Cases

OPINION & ORDER HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge: Plaintiff Katrina Wear brings this action for judicial review of the Commissioner’s final decision denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act and Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) under Title II of the Social Security Act. This Court has jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (incorporated by 42’ U

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1540 ESIN E. ARAKAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Timothy M. Cain, Distr

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WALTER HERBERT RICE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Court has reviewed’ the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. # 13), to whom this case was - referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § .636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expire

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: On June 22, 2012, Plaintiff Juan Rolon commenced this action for review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”), denying his application for Social Security Disability (“SSD”) and Supplemental Security Insurance (“SSI”) benefits. Dkt. No. 2. The Defendant moves for a judgment on the pleadings, affirmin

OPINION This petition for writ of mandamus involves the question of whether the Navajo Nation Labor Commission (Commission) should have recused the entire sitting panel and all former members of the Commission from hearing Petitioner Evelyn Meadows’ employment complaint under the Navajo Preference in Employment Act (NPEA) on the basis of a prior professional relationship, namely, that Petitioner had served previously as a Lab

USCA11 Case: 21-12314 Document: 131-1 Date Filed: 03/14/2025 Page: 1 of 169 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-12314 ____________________ NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIAT

INTRODUCTION This is an appeal from an order of the defendant, the department of social services (department), suspending the plaintiffs, Barry W. Hultman and Dorothy Hultman, from the medicaid program and ordering restitution by the plaintiffs, to the department, of overpayments received by the plaintiffs. The facts are as follows. During the period from October 1, 1993, through September 30, 1995, Countryside Manor, Inc. (Countryside), w

307 S.E.2d 625 (1983) Cebert M. MEADOWS, et al. v. Gretchen O. LEWIS, Commr., etc. No. 15838. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. July 7, 1983. Rehearing Denied October 20, 1983. *628 Dan L. Hardway, Sterl F. Shinaberry, Charleston, for petitioners. Donald L. Hall, Sr. Counsel, Legal Div., Workers'

709 P.2d 928 (1985) BEAVER MEADOWS, a partnership; Donald B. Weixelman; Diane Weixelman; O.J. Harvey; Mary Christine Harvey; Charles B. McKibben; Louise S. DiLuzio; Ronald H. Fox; Roberta M. Fox; Allen Zohn; Ruth Zohn; Ronald Lee Sell; Joann Sell; Christopher J. Cannon; Becky J. Cannon; Steven W. Hanson; Marilyn M. Hanson; Rosemary Simone; Robert Simone; Vernon L. Rider; William Melvin Dewar II; Pat D. Boyd; Shirley J. Boyd; Gerald Wayne Moore; James E.

711 F.Supp.2d 697 (2008) SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORPORATION and AAA Bonding Agency, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. H-05-cv-2159. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. March 24, 2008. *700 Joseph S. Grinstein, Susman Godfrey LLP, Alan

WORKMAN, Justice: Nearly two years after Petitioner Jerry S. Straub was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol (“DUI”), Respondent Pat S. Reed, Commissioner of the West Virginia Division of Motor Vehicles (hereinafter the “DMV”), issued an order revoking his driver’s license. On appeal, the Office of Administrative Hearings (the “OAH”), affirmed the license revocation. The circuit court uph

*649Justice Stevens announced the judgment of the Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II, III, and VI, an opinion with respect to Parts IV and VII, in which Justice Souter, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice Breyer join, and an opinion with respect to Part V, in which Justice Souter and Justice Ginsburg join. In response to i

538 U. S. 1 (2003) PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICAv.WALSH, ACTING COMMISSIONER, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL. No. 01-188. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 22, 2003. Decided May 19, 2003. A State participating in Medicaid must have a med

395 Mass. 382 (1985) 480 N.E.2d 609 RAYMOND CHAMPAGNE vs. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION[1] & others.[2] Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Norfolk. March 6, 1985. July 11, 1985. Present: HENNESSEY, C.J., WILKINS, ABRAMS, NOLAN, & LYNCH, JJ. Arthur B. Leavens for the plaintiff. John A. A

ACCEPTED 15-25-00005-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/25/2025 2:57 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE No. 15-25-00005-CV CLERK FILED IN 15th COURT OF APPEALS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ANITA ASPHY and TONY ASPHY, No. 85200-1-I Respondents, DIVISION ONE v. PUBLISHED OPINION STATE OF WASHINGTON, Petitioner. BIRK, J. — Relying on H.B.H. v. State, 192 Wn.2d 154, 429 P.3d 484 (2018), siblings Anita and Tony Asph

LOUGHRY, Justice: The petitioner, Verizon Services Corp. ("Verizon"), appeals the February 22, 2017, final order of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County affirming a decision of the respondent, the Board of Review of Workforce West Virginia ("Board"), that granted twenty-five Verizon employees, respondents herein ("the claimants" 1

WADDILL, Commissioner. The appeal is from a judgment upholding a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board awarding compensation to Mrs. Nannie F. Meadows as the dependent of her unmarried son, Robert Meadows, who was found' dead in the truck he operated as an employee of the appellant company. The Board found that his accidental death occurred while he was in the course of his employment and that his mother was totally d

PALMER, J. The issue that we must resolve in this appeal is whether the plaintiff, Peter Gould, the sole member of a single-member limited liability company, Intervale Group, LLC (Intervale), qualifies as Intervale's employee for purposes of the Workers' Compensation Act (act), General Statutes § 31-275 et seq., and is therefore eligible for concurrent compensation benefits from the def

Judgment rendered June 23, 2021. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C. Cr. P. No. 53,724-KW No. 53,725-KW (Consolidated Cases) COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT