⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Melissa M. Nelson”

People v. Nelsonpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2012-08-30 · Published · cited 37× · 209 Cal. App. 4th 698; 147 Cal. Rptr. 3d 183; 2012 Cal. App. LEXIS 1006
Opinion McCONNELL, P. J. Vera Nelson appeals an order recommitting her to the State Department of Mental Health for one year as a mentally disordered *703offender (MDO). (Pen. Code,§ 2960 et seq.) Nelson contends the trial court erred by (1) admitting the details of hearsay evidence in medical reports on which expert witnesses relied in forming their o
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-12-16 · Published · cited 1× · 134 N.Y.S.3d 234; 189 A.D.3d 1242; 2020 NY Slip Op 07576
Matter of Leonides M. M. (Melissa L. D.) (2020 NY Slip Op 07576) Matter of Leonides M. M. (Melissa L. D.) 2020 NY Slip Op 07576 Decided on December 16, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York St
In re Melissa M.public domain
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986-02-27 · Published · cited 1× · 127 N.H. 710; 506 A.2d 324; 1986 N.H. LEXIS 226
Batchelder, J. James M. appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Contas, J.) transferring custody of his daughter, Melissa M., to the division of welfare. We affirm. An investigation conducted in January 1984 by the division of welfare revealed evidence that Melissa M., then 4 1/2 years old, had been sexually abused by her father. In accordance with an ex parte order of the Concord Distric
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011-04-11 · Published · cited 0× · 426 F. App'x 532
ORDER ** We remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in *533NASA v. Nelson, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 746, 178 L.Ed.2d 667 (2011). IT IS SO ORDERED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not prec
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2016-07-12 · Published · cited 42× · 370 Wis. 2d 595; 2016 WI 65; 882 N.W.2d 738; 2016 Wisc. LEXIS 179
SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J. ¶ 27. (dissenting). The Wisconsin Constitution provides that "[ejxcept as otherwise provided hy law, the circuit court shall have original jurisdiction in all matters civil and criminal within this state and such appellate jurisdiction in the circuit as the legislature may prescribe by law." Wis. Const, art. VII, § 8 (emphasis added). ¶ 28. The instant case is an examp
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-06-04 · Published · cited 4× · 568 F.3d 1028; 29 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 257; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12073; 2009 WL 1607914
KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge, with whom CALLAHAN and BEA, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc: I join in Judge Callahan’s dissent from denial of rehearing en banc. Judge Callahan focuses on the drug treatment question and other inquiries to the applicant. I write to supplement her discussion of the other government conduct the panel held likely to be unconstitutional — the inquiri
District Court, C.D. California · 2013-02-12 · Published · cited 0× · 926 F. Supp. 2d 1120; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38470
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on six motions for summary judgment filed by Defendants in these related actions: (1) Defendant Crane Co.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (CV 12-00793, Docket No. 193); (2) Defendant The Nash Engineering Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment (CV 12-00793, Docket No. 195); (3) Defen
Nelson v. Nelsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019-08-07 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Harrison Shelby Nelson, Appellant/Respondent, v. Melissa Starr Nelson, Respondent/Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2017-000291 Appeal From Charleston County Daniel E. Martin, Jr., Family Court Judge Opinion No. 5678 Heard May 16, 2019 – Filed August
Johnson v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005-11-22 · Published · cited 13× · 623 S.E.2d 706; 276 Ga. App. 505; 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 3684; 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 1298
623 S.E.2d 706 (2005) 276 Ga. App. 505 JOHNSON v. The STATE. No. A05A2187. Court of Appeals of Georgia. November 22, 2005. *707 Melissa M. Nelson, Atlanta, for appellant. Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming, District Attorney, Leonora Grant, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. PHIPPS, Judge. <
New York City Family Court · 2016-11-30 · Published · cited 0× · 54 Misc. 3d 684; 42 N.Y.S.3d 580
OPINION OF THE COURT John M. Hunt, J. In this family offense proceeding under article 8 of the Family Court Act, the respondent has made the unprecedented request that his physical appearance before the court be dispensed with, and that he be permitted to participate and give testimony in the proceeding by electronic means, specifically by “telephone” from the offices of an attorney located in another state.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009-01-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 6, 2008 Session MELISSA MICHELLE COX v. M. A. PRIMARY AND URGENT CARE CLINIC, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. 51941 Royce Taylor, Judge No. M2007-01840-COA-R3-CV - Filed January 30, 2009 Plaintiff in medical malpractice action
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2022-08-25 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-22-00254-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE MELISSA MARIE LARA PEREZ On appeal from the 267th District Court of Victoria County, Texas. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva Memo
Brawner v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2004-09-13 · Published · cited 30× · 602 S.E.2d 612; 278 Ga. 316; 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 2986; 2004 Ga. LEXIS 614
602 S.E.2d 612 (2004) 278 Ga. 316 BRAWNER v. The STATE. No. S04A0898. Supreme Court of Georgia. September 13, 2004. *613 Melissa Martha Nelson, Atlanta, for appellant. John Thomas Morgan, III, barbara Blaine Conroy, Deputy Asst. Dist. Atty., Hon. Thurbert E. Baker, Atty. Gen., Raina Nadler, Asst. At
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2013-07-12 · Published · cited 0× · 834 N.W.2d 64; 92 A.L.R. 6th 655; 2013 WL 3483805; 2013 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 84; 97 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,869; 119 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 463
CADY, Chief Justice (concurring specially). I concur in the majority opinion, but write separately to further explain the basis and rationale for the decision. Melissa Nelson set forth a claim for sex discrimination recognized by law, but the facts of the case did not establish the claim. Our state and federal civil rights laws were enacted to eradicate various forms of discrimination f
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024-02-28 · Published · cited 0×
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 28, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-1702 Lower Tribunal Nos. AH7AWXE, AH7AXME, AH7AX0E, AH7DXRE, AH7AWYE, AH7DXPE, AH7CXJE ________________ Melissa Patino,
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024-04-10 · Published · cited 0×
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 10, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-1702 Lower Tribunal Nos. AH7AWXE, AH7AXME, AH7AX0E, AH7DXRE, AH7AWYE, AH7DXPE, AH7CXJE ________________ Melissa Patino,
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2003-06-05 · Published · cited 1× · 126 S.W.3d 106; 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 4827; 2003 WL 21299816
OPINION TERRY JENNINGS, Justice. Appellants, Melissa Smith, individually and as next friend of William Lee Smith, *108 Edward Daniel Smith, and Jedidiah Keith Smith, minors, and on behalf of the estate of Danny Smith, deceased; Linda Smith, individually and on behalf of the
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023-12-05 · Published · cited 10× · 87 F.4th 833
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0265p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ BRADLEY M. PETERSON, Ph.D., │ Plain
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2006-11-09 · Published · cited 0× · 153 P.3d 724; 2006 UT App 457; 564 Utah Adv. Rep. 28; 2006 Utah App. LEXIS 490; 2006 WL 3231261
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 726 OPINION ¶ 1 A.M.W. (Mother) appeals the Third District Juvenile Court's (juvenile court) order terminating her parental rights in her daughter, A.M.D., a minor child. We affirm. BACKGROUND1 ¶ 2 Mother and S
Arizona Supreme Court · 2022-03-01 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA MELISSA VARELA, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. FCA US LLC, ET AL., Defendants/Appellees. No. CV-20-0157-PR Filed March 1, 2022 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County The Honorable Connie Contes, Ju