Appellant, v. Jean K. MELTON, Appellee, v. Jodene L. Berry, Appellee. Scott Melton, Appellee, v. Jean K. Melton, Appellant, v. Jodene L. Berry, Appellant. Scott Melton, Appellee, v. Jean K. Melton, Appellant, v. Jodene L. Berry, Appellee. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued June 17, 2003. Filed
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020-09-14 · Published · cited 0×
FILED Sep 14 2020, 9:01 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013-11-26 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 11, 2013 Session BRANDON W. MARTIN AND AMY MARTIN v. W. B. MELTON AND PEGGY MELTON Appeal from the Circuit Court for Overton County No. 4326H John D. Wootten, Jr., Judge No. M2012-01500-COA-R3-CV - Filed November 26, 2013 An apprentice lineman agreed to help a neighbor by climbi
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999-02-04 · Published · cited 11× · 238 B.R. 686; 1999 WL 701197
238 B.R. 686 (1999) In re John L. MELTON, Debtor. Debra A. Melton, Plaintiff, v. John L. Melton, Defendant. Bankruptcy Nos. 97-3322, 97-32496. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio. February 4, 1999. *687 *688 *689 Gordon R. Barry, Toledo, OH, for d
Cook v. Bentleypublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2016-03-04 · Published · cited 2× · 202 So. 3d 316
BRYAN, Justice.1 Facts and Procedural Background Curtis J. Cook, Jr., and Joe Daniel Holt, Jr. (hereinafter sometimes referred to collectively as “the petitioners”), are inmates incarcerated by the Alabama Department of Corrections (“the DOC”). The petitioners each filed in the Elmore Circuit Court (“the trial court”) a “petition for release order” seeking their rel
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004-02-24 · Published · cited 0×
SECOND DIVISION February 24, 2004 No. 1-03-1447 ELLA MELTON, ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court of Plaintiff-Appellee ) Cook County. ) v. ) ) FRIGIDAIRE and BEST BUY,
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011-10-11 · Published · cited 4× · 72 So. 3d 540; 2011 Miss. App. LEXIS 624; 2011 WL 5027256
72 So.3d 540 (2011) ASPIRED CUSTOM HOMES, LLC, Appellant v. Todd MELTON and Tina Melton, Appellees. No. 2010-CA-00429-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. October 11, 2011. *542 Thomas Melvin McElroy, Tupelo, attorney for appellant. Michael Blakely Gratz Jr., attorney for appellees. Before IRVING, P.J., ISHEE and C
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982-09-22 · Published · cited 11× · 689 F.2d 281
LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge. The Developmental Disabilities Advocacy Center1 (“DDAC”) and “next friend” Freda Smith (suing on behalf of three residents2 of New Hampshire’s Laconia State School and Training Center (“LSS”)) appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their suit brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In the suit plaintiffs sought injunctive and dec
Exum v. Meltonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000-06-30 · Published · cited 0× · 244 Ga. App. 775; 536 S.E.2d 786
Miller, Judge. In June 1994, Albert L. Exum, individually and as administrator of the estate of his late wife, commenced this medical negligence action against Dawn Aeree, M.D., Howard L. Melton, M.D., Melton’s professional corporation, and South Georgia Medical Center in the State Court of Lowndes County. Within two weeks, service of process on Melton was attempted at his office by delivering the summons and complaint into th
Cook v. Smithpublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2010-11-22 · Published · cited 7× · 705 S.E.2d 847; 288 Ga. 409; 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 4057; 2010 Ga. LEXIS 887
705 S.E.2d 847 (2010) COOK v. SMITH et al. No. S10A0831. Supreme Court of Georgia. November 22, 2010. Reconsideration Denied December 16, 2010. *848 Maurice L. King, Jr., Albany, for appellant. Franklin T. Coleman, III, Perry & Walters, LLP, Albany, for appellees. MELTON, Justice. In Janu
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2022-11-16 · Published · cited 0×
Judgment rendered November 16, 2022. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 54,788-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** SPRINGBOK ROYALTY
District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1981-09-02 · Published · cited 6× · 521 F. Supp. 365; 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14270
521 F.Supp. 365 (1981) DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ADVOCACY CENTER, INC., Harold Tuttle, Alice Graham, Lillian Cooke, Bruce Spinney, by and through their next friend, Freda Smith, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Jack MELTON, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Laconia State School and Training Center, Gary Miller, in his official capacity as Director of the Division of Mental Health and Developmental Services.
Exum v. Meltonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000-06-30 · Published · cited 12× · 536 S.E.2d 786; 244 Ga. App. 775; 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 3047; 2000 Ga. App. LEXIS 855
536 S.E.2d 786 (2000) 244 Ga. App. 775 EXUM et al. v. MELTON et al. No. A00A0846. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 30, 2000. Certiorari Denied November 30, 2000. *787 Bird, Ballard & Still, William Q. Bird, Atlanta, J. Converse Bright, Valdosta, for appellants. Watson, Spence,
Melton v. Ezellpublic domain
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967-09-07 · Published · cited 2× · 156 S.E.2d 871; 250 S.C. 183; 1967 S.C. LEXIS 178
250 S.C. 183 (1967) 156 S.E.2d 871 C. D. MELTON, Jr., J. Dan Gosnell, E.W. Ligon, N.A. Ridgeway, Sr., Henry Cohen, Harold W. Minton, Harry Simon, J. Hugh Jackson, Mabry Vannerson and M.L. Whaley, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Appellants, v. W.C. EZELL, C.C. Johnson, Ned P. Hobbs, Luther B. Elmgren and Henry V. Sawyer, constituting The South Carolina Board of Examiners in Optometry, Respondents.
Fyke v. Meltonpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996-04-26 · Published · cited 0× · 279 Ill. App. 3d 415; 664 N.E.2d 1070; 216 Ill. Dec. 142; 1996 Ill. App. LEXIS 297
PRESIDING JUSTICE COOK delivered the opinion of the court: The Mobile Home Landlord and Tenant Rights Act (Act) (765 ILCS 745/1 et seq. (West 1992)) imposes severe restrictions upon landlords who rent mobile home lots. The landlords in this case did not comply with those restrictions, and we accordingly reverse. Landlords Jerry and Gabriele Fyk