⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “McKinney v. McKinney”

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018-12-18 · Published · cited 0× · 821 S.E.2d 902
AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017-05-16 · Published · cited 1× · 799 S.E.2d 280; 2017 WL 2118662; 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 393
DILLON, Judge. Joseph A. McKinney, Jr., ("Father") appeals from two orders of the district court entered during the course of a dispute between Father and Ginger A. McKinney (Sutphin) ("Mother") regarding the custody of their adolescent son, Max. 1 Specifically, Father appeals (1) the district court's September 2015 order findi
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2014-01-23 · Published · cited 0× · 367 N.C. 288; 753 S.E.2d 678; 2014 WL 300809; 2014 N.C. LEXIS 46
1. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA12-1152) 2. Pit’s Conditional PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 1. Denied 2. Dismissed as Moot Beasley, J., recused
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013-07-16 · Published · cited 0× · 228 N.C. App. 300; 745 S.E.2d 356; 2013 WL 3662149; 2013 N.C. App. LEXIS 754
STEELMAN, Judge. Where our prior opinion directed the trial court to award fees for the time that an expert witness actually spent testifying in court, but not for time spent preparing for trial, the trial court erred in awarding additional *301fees based upon the time that the expert spent waiting in court. The trial court did not err in awarding attorney’s fees to p
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011-12-06 · Published · cited 0× · 720 S.E.2d 29; 217 N.C. App. 400
720 S.E.2d 29 (2011) McKINNEY v. McKINNEY. No. COA11-496. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Filed December 6, 2011. Case Reported Without Published Opinion Affirmed in part, Vacated in part and Remanded.
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014-03-18 · Published · cited 15× · 507 B.R. 534
MEMORANDUM OPINION THOMAS P. AGRESTI, Bankruptcy Judge. Presently before the Court for decision is the Objection to Confirmation of Amended Chapter 13 Plan Dated March 5, 2013 filed by Wendy L. McKinney (“Wife”), the former spouse of the Debtor, at Document No. 72 (“Plan Objection”) and the related matter involving the Debtor’s Objection to Proof of Claim No. 3-3 of Wendy L. McKinn
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2008-06-13 · Published · cited 37× · 257 S.W.3d 130; 2008 Ky. App. LEXIS 187; 2008 WL 2388379
257 S.W.3d 130 (2008) Keith McKINNEY, Sr., Appellant v. Kimberly Lynn McKINNEY, Appellee. No. 2006-CA-002132-MR. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. June 13, 2008. *131 Katie Marie Brophy, Louisville, KY, for appellant. *132 Victoria Ann Ogden, Louisville, KY, for appellee. Before DIXO
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006-02-01 · Published · cited 5× · 226 S.W.3d 37; 94 Ark. App. 100
John B. Robbins, Judge. This is an appeal regarding a reduc-J tion in child support. Appellant Vicki McKinney and appel-lee Randall McKinney are the parents of a son who was ten years old when they divorced on October 3, 2003. Per their agreement, which was approved by the Washington County Circuit Court, Vicki retained custody, while Randall was granted visitation and was obligated to pay $1000 per month
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006-11-21 · Published · cited 0× · 205 S.W.3d 892; 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1731; 2006 WL 3372872
ORDER PER CURIAM. John McKinney appeals an Judgment of Contempt entered in the Circuit Court of Boone County for failure to pay child support arrearage in the amount of $16,092.06. This court finds the judgment of contempt is supported by substantial evidence. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005-10-05 · Published · cited 0× · 201 Or. App. 721; 120 P.3d 921
BREWER, C. J. Wife filed a notice of appeal from a judgment of dissolution of marriage. Husband moved to dismiss wife’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that wife failed to timely serve him with a copy of the notice of appeal. We conclude that wife did not timely serve husband, grant husband’s motion, and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We begin with a brief summary of the principle
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005-01-12 · Published · cited 22× · 820 N.E.2d 682; 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 10; 2005 WL 54601
820 N.E.2d 682 (2005) William A. McKINNEY, Appellant-Respondent, v. Katherine J. McKINNEY, Appellee-Petitioner. No. 52A05-0405-CV-288. Court of Appeals of Indiana. January 12, 2005. *684 Gary A. Cook, Peru, IN, for Appellant. OPINION BAILEY, Judge. Case Summary Appellant-Respondent
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001-05-04 · Published · cited 42× · 756 N.E.2d 694; 142 Ohio App. 3d 604
OPINION This is an appeal from an order of the court of common pleas, domestic relations division, which clarified the provisions of a prior decree of divorce that divided a retirement account and ordered a qualified domestic relations order consistent with the prior decree. Shirley G. McKinney, the husband, and Betty S. McKinney, the wife, were divorced on October 6, 1993. During the twenty-seven years the parties were married, Mr. McK
Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia · 2024-04-22 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA FILED April 22, 2024 TONI MCKINNEY, ASHLEY N. DEEM, DEPUTY CLERK Petitioner Below, Petitioner INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996-04-12 · Published · cited 0× · 81 Haw. 409; 917 P.2d 736; 1996 Haw. App. LEXIS 51
Affirmed
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996-05-23 · Published · cited 0× · 673 So. 2d 967; 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6227; 1996 WL 271609
PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Waskin v. Waskin, 484 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 494 So.2d 1153 (Fla.1986). BOOTH, WOLF and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995-05-02 · Published · cited 6× · 901 S.W.2d 227; 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 877; 1995 WL 254193
901 S.W.2d 227 (1995) Lloyd V. McKINNEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Diane McKINNEY, Respondent. No. 19363. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two. May 2, 1995. Motion for Rehearing or Transfer Denied May 24, 1995. Application to Transfer Denied July 25, 1995. *228 John S. Pratt,
McKinney v. Goinspublic domain
Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2025-01-31 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 109PA22-2 Filed 31 January 2025 DUSTIN MICHAEL MCKINNEY, GEORGE JERMEY MCKINNEY, and JAMES ROBERT TATE; and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, intervenor v. GARY SCOTT GOINS and THE GASTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) (2023) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 290 N.C. App. 403, 892 S.E.2d 460 (202
State v. McKinneypublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025-02-28 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 Ohio 680
[Cite as State v. McKinney, 2025-Ohio-680.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 24AP-409 v. : (C.P.C. No. 05CR-7130) Anthony L. McKinney, :
Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1994-10-14 · Published · cited 0× · 888 S.W.2d 332; 1994 Ky. App. LEXIS 124; 1994 WL 558365
SCHRODER, Judge: This appeal requires an interpretation of KRS 389A.030, the statutory right of partition for concurrent owners and a devise of estates and future interests in land. The testator, Wilburn J. McKinney, devised his 226 acre farm in Clark County to his wife, “[flor and during her natural life, and so long as she remains my widow ... or remarriage, whichever first occurs, ...” with a remainder
State v. McKinneypublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-09-17 · Published · cited 6× · 2024 Ohio 4642
[Cite as State v. McKinney, 2024-Ohio-4642.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAWRENCE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 23CA21 v.