Cases

Leach, J. ¶1 Per and Melody Westerdal appeal the trial court’s order terminating this receivership proceeding. They contend that the trial court should have first either disallowed or adjudicated their claim to 25 percent of a *173 valuable receivership asset. Because the receivership had fulfilled its

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH January 9, 2017 Elisabeth A. Shumaker UNITED STAT

ORDER The court has received appellants’ emergency motion (Docket Entry No. 14). Appellants’ request for an immediate administrative stay pending full consideration of the emergency motion for a stay pending appeal is denied. Appellees’ opposition to the emergency motion is due Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 11:59 p.m. PST. Appellants’ reply in support of the emergency motion is due Monday, February 6, 2017 at 3:00 p.m.

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this court determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. Accordingly, this court previously entered an order honoring the parties’ requests that the appeal be submitted without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). I. INTRODUCTION

869 F.Supp. 1180 (1994) COTTMAN TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS, INC. v. Donna MELODY and Lee W. Melody. Civ. A. No. 94-CV-2038. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. October 26, 1994. Order Denying Reconsideration December 7, 1994. *1181 *1182 Todd P. Leff, Renee Harris Sacke

ORDER PER CURIAM: At issue in this emergency proceeding is Executive Order 13769, “Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States,” which, among other changes to immigration policies and procedures, bans for 90 days the entry into the United States of individuals from seven countries. Two States challenged the Executive Order a

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 21, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-20-00123-CV MARCUS JACQUOT, Appellant V. MELODY COKER, Appellee On Appeal from the 280th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca

MEMORANDUM JOYNER, District Judge. Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on Counts IIV of Defendants’ counterclaims pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Facts Plaintiff, a Pennsylvania corporation, sold Defendants Melody a franchise located in California. Plaintiff filed this suit agai

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOYNER, District Judge. This civil action is again before the Court upon motion of the plaintiff, Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc. to hold the defendants in civil contempt of the temporary restraining order issued by the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Pennsylvania prior to removal of this action. That restraining order was left in full force and effect until

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 16‐4234 DELORES HENRY, et al., Plaintiffs‐Appellants, v. MELODY HULETT, et al., Defendants‐Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 16‐4234 DELORES HENRY, et al., Plaintiffs‐Appellants, v. MELODY HULETT, et al., Defendants‐Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 16‐4234 DELORES HENRY, et al., Plaintiffs‐Appellants, v. MELODY HULETT, et al., Defendants‐Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court

462 F.3d 609 Timothy BROWN, individually and as next friend of Melody Brown, his minor daughter, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 04-5171. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: March 17, 2005. Decided and Filed: September 8, 2006. ARGU

NUMBER 13-13-00456-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG MELODY LABRY, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 347th District Court of

LARRY D. VAUGHT, Chief Judge. 11 This case involves a zoning decision made by the Washington County Quorum Court granting appellee Big Red Dirt Farm, LLC, a conditional-use permit to operate a rock quarry on land bordering appellants Marian and David Bolen’s property. The Bolens argue that the Washington County Circuit Court erred in its refusal to grant them a de novo, jury-trial review of the quorum court

OPINION KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge. When an employee accuses a fellow employee of sexual harassment, the employer must reconcile competing rights: the accuser’s right to a harassment-free work *1189 place and the accused’s right not to be disciplined without fair procedures

USCA4 Appeal: 24-2131 Doc: 89 Filed: 12/30/2025 Pg: 1 of 40 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-2131 MELODY COOPER, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Kwamena Ocran, Plaintiff – Appellee, v.

Siddoway, C.J. ¶1 Melody Wright appeals her conviction of 1 count of first degree theft and 10 counts of Medicaid fraud arising from her submission of false telephonic time invoices for in-home care provided to her mother. She challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, asserts an equal protection violation, and contends that the trial court abused its discretion in finding that her convictions of first degree theft and Medicaid

ORDER PER CURIAM On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction, this court’s December 5, 2017, order directing respondent to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that resp

Grosse, J. — In this action brought under the Growth Management Act, chapter 36.70A RCW (GMA), we must decide three issues which we resolve as follows: First, the GMA provides that a comprehensive plan and development regulations are presumptively valid upon adoption. This presumption applies even though Whatcom County had previously gotten a declaration from the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board declaring cert