Cases

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 10, 2024 Decided July 1, 2025 No. 24-5049 JOHN DOE, APPELLANT v. TRAVIS HILL, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ACTING CHAIRMAN OF THE FDIC AND FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, APPELLEES Appeal from the United States Di

OPINION OF THE COURT Norman C. Ryp, J. A. ISSUES “When” is it reasonable to schedule a make-up city civil service examination? “Now” or “whenever” at the unscheduled (since Oct. 31, 1981) “next regular examination” entitled Lieu*947tenant, F.D.? Is money or “time of the essence” under Administrative Code of the City of New York § 48

409 B.R. 543 (2009) In re 201 FOREST STREET LLC & 219 Forest Street LLC, Debtors. 201 Forest Street LLC, 201 Forest Street Realty Trust, 219 Forest Street LLC, & 219 Forest Street Realty Trust, Plaintiffs, v. LBM Financial LLC & Marcello Mallegni, Defendants. Nos. 07-42296-JBR, 07-41768-JBR. Adversary No. 07-4097. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts, Central Division.</

14 So.3d 311 (2008) J. Robert WOOLEY, As Commissioner of Insurance for the State of Louisiana v. Thomas S. LUCKSINGER, Michael D. Nadler, Stephen J. Nazarenus, Scott Westbrook, Michael K. Jhin, William F. Galtney, John P. Mudd, Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc., Executive Risk Management Associates, Executive Risk Specialty Insurance Co., Executive Liability Underwriters and Greenwich Insurance Co., AmCareco, Inc., AmCare Management, Inc. J. Rob

DURHAM, Justice (concurring and dissenting): In view of the authorities and rationale presented by the majority opinion, I concur that an action based on wrongful pregnancy is a valid cause of action in this state. However, I do not agree with the majority’s limitation on recoverable damages. Instead, I would hold that damages should be assessed under a “benefits rule” analysi

130 F.Supp.2d 161 (2001) HARVARD APPARATUS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Barry COWEN, d/b/a Yale Apparatus, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 98-11124-MBB. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 23, 2001. *162 *163 Franklin H. Levy, Abrams, Roberts, Klickstein & Levy, Boston, MA, for Harvard A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Data Intensity LLC v. Case No. 21-cv-781-PB Opinion No. 2024 DNH 022 Nathan Spero, et al. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Two brothers, Josh and Nate Spero, were working for Data Intensity, LLC when they formed Freedom Tech, LLC as a competing business. In this action, Data Intensity al

746 N.E.2d 1242 (2001) 321 Ill. App.3d 269 254 Ill.Dec. 194 Michael E. AVERY et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 5-99-0830. Appellate Court of Illinois, Fifth District. April 5, 2001.

825 S.W.2d 295 (1992) Karen S. GIRDLEY and Jeffrey E. Girdley Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Stephen H. COATS, D.O., and Stephen H. Coats, Inc., Defendants-Respondents. No. 74029. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. February 25, 1992. David W. Ansley, Michael P. Mergen, James Condry, Springfield, for plaintiffs-appellants. William C. Love, Kent O. Hyde, Springfiel

(text box: 1) NO. 5-99-0830 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT ____________________________________________________________________________________________ MICHAEL E. AVERY et al. , on Behalf of ) Appeal from the

192 F.Supp.2d 577 (2001) Kent ACOSTA, et al, v. MASTER MAINTENANCE, et al. Debra Adams, et al, v. Georgia Gulf Corporation, et al. Nos. Civ. A. 98-1065-A-M2, Civ. A. 98-1066-A-M2. United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana. December 18, 2001. *578 *579 REPORT & RECO

343 S.E.2d 301 (1986) Donald MILLER, M.D. v. Laura JOHNSON. FUNG MAI HWANG v. Gerald J. RUTH, M.D., et al. Record Nos. 822020, 841536. Supreme Court of Virginia. April 25, 1986. *302 Robert A. Rapaport (H.H. Hunter Clarke, Harlan, Knight, Dudley & Pincus, Norfolk, on briefs), for appellant Miller. William L

559 S.W.2d 235 (1977) Ernest Horton BOLIN, Carl G. Bolin, Sven Amos Bolin and Stanley L. Morris, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Chester ANDERS, Defendant-Appellant, Westport Bank and Edward L. Fitzgerald, Administrator Pendente Lite of the Estate of Carl A. Olson, Respondents. No. KCD 28681. Missouri Court of Appeals, Kansas City District. October 31, 1977. Mot

695 F.Supp. 1397 (1988) Abraham GARFINKEL, Robert B. Rosenberg, David S. Levy, Richard Goodwin, and Christine Rappoport, Plaintiffs, v. MEMORY METALS, INC., Neil E. Rogen, L. McDonald Schetsky, and Stephen M. Fisher Defendants. Civ. No. B-86-488 (WWE). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 19, 1988. *1398 Stanle

328 N.W.2d 181 (1982) 213 Neb. 76 STATE of Nebraska, Appellee, v. Clinton W. JOHN, Appellant. No. 82-066. Supreme Court of Nebraska. December 10, 1982. *182 Joseph Ginsburg of Ginsburg, Rosenberg, Ginsburg, Cathcart, Curry & Gordon, Lincoin, *183 and Baldwin & M

66 F.Supp.2d 937 (1999) RICH PRODUCTS CORP., Plaintiff, v. KEMUTEC, INC., Defendant. No. 95-C-968. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. August 30, 1999. *938 *939 *940 *941 *942

505 U.S. 833 (1992) PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA et al. v. CASEY, GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al. No. 91-744. United States Supreme Court. Argued April 22, 1992. Decided June 29, 1992.[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT *834

381 A.2d 1080 (1977) MECHANIC FALLS WATER COMPANY v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. CARIBOU WATER WORKS CORPORATION v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. ELLSWORTH WATER COMPANY v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. WASHBURN WATER COMPANY v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. FORT KENT WATER COMPANY v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Dec

279 F.Supp. 316 (1967) ERIE-LACKAWANNA RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Defendants. The Delaware and Hudson Railroad Corporation, Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad Company, Milton J. Shapp, City of Scranton, Borough of Freedom, and Boston and Maine R. R. Co., Intervening Plaintiffs, Pennsylvania Railroad Company, New York Central Railroad Company, and Richard Joyce Smith an

134 F.2d 287 (1943) HOPE NATURAL GAS CO. v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION et al. No. 4979. Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. February 16, 1943. Writ of Certiorari Granted May 17, 1943. *288 *289 *290 *291