Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MONTANA WILDLIFE No. 20-35609 FEDERATION; THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY; NATIONAL AUDUBON D.C. No. SOCIETY; NATIONAL WILDLIFE 4:18-cv-00069- FEDERATION; MONTANA BMM AUDUBON, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior; DONATO JUDICE, in hi

BENHAM, Justice. These cases involve the scope of the State’s authority to regulate so-called “payday loans” pursuant to OCGA § 16-17-1 et seq., which has come to be known as the Payday Lending Act. Pursuant to OCGA § 16-17-4 (b), the State of Georgia, acting through the Attorney General (“State”) filed a complaint in Fulton County Superior Court alleging that CashCall, Inc. (“CashCall”), Delbert Services Corporation (“Delbe

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. John Taylor and Carolyn Taylor, husband and wife, each sold life insurance as employees of Western and Southern Life Insurance Company and Western-Southern Life Assurance Company (collectively “Western-Southern”). After a series of racially discriminatory incidents, Mrs. Taylor was fired and Mr. Taylor resigned. Mr. Taylor filed a race discrimination claim with the EEOC and received a right to sue lett

966 F.2d 1188 59 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 625,59 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,638, 61 USLW 2143 John L. TAYLOR and Carolyn M. Taylor,Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants,v.WESTERN AND SOUTHERN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY andWestern-Southern Life Assurance Company,Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees. Nos. 90-3859, 91-1057. United States Court of Appeals,<

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 Shanklin v. Norfolk No. 01-6449 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2004 FED App. 0156P (6th Cir.) Southern Railway Co. File Name: 04a0156p.06 _________________ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

(2008) Juli LEWIS, individually and on behalf of the Heirs at Law of Darlene Lewis, deceased, Plaintiff, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant. No. 06-2724 STA-tmp. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. June 12, 2008. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT S. THOMAS ANDERSON, District Judge.

55 Cal.App.4th 1139 (1997) NGUON SEANG BE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. WESTERN TRUCK EXCHANGE, Defendant and Respondent. IVECO TRUCKS OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant; PENSKE TRUCK LEASING COMPANY, Cross-defendant and Respondent. Docket No. B083162. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two. June 17, 1997.

99 F.Supp.2d 966 (2000) Andrew STOKES, Plaintiff, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Norfolk Southern Corporation, and Robert Williamson, Defendants. No. 1:99CV0518RM. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. May 17, 2000. *967 *968 Christopher C. Myers, Christopher M

McKAY, Circuit Judge. The issue in this case is whether an indigent person facing incarceration in a civil contempt action for nonsupport is entitled to have appointed counsel. The relevant facts are not in dispute. After his divorce from his wife, petitioner was ordered to pay $500 per month in child support. Of this amount, $380 represented the chil

G-uerey, J. On March 12, 1932, LeRoy McLain was em*178ployed by the Southern Cotton Oil Company as a cooker of cottonseed. On that date he sustained an accident to his eye, from which flowed naturally and unavoidably a disease (these facts being held by a subsequent division of this opinion) which caused him to lose the sight of his right eye. He attended, at the directio

631 F.Supp. 1294 (1986) Renee WRIGHT, as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Jan Jaroslav Stehlik, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHERN MONO HOSPITAL DISTRICT dba Mammoth Hospital District, Inc., Otis Clasby, Floyd B. Parks, M.D., James Vawter, M.D., Karen Tierney, M.D., Defendants. No. Civ. S-83-543 RAR. United States District Court, E.D. California. April 1, 1986.

Hallam, J. (dissenting). I dissent. It is the law of the Federal jurisdictions that reasonable municipal regulation of the speed of interstate trains is a valid exercise of the police power, to which the interstate carrier is obliged to conform. Southern Ry. Co. v. King, 217 U. S. 524, 30 Sup. Ct. 594, 54 L. ed. 868; Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Blackwell, 244 U. S. 310, 37 Sup. Ct. 640, 61 L.

FORESTER, D.J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which MOORE, J., joined. ROGERS, J. (pp. 994-98), delivered a separate concurring opinion except as to PartV. OPINION FORESTER, Chief District Judge. Defendant-Appellant Norfolk Southern Railway Company (“Norfolk”) appeals the district court’s denial of its renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law filed following a jury tria

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 19, 2007 Session TENNIE MARTIN and ROYA MITCHELL, Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of KATHRYN L. MARTIN, deceased, and TENNIE MARTIN and ROYA MITCHELL, Individually, as next-of-kin and heirs-at-law of KATHRYN L. MARTIN, deceased, et al., v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and ANTHONY D. WORLEY Direct Appeal from th

Opinion op the Court by Drury, Commissioner — Reversing. Appellant sued appellee for seven hundred dollars damages which he alleges resulted to a flock of his sheep on account of their having been chased, and some of them *505bitten by the appellee’s dog, which, appellant alleges, was at the time rabid, and as a result of the biting so

This appeal is from a denial and dismissal by the circuit court of a petition for mandamus, in which appellant sought to have the Judge of the Probate Court of Madison County dismiss an amended petition of the City of Huntsville for condemnation of certain lands of appellant for the widening and straightening of a railroad crossing and one of its approaches. The amended petition for condemnation by the City of Huntsville was heard before Hon. Ashford Todd, as Judge of Probate,

373 S.W.2d 904 (1963) Mrs. Gertie S. DISPEKER v. The NEW SOUTHERN HOTEL COMPANY. Supreme Court of Tennessee. December 5, 1963. *905 Moss & Benton, Schneider, Schneider & Harris, Jackson, George O. Benton, Victor F. Schneider, Jackson, of counsel, for complainant. William E. Leech, Franklin Murchison, Jackson, for defendant.

The procedure and result in this case constitute a contradiction in terms. Here complainants assert ownership of land and attack as a cloud upon their title a tax sale to the State which the Land Commissioner struck from the rolls under instructions of the Attorney General. The State is party defendant. The State, through its pleadings, asserts it has no interest in the land. By special demurrer it says the land had been stricken from the tax rolls "and the State of Mississippi therefore has

DOBIE, Circuit Judge. These cases are before us on petitions by Western Electric Company and Point Breeze Employees Association (hereinafter referred to as the Company and the Association, respectively) to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter called the Board) issued on August 9, 1944, in a case under Section 10 of the National Labor Relations Act (herein called the Act), 29 U.

WATKINS, District Judge. This is a suit in equity, brought by Southern Railway Company against the South Carolina' Railroad Commission and its individual members, and the Attorney General and Assistant Attorney General of the state, to enjoin the enforcement of an order of the Commission requiring the railway company to switch, receive, and deliver over and upon three of its side tracks at Union, S. C., carloads of freight tendered