Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Melissa Ann Collins”
Ann Breakey v. Department of Treasurypublic domain
Murray, C.J. *399 *517 The question presented is whether petitioner, Ann Breakey, as a result of an irrevocable trust granting her the ability to remain in the marital home rent-free in order to
Melissa Ann Bobo v. Tennessee Valley Authoritypublic domain
ED CARNES, Chief Judge: In return for the loan of life, we each owe God a death. 1 Payment in full is a nonnegotiable term of the debt, but the timing and circumstances in which remittance is made varies. The question that lies at the bottom of this case is whether the Tennessee Valley Authority caused Barbara Bobo to
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2025 WY 53 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2025 May 14, 2025 DAVID MARTORANO, Appellant (Defendant), v. S-24-0276 MELISSA MAZZEI f/k/a MELISSA MARTORANO, Appellee (Plaintiff).
256 F.Supp.2d 557 (2003) MELISSA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION and City of Melissa, Texas, Plaintiffs, v. NORTH COLLIN WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION and United States Department of Agriculture acting by and through Ann M. Veneman, Secretary of Agriculture, Defendants. No. 4:02-CV-345. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division. April 8, 2003.
316 F.Supp.2d 421 (2004) MELISSA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, and City of Melissa, Texas, Plaintiffs, v. NORTH COLLIN WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION and United States Department of Agriculture, acting by and through Ann M. Veneman, Secretary of Agriculture, Defendants. Civil Action No. 4:02-CV-345. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division. March 31, 2004.
State of Tennessee v. Melissa Ann Laymanpublic domain
GARY R. WADE, J., concurring and dissenting. Although I concur in part, I must respectfully dissent. In my view, the trial *455court did not abuse its discretion by denying the Rule 48(a) motion in either case. Accordingly, I would affirm the judgments of the Court of Criminal Appeals. While prosecut
Greystar, LLC v. Melissa Adamspublic domain
OPINION Opinion by Justice O’NEILL. The underlying lawsuit in this appeal involves the circumstances surrounding Appellee Melissa Adams’s termination from employment with appellant Greystar, LLC. 1 Appellee allegedly served appellant; however, appellant failed to answer. The trial court entered
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 6, 2006 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MELISSA ANN LAYMAN Appeal by Permission from the Court of Criminal Appeals Criminal Court for Anderson County No. A3CR0257 James B. Scott, Jr., Judge No. E2004-01471-SC-R11-CD - Filed on January 29, 2007
Melissa Mays v. Rick Snyderpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 17a0167p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 16-1684 ┐ BEATRICE BOLER; EDWIN ANDERSON; ALLINA │ ANDERSON; EPCO SALES, LLC, │
Melissa Mays v. Governor Rick Snyderpublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Stephen J. Markman
Holladay v. Rockwell Collins, Inc.public domain
STEPHANIE M. ROSE, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Before the Court are the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, [ECF Nos. 33; 35]. The parties requested a hearing on their motions, but the Court finds that the issues can be resolved without it. See LR 7(c). The parties' motions have been fully submitted and are ready for a decision. For the reasons set out below, the motions are DENIED. I. BACKG
Melissa Mays v. City of Flint, Mich.public domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 17a0212p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT MELISSA MAYS; MICHAEL MAYS; JACQUELINE ┐ PEMBERTON; KEITH JOHN PEMBERTON; ELNORA │ CARTHAN; RHONDA KELSO,
Melissa Mays v. Governor Rick Snyderpublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Stephen J. Markman
Commonwealth v. Collinspublic domain
Gants, CJ. A jury in the Superior Court convicted the defendant of murder in the second degree for the killing of Myles Lawton. The defendant also was convicted of armed assault with intent to murder for the shooting of Pierre Laguerre, and of possession of an unlicensed firearm. 1 </
Mowan v. Bergpublic domain
Filed 4/28/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2015 ND 95 Darin Jeffrey Mowan, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Brittney Ann Berg, Defendant and A
04/29/2020 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 30, 2019 Session MELISSA MARTIN, ET AL. v. ROLLING HILLS HOSPITAL, LLC, ET AL. Appeal by Permission from the Court of Appeals Circuit Court for Williamson County No.
Jo-Ann Shuma v. Gary Michael Powerpublic domain
REVERSE and REMAND; and Opinion Filed July 9, 2015. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00623-CV JO-ANN SHUMA, Appellant V. GARY MICHAEL POWER, Appellee On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court
Amazing Paws v. Melissa Pedrazapublic domain
Opinion issued March 5, 2026. In the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00475-CV ——————————— AMAZING PAWS, LLC, Appellant v. MELISSA PEDRAZA, Appellee On Appe
Mays v. City of Flintpublic domain
John Corbett O'Meara, United States District Judge Before the court is Plaintiffs' motion for remand, which has been fully briefed. Pursuant to L.R. 7.1, the court did not hear oral argument, as this matter has been thoroughly and sufficiently presented in the briefs. BACKGROUND FACTS This case arises out of the water crisis in Flint, Michigan, in which the city's drinking
OPINION JAMES T. CAMPBELL, Justice. In this appeal from a divorce decree, Johannes Everse and Melissa (“Lea”) Ev-erse both challenge the trial court’s characterization of assets held in accounts. We will affirm in part and reverse in part and remand for the trial court to reconsider its division of the marital estate. Background