⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Melissa Olson”

State v. Olsonpublic domain
North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007-03-22 · Published · cited 11× · 2007 ND 40; 729 N.W.2d 132; 2007 N.D. LEXIS 39; 2007 WL 852351
YANDE WALLE, Chief Justice. [¶ 1] Melissa Sue Olson and Bryan James Bienek appealed from the district court’s order denying their motions to suppress evidence and from the criminal judgments entered upon their conditional pleas of guilty to the offense of minor in consumption of alcohol. We conclude the district court did not err in denying Olson and Bienek’s motions to suppress evidence, and we affirm. I
District Court, D. Colorado · 2011-09-01 · Published · cited 1× · 814 F. Supp. 2d 1123; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98600; 2011 WL 3861433
814 F.Supp.2d 1123 (2011) Marian L. OLSON d/b/a Bannack Publishing Co., Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF GOLDEN, COLORADO, a Colorado Home Rule Municipal Corporation, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-cv-01851-MSK-KMT. United States District Court, D. Colorado. September 1, 2011. *1125 Mario D. Nicolais, II, Rebecca Reynolds Messall, Steve
Olson v. Loypublic domain
District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1996-10-23 · Published · cited 1× · 951 F. Supp. 225; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19206; 1996 WL 738751
ORDER ALAIMO, District Judge. Plaintiff, Duane R. Olson (“Olson”), brings this action against Defendants, Vie Loy (“Loy”), Robert Burns (“Burns”), and “others” as may be named later, for violations of his Constitutional rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241-42, 18 U.S.C. § 1964, and the Eighth Amendment. Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the altern
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2025-05-14 · Published · cited 2× · 568 P.3d 710; 2025 WY 53
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2025 WY 53 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2025 May 14, 2025 DAVID MARTORANO, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-24-0276 MELISSA MAZZEI f/k/a MELISSA MARTORANO, Appellee (Plaintiff).
Olson v. Berggrenpublic domain
South Dakota Supreme Court · 2021-09-29 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 S.D. 58
#29367-aff in pt & rev in pt-PJD 2021 S.D. 58 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** CLIFFORD WILLIAM OLSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MELISSA J. BERGGREN, EDWARD J. BICKEL and CHRISTINA MOLD, Defendants and Appellees. **** APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUI
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016-05-23 · Published · cited 58× · 822 F.3d 934; 2016 FED App. 0127P; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9374; 2016 WL 2957155
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 16a0127p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ MELISSA WILSON et al., ┐ Plaintiffs-Appellees, │
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017-06-16 · Published · cited 52× · 897 N.W.2d 491; 2017 WL 2610632; 2017 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 68
ZAGER, Justice. A plaintiff brought claims against her former attorney for legal malpractice, assault and battery, and punitive damages. At the close of the plaintiffs case, the district court granted the defendant’s motion for directed verdict on two legal malpractice claims: one regarding the preparation of a will and the other for breach of fiduciary duty. The district court submitted to the jury two claims of alleged legal
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012-02-07 · Published · cited 1× · 35 A.3d 404; 133 Conn. App. 377; 2012 Conn. App. LEXIS 60; 2012 WL 265744
35 A.3d 404 (2012) 133 Conn.App. 377 Richard BROOKS, et al. v. ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION, et al. No. 32632. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued November 7, 2011. Decided February 7, 2012. *405 Joseph J. Passaretti, Jr., Glastonbury, with whom, on the brief, was Sean B. Reidy, for the ap
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2023-10-10 · Published · cited 0×
Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017-06-16 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–2016 Filed June 16, 2017 MELISSA STENDER, Appellant, vs. ANTHONY ZANE BLESSUM, Appellee, MINNESOTA LAWYERS MUT. INS. CO., Intervenor-Appellee. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Douglas F. Staskal, Judge. A jury trial was held on plaintiff’s claims of legal malpractice, assault and battery, and punitive damages. The jury
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2025-11-25 · Published · cited 0×
In the Iowa Supreme Court No. 24–0029 Submitted October 7, 2025—Filed November 25, 2025 Robert Teig, Appellant, vs. Brad Hart, Tyler Olson, Ann Poe, Patrick Loeffler, Dale Todd, Scott Olson, and Ashley Vanorny, Appellees.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018-06-22 · Published · cited 28× · 191 A.3d 891
OPINION BY DUBOW, J.: Appellant, Niyazz Milburn, appeals from the Judgment of Sentence of 7½ to 20 years' incarceration following his jury conviction of Robbery, Firearms Not to be Carried Without a License, Carrying a Firearm in Public in Philadelphia, and Possession of an Instrument of Crime ("PIC"). 1 Appellant challenges th
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2017-07-07 · Published · cited 0× · 570 B.R. 408; 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 1888; 64 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 101
John K Olson, Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND MEMORANDUM OPINION THIS ADVERSARY PROCEEDING came before the Court for trial on April 26, 2017 on the Amended Adversary Complaint (“the Complaint”) [ECF 81] filed on December 16, 2015, by Scott N. Brown, as Chapter 7 Trustee (the “Plaintiff’ and/or “Trustee”) of the bankruptcy estate of Sigma-Tech Sales,
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018-05-08 · Published · cited 582× · 187 A.3d 266
OPINION BY DUBOW, J.: Appellant, Melissa R. Dempster, appeals from the Judgment of Sentence entered following the revocation of her probation. On appeal, Appellant challenges the discretionary aspects of her sentence, arguing that, in imposing a term of one to two years' imprisonment, the violation of probation ("VOP") court imposed a harsh and excessive sentence. Appellant's counsel fi
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2017-06-16 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–2016 Filed June 16, 2017 Amended September 5, 2017 MELISSA STENDER, Appellant, vs. ANTHONY ZANE BLESSUM, Appellee, MINNESOTA LAWYERS MUT. INS. CO., Intervenor-Appellee. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Douglas F. Staskal, Judge. A jury trial was held on plaintiff’s claims of legal malpractice,
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015-11-03 · Published · cited 2× · 335 Ga. App. 30; 779 S.E.2d 69
Dillard, Judge. Micah Schecter appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment in Auto-Owners Insurance Company’s (“Auto-Owners”) suit to recover workers’ compensation benefits that it paid to injured worker David Larios. On appeal, as he argued below, Schecter contends that (1) Auto-Owners’s failure to intervene in Larios’s action against Schecter forfeited th
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017-10-04 · Published · cited 3× · 806 S.E.2d 211; 343 Ga. App. 250
Dillard, Chief Judge. *250 Zelda Enterprises, LLLP, Tony Lamar McCall, and Gene Arlon McCall, Sr. ("appellants") appeal from the trial court's grant of a motion to disqualify counsel, which was filed by Tracy McCall Guarino, Angie McCall Sumpter, and Charles Wesley McCall, Jr. ("appellees")
District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2019-01-24 · Published · cited 2× · 357 F. Supp. 3d 848
STEPHANIE M. ROSE, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Before the Court are the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, [ECF Nos. 33; 35]. The parties requested a hearing on their motions, but the Court finds that the issues can be resolved without it. See LR 7(c). The parties' motions have been fully submitted and are ready for a decision. For the reasons set out below, the motions are DENIED. I. BACKG
C.L. v. Z.M.F.H.public domain
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011-03-17 · Published · cited 1× · 18 A.3d 1175; 2011 Pa. Super. 50; 2011 Pa. Super. LEXIS 63
OPINION BY ALLEN, J.: C.L. (“Father”) appeals the order dated July 15, 2010, and entered on July 20, 2010, in the Indiana County Court of Common Pleas, which declined jurisdiction over a custody dispute and dismissed Father’s custody petition. We affirm. Father and Z.M.F.H. (“Mother”) married on April 17, 1997. They are the parents of two children, Z.F.H.L. (d.o.b. 6/11/99) and C.S.F.H
District Court, D. Colorado · 2018-01-23 · Published · cited 64× · 285 F. Supp. 3d 1170
PHILIP A. BRIMMER, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary *1176Judgment on Its First Claim for Declaratory Relief [Docket No. 62], Defendant Owners Insurance Company's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 63], Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions and Testimony of De