Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Meller v. Bank of the West”
Meller & Snyder v. R & T PROPERTIES, INC.public domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1305 OPINION I. INTRODUCTION R T Properties, Inc. (defendant), appeals from a judgment against it and in favor of Meller Snyder (plaintiff), a law firm, in a joint debtor proceeding pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 989 et seq. The t
Supreme Court No. 2022-74-Appeal. (PC 20-7250) (Concurrence and Dissent begin on Page 42) Kevin Bennett et al. : v. : Angela Steliga, individually and : personally and as Trustee of The Angela
Supreme Court No. 2022-74-Appeal. (PC 20-7250) (Concurrence and Dissent begin on Page 42) Kevin Bennett et al. : v. : Angela Steliga, individually and : personally and as Trustee of The Angela
Leasing Service Corporation, (86-5345), (86-5510) v. First Tennessee Bank National Association, (86-5345), (86-5510)public domain
KEITH, Circuit Judge. Appellant-cross appellee First Tennessee Bank National Association (“Bank”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee-cross appellant Leasing Services Corporation (“LSC”). In its ruling, the court held that LSC was the holder of a security interest, senior to the Bank’s own security interest, in the collateral of Metier C
839 F.2d 434 Dewey E. COLEMAN, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Henry RISLEY, Warden, Montana State Prison, and Michael T.Greely, Attorney General for the State of Montana,Respondents-Appellees. No. 85-4242. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 7, 1986.Decided Jan. 19, 1988.
First National Bank of Tuscaloosa v. Kennedypublic domain
COLEMAN, J., dissenting. — There are two proposi- tions of law involved in this case, which were considered at great length and determined when the case was here on a former appeal, reported in 107 Ala. 170, dissenting opinion Ib. 200. No new questions are raised on this appeal. My associates, Justices McClellan and Haral-SON, adhere to their former opinion without further argument or citation of authorit
Stephanie Ingram v. Alberto Barraganpublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-17-00311-CV Stephanie INGRAM, Appellant v. Alberto BARRAGAN, Appellee
Skanska USA Bldg. Inc. v Atlantic Yards B2 Owner, LLC (2016 NY Slip Op 06903) Skanska USA Bldg. Inc. v Atlantic Yards B2 Owner, LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 06903 Decided on October 20, 2016 Appellate Division, First Department Ac
Adbul-Mumit v. Alexandria Hyundai, LLCpublic domain
THACKER, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from the dismissal of three consumer actions based on Virginia state law claims. The actions focus on a series of misrepresentations made by Hyundai Motor America ("Hyundai") regarding the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") estimated fuel economy for the 2011, 2012, and 2013 models of the Hyundai Elantra. A Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") consolidated dozens of si
Cleveland v. Johnsonpublic domain
Opinion RUBIN, Acting P. J. SUMMARY Kenneth Cleveland and William Bickley sued Robert V. Johnson and Internet Specialties West, Inc. (IS West). At trial before a jury, they asserted claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and false promise in connection with a $75,000 investment made pursuant to a February 1995 agreement. The jury found no false promise, but awarded
Williams Hicks v. Pga Tour, Inc.public domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WILLIAMS MICHAEL HICKS; No. 16-15370 KENNETH HARMS, as Class Representative Plaintiffs and D.C. No. Individual Plaintiffs; MATTHEW 3:15-cv-00489-VC ACHATZ; BRANDON ANTUS; CHAD ANTUS; ANDREW BARNES; CHRIS BERRY; MICHAEL BESTOR; OPINION DUANE BOCK; DAVID BROOKER; MARK CARNES; STEVEN CATLIN; BRUCE CLENDENEN; GRAEME COURTS; MICHAEL DARBY; HENRY DIANA; DON DONATELLO; MICHAEL DOR
730 F.Supp.2d 401 (2010) QUINN CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. SKANSKA USA BUILDING, INC., et al. Civil Action No. 07-406. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 3, 2010. *403 B. Christopher Lee, Christopher I. McCabe, Jacoby Donner PC, Philadelphia, PA, Cary L. Flitter, Lundy Flitter Beldecos & Berger PC, Narberth, PA
Skanska USA Bldg. Inc. v Atlantic Yards B2 Owner, LLC (2016 NY Slip Op 06903) Skanska USA Bldg. Inc. v Atlantic Yards B2 Owner, LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 06903 Decided on October 20, 2016 Appellate Division, First Department Ac
Graves v. American Acceptance Mortgage Corp.public domain
ON rehearing Markman, J. The issue before the Court is whether a mortgage given on a loan and secured by the mortgagor’s property, the proceeds of which are used by the *610mortgagor to pay off a land contract debt and thereby acquire legal title to that property, is a purchase money mortgage and, if so, whether it is therefore entitled to priority o
Jihad Adbul-Mumit v. Alexandria Hyundai, LLCpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA
313 Ga. 375 FINAL COPY S21A1261, S21A1262, S21X1326, S22X0007. BLACK VOTERS MATTER FUND, INC. et al. v. KEMP et al.; and vice versa (four cases). S21A1263. SAUNDERS v. KEMP et al. ELLINGTON, Justice. On March 25, 2021, Governor Brian Kemp signed into law Senate Bill 9 (“SB 9”), which created from the former Augusta Judicial Circuit two new judicial circuits: the Columbia Judicial Circuit, comprised of Columbia County, and the Augu
Mueller v. Bohannonpublic domain
589 N.W.2d 852 (1999) 256 Neb. 286 John M. MUELLER and Janet Rae Mueller, husband and wife, appellants, and Cedar Valley Partnership, a Nebraska partnership, appellee, v. Howard J. BOHANNON and Grace Bohannon, husband and wife, and Harold B. McGowan and Shirley M. McGowan, husband and wife, appellees. No. S-97-1067. Supreme Court of Nebraska. Februar
New Hampshire Insurance v. Juellepublic domain
TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA Una vez más intervenimos en el caso de epígrafe el cual se presentó ante el foro recurrido en el año 2002. En enero de 2005 este Tribunal entendió en una controversia relativa a la comparecencia de la señora Teresa Sordo ante dicho foro y ordenamos al mismo la celebración de una vista. (KLCE-04-01478) En esta ocasión, la señora Sordo cuestiona la constitucionalidad de la Regla 51.7 de
Augenstein v. Augensteinpublic domain
Richard M. Rogers, Judge. I. Prologue This matter came on for trial to the bench on the complaint of the plaintiff, Earl R. Augenstein, the complaint of the intervenor, Eleanor Augenstein, and the answer of the defendants. The original complaint was filed by Earl R. Augen-stein, father of the defendants, alleging that two quitclaim deeds executed by him on February 20, 1996 were procured by fraud, and reques
Gordon v. Clifford Metal Sales Co.public domain
602 A.2d 535 (1992) Jeffrey S. GORDON v. CLIFFORD METAL SALES CO., INC. No. 90-241-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. January 23, 1992. *536 Douglas James Rose, McGovern & Noel, Ltd., Providence, for plaintiff. Susan Thurston, Diane Finkle, Allan Shine, Winograd & Shine, Providence, for defendant. <