Cases

SWOFFORD, Presiding Judge. This is a civil action seeking damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff-respondent when she was struck by an automobile driven by defendant-appellant as she attempted to walk across Prospect Avenue in Kansas City, Missouri. Trial was to the court sitting without a jury. The defendant-appellant conceded the issue of liability, and chose to have the case tried only on the issue of damages. The trial

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Melba Utica Packing Co., Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hurowitz, J.), entered October 17, 1994, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination denying the motion by Melba Utica Packing Co., Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and (2) so much of an order of t

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont __________________ NO. 09-24-00272-CV __________________ MELBA JAMES, Appellant V. ANCHOR BOATLIFTS LLC AND JASON MILLER, Appellees ___________________________________________________

TOM S. LEE, District Judge: I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS On January 28, 1992, pursuant to a plea agreement of the same date, Melba Asset pled guilty to one count of a nine-count indictment charging her with uttering altered government checks in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 495. 1

.BALEY, Judge. Plaintiffs make two basic contentions: (1) that the restrictive covenants applying to Robinson Heights Subdivision forbid the construction of any dwelling within 15 feet of the interior lot lines of Lots 3, 4 and 5 of Block E as shown on the original plat of the subdivision; and (2) that defendants are “attempting to violate” the restrictive covenants by petitioning authorities to permit, withdrawal of unused st

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-13-00069-CV Clifton E. Wolf, Melba R. Wolf, Mary Ellen Castillo, and James Allen Reinarz, M.D., Appellants v. Highland Haven Property Owners Association, Inc.; Shady Acres Property Owners Association, Inc.; and Kathleen Barnett, as Independent Executrix of the Est

WITHDRAWN 10-12-11 REISSUED 10-12-11 IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11-00089-CV BEN L. RICHARDSON, SR. AND MELBA RICHARDSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SURVIVING HEIRS OF JOHN KENNEDY RICHARDSON AND AS NEXT FRIENDS OF MINOR CHILDREN, SARAH RICHARDSON, JOHN RICHARDSON, AND JOSHUA RICHARDSON; SUNSHINE

WITHDRAWN 10-12-11 REISSUED 10-12-11 IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

CHEHARDY, Judge. Plaintiff, Melba Campbell Adams, filed suit against her husband, Dolvis Eric Adams, for separation from bed and board under C.C. art. 138(5), namely, abandonment without just cause. Defendant denied plaintiff’s allegations and reconvened for a separation asserting he left the matrimonial domicile with just cause in that his wife was guilty of cruel treatment. C.C. art. 138(3). From a judgment granting Mrs. Ada

529 A.2d 122 (1987) FLEET NATIONAL BANK, as Trustee Under the Will of Samuel Pomeroy Colt v. Samuel P. COLT et al. No. 86-89-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. July 14, 1987. *123 William P. Robinson, Edwards & Angell, Judith Savage, Edwards & Angell, Providence, for plaintiff. A. David Tammelleo, Providence, f

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-98-00323-CV Mary Adams, Annabella Campbell, Caroline Cordts, Melody Davis, Diana Deem, Nicole French, Melba Hyde, Christine

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Plaintiffs appeal the district court’s order sua sponte dismissing their complaint against Defendants for failure to state a claim, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Allran v. Wells Fargo, No. 3:10-cv-00200-GCM

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FRANCISCO A. BESOSA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are the parties’ arguments as to whether the automatic stay provision of the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”) applies to these three actions. For the following reasons, the Court holds that it does and STAYS these cases pursuant to section 405(b)(1) of PROME-SA. The Court will h

433 B.R. 792 (2010) In re James SPICKELMIRE and Betty Spickelmire, Debtors. C. Barry Zimmerman, Plaintiff, v. William James Spickelmire; Betty J. Spickelmire; Jerry L. Alley; Bruce Battles; Gregory J. Cenac; Gwen Cenac; Terry L. Fogelstrom; Rodney K. Gortsema; Matthew Steven Green; Mitchell James Green; Molly Kathryn Green; Arley Haener; Irene Haener; Richard J. Haener; John L. Hauntz; Carol Sue Hauntz; Killgore Adventures, LLC; Charles Roy L

MEMORANDUM OPINION Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from Judgment RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiff, an African-American female employee at the National Zoological Park (“the National Zoo”), brought suit against the defendant, the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institute, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 4

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-07-00112-CV

993 F.Supp. 565 (1998) Dee I. CHANCE, et al. v. Kent C. SULLIVAN, et al. No. CIV.A. G-97-282. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division. February 5, 1998. John F. Nichols, Houston, TX, W. Mark Lanier, Lanier Parker and Sullivan, Houston, TX, for Dee I. Chance. Michael Louis Minns, Houston, TX, Ken N. Bigham, Jr., Schulenburg, TX, for J. Cha

970 F.2d 785 Melba J. BURRELL, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.The BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF GA. MILITARY COLLEGE, et al., Defendants,Jacob L. Goldstein, etc., and Alva L. Baggarly, etc.,Defendants-Appellants.Melba J. BURRELL, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.The BD. OF TRUSTEES OF GA. MILITARY COLLEGE, Alva L.Baggarly, Individually & in his official capacity as ChiefExec. Officer of First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. ofMilledgeville,

Judgment rendered September 25, 2019. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 992, La. C. Cr. P. No. 52,867-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** STATE OF LOUISIANA