⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

9 opinions for “Melanie Burns Asher”

Rule Vii 2019 Listpublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2019-06-20 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 Ark. 234
Cite as 2019 Ark. 234 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE UPDATED LIST OF Opinion Delivered: June 20, 2019 ATTORNEYS SUSPENDED FOR FAILURE TO PAY 2019 ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM On April 25, 2019, we issued an opinion pursuant to Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar identifying attorneys who were suspended from the practice of la
Trinh v. Homanpublic domain
District Court, C.D. California · 2018-09-06 · Published · cited 25× · 333 F. Supp. 3d 984
CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION The seven named Petitioners bring this Habeas Corpus Petition and Class Action Complaint on behalf of themselves and a putative class of Vietnamese citizens who immigrated to the United States before *9871995. (Dkt. 27 [First Amended Habeas Corpus P
Gomez v. Hurtadopublic domain
Idaho Supreme Court · 2024-08-06 · Published · cited 0× · 554 P.3d 53
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 50279-2022 JOHN GOMEZ, an individual, ) ) Plaintiff-Counterdefendant- ) Boise, May 2024 Term Appellant, ) ) Opinion filed: August 6, 2024 v. )
Idaho Supreme Court · 2024-02-22 · Published · cited 8× · 544 P.3d 135
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 49801 JENNIFER PICKERING and CHRIS ) PICKERING, ) ) Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants- ) Respondents, ) ) v. )
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-06-23 · Published · cited 31× · 27 F. Supp. 3d 447; 2014 WL 2815645; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 86765
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, District Judge. INTRODUCTION On March 29, 2013, we issued a Memorandum and Order granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiffs’1 complaints, which alleged that they suffered injury based on the defendants’ manipulation of the London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). In re LIBOR-Base
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002-08-14 · Published · cited 27× · 215 F. Supp. 2d 795; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16929; 2002 WL 1869869
215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-06-12 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00390-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 9:25:40 PM