⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

14 opinions for “McNeece v. E-Logic Inc”

Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987-11-24 · Published · cited 20× · 533 A.2d 671; 311 Md. 194; 1987 Md. LEXIS 301
McAULIFFE, Judge. Pleased with his promotion to sergeant, but chagrined by the absence of any increase in his salary, firefighter John T. *196McNeece sought administrative relief from the Montgomery County Fire and Rescue Commission. Unsuccessful there, as well as before the Montgomery County Merit System Protection Boar
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019-10-30 · Published · cited 0×
Dominique Guillaume v. Chantal Guillaume, No. 2928, September Term 2018, filed. Opinion by Beachley, J. IN BANC APPEALS – RESERVATION OF ISSUES IN BANC APPEALS – REQUIREMENTS FOR NOTICE FOR IN BANC REVIEW Facts: Dominique Guillaume (“Father”) and Chantal Guillaume (“Mother”) are the parents of three children. On May 10, 2017, the parties executed a “Memorandum of Agreement” in an effort to resolve legal and physical custody, child support, alimony, and some property issues. Two days later,
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014-12-12 · Published · cited 3× · 774 F.3d 280; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 23433; 2014 WL 7014371
RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. The majority’s long-overdue opinion (oral argument was held over two years ago, on 3 December 2012), reviews cross-motions for summary judgment. I concur, of course, in the majority’s holding that the substantive-due-process claim by Taylor Bell’s mother is waived and that qualified immunity precl
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015-08-20 · Published · cited 33× · 799 F.3d 379; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14630; 2015 WL 4979135
Case: 12-60264 Document: 00513162565 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2015 No. 12-60264
Abrams v. Lamonepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007-03-26 · Published · cited 15× · 919 A.2d 1223; 398 Md. 146; 2007 Md. LEXIS 126
ELDRIDGE, J., concurring: I agree with the result in this case on the ground that Mr. Perez has not been a member of the Maryland Bar for ten years. I disagree, however, with Chief Judge Bell’s opinion which is joined by two other members of the Court. Article V, § 4, of the Constitution of Maryland sets forth the qualifications for a person
State v. Pereapublic domain
New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000-11-13 · Published · cited 17× · 130 N.M. 46; 2001 NMCA 002; 16 P.3d 1105
OPINION KENNEDY, Judge. {1} Defendant Paul Perea appeals his conviction for “Contributing to delinquency of minor” (CDM), a fourth degree felony pursuant to NMSA 1978, § 30-6-3 (1963, as amended through 1990). He argues that he should have been convicted of the more specific misdemeanor crime of “Selling or giving alcoholic beverages to a minor; possession” pursuant to NMSA 1
State v. Pereapublic domain
New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001-01-09 · Published · cited 16× · 16 P.3d 1105
16 P.3d 1105 (2000) 2001-NMCA-002 STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul PEREA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 20,382. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. November 13, 2000. Certiorari Granted January 9, 2001. *1107 Patricia A. Madrid, Attorney General, Anita Carlson, Assistant Attorney Ge
Doe v. Doepublic domain
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2001-02-22 · Published · cited 0× · 99 Haw. 24; 52 P.3d 278; 2001 Haw. App. LEXIS 34
DISSENTING OPINION OF LIM, J. In Blackshear v. Blackshear, 52 Haw. 480, 478 P.2d 852 (1971), the appellant filed in the lower court certain motions by which he sought to modify the amount of child support owing on account of the four minor children decreed to be his in a divorce granted some three years before. In the motions, appellant also sought to deny his paternity of two of the four. Id.
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2005-04-11 · Published · cited 29× · 873 A.2d 1122; 386 Md. 516; 2005 Md. LEXIS 182
873 A.2d 1122 (2005) 386 Md. 516 Mieczyslaw BIENKOWSKI v. Jonathan Paul BROOKS. No. 34, September Term, 2003. Court of Appeals of Maryland. April 11, 2005. Reconsideration Denied June 7, 2005. *1125 Daniel M. Clements (John E. Raine, III, Salsbury, Clements, Bekman, Marder & Adkins, LL
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014-12-16 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 12, 2014 No. 12-60264 Lyle W. Cayce
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000-12-29 · Published · cited 6× · 764 A.2d 378; 136 Md. App. 203; 2000 Md. App. LEXIS 216
764 A.2d 378 (2000) 136 Md. App. 203 Gary W. LANGSTON v. Lori K. LANGSTON. No. 55, Sept. Term, 2000. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. December 29, 2000. *380 Jo Benson Fogel (Farida Moreau Robinson, on the brief), Rockville, for appellant. Allen J. Kruger, Laurel, for appellee. Argued be
Evans v. Evanspublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992-03-02 · Published · cited 4× · 595 So. 2d 988; 1992 WL 38470
595 So.2d 988 (1992) John M. EVANS and State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Appellants, v. Barbara Jean EVANS, Appellee. No. 91-2422. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. March 2, 1992. Joseph R. Boyd and William H. Branch of Boyd & Branch, Tallahassee, and Chriss Walker, Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services,
Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999-05-17 · Published · cited 12× · 729 A.2d 965; 354 Md. 234; 1999 Md. LEXIS 252
729 A.2d 965 (1999) 354 Md. 234 The MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE v. Darla J. THEISS. No. 123, Sept. Term, 1998. Court of Appeals of Maryland. May 17, 1999. *966 William R. Phelan, Jr., Principal Counsel (Frank C. Derr, Deputy City Sol.; James L. Prichard, Asst. Sol., Dept. of Law, all on brief), Bal
Special Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 1982-01-25 · Published · cited 14× · 531 F. Supp. 1191
531 F.Supp. 1191 (1981) In the Matter of The VALUATION PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTIONS 303(c) AND 306 OF the REGIONAL RAIL REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1973. Misc. No. 76-1. Special Court, Regional Rail Reorganization Act. November 24, 1981. On Petitions for Reconsideration January 25, 1982. *1192 *1193