Cases

\\|"12|_"9 '70 ; /7/'3’» Be/’H~M Herzriec`g\> ' \_) , , Heo\z§ie;L,-sm\ £dur\fl`j \'/\,H=.L,‘c:{' C`lr'af~/ /AB £¢ T~¢/E’K. S'{`. @/n 303 § ~>/ j . .- , H""H)zz)\; l€,)<>c§.S 713 7b1 .RZ! £)¢v/)¢'§:§"`C. LL)¢"((\‘€,v \Bai'lnc// 'BL°@ <,/c.s C`.L} § `/) §§ 3 10 o. < c ,; we p

681 S.E.2d 374 (2009) Julia Catherine BOSEMAN, Plaintiff, v. Melissa Ann JARRELL, Defendant, and Melissa Ann Jarrell, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Julia Catherine Boseman and the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Third-Party Defendants. No. COA08-957. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 18, 2009. *3

STROUD, Judge. *438I. Background On 21 July 2003, Sheryl Boylan (“plaintiff’) was injured while working for Verizon Wireless, which is insured by Sedgwick CMS (“defendants”). The facts surrounding plaintiff’s injury and subsequent treatment are laid out in Boylan v. Verizon Wireless, 201 N.C. App. 81, 685 S.E.2d 155 (2009) (“Boylan

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 394PA21 Filed 6 April 2023 MICHAEL MOLE’ v. CITY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, a municipality On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 279 N.C. App. 583, 866 S.E.2d 773 (2021), affirming the trial court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s Article I, Section 19 claims and reversing the trial co

ORDER ROBERT W. PRATT, U.S. DISTRICT COURT Before the Court are two motions: (1) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 (Clerk’s No. 262); and (2)Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Reimbursement of Litigation Expenses, and Class Representative Service Awards (Clerk’s No. 263). A fairness hearing was held on January 21, 2016. Clerk’

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON February 2, 2010 Session ANDREW THOMAS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 00-03095 James C. Beasley, Jr., Judge No. W2008-01941-CCA-R3-PD - Filed February 23, 2011 Petitioner Andrew Thomas appeals as of right the judgment of the Shelby County Cri

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr