Cases

Affirmed Anderson

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

PER CURIAM: This matter arisés from the multidistrict litigation (“MDL”), In re FEMA Trailer Formaldehyde Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 07-1873. Although the MDL included plaintiffs from Alabama, Mississippi, Texas, and Louisiana, this appeal involves only the Louisiana plaintiffs (hereinafter “plaintiffs”). “All actions centralized in the MDL share factual questions relating to allegations that the [Emerge

REYNA, Circuit Judge, concurring. I agree with the majority that Mr. McGuire has not demonstrated that he had a cognizable property interest to support his takings claim, and that the Court of Federal Claims’ judgment should be affirmed. I write separately to express my disagreement with the majority’s decision to disregard the Ninth Circuit’s holding that this case was ripe on the grounds that “it was n

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

OPINION AND ORDER FUTEY, Judge. Jerry McGuire brought this inverse condemnation claim nine years ago in a federal bankruptcy proceeding in district court in Arizona. He alleges that the government took his leased property by removing a bridge he used to access the northern portion of the property. He thus demands more than $2 million in compensation. After a trial and appeal, the United States Cou

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JERRY MCGUIRE,  No. 06-15812 Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  D.C. No. CV-05-02694-JAT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OPINION Defendant-Appellee. 

550 F.3d 903 (2008) Jerry McGUIRE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 06-15812. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 15, 2008. Filed December 24, 2008. *906 Robert M. Cook; Phoenix, AZ; David A. Domina and James F. Cann, Omaha, NE, for

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F I L E D FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , MAY 04 C|erk, U.S. District and John Patrick McGuire, ) BankrupfCV courts Plaintiff, § v. § Civil Action No.: United States District Court et al., § Defendants. § l ii MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiff has filed an application to proceed without prepayment of fees and a pro se complaint. The application will be granted and the complaint will be dismissed. The complaint, which names two federal courts, numerous federal j

544 U.S. 946 McGUIREv.UNITED STATES. No. 04-8709. Supreme Court of United States. March 28, 2005. 1 C. A. 1st Cir. Reported below: 389 F.3d 225. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases rem

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

CCA 201000611. Appellant’s motion to extend time to file a petition for reconsideration is granted to October 10, 2013.

CCA 201000611. Appellant’s petition for reconsideration of this Court’s Order of April 17, 2013, is denied.

SYKES, Circuit Judge. Patrick McGuire pleaded guilty to a single count of interfering with commerce by threat or violence. At sentencing the district court classified McGuire as a career offender under § 4Bl.l(a) of the Sentencing Guidelines, which increases the offense level if the defendant has two prior felony convictions for a “crime of violence.” U.S.S.G. § 4Bl.l(a) (2014). “Crime of violence” is defined in § 4B1.2 and

CCA 201000611. On further consideration of the granted issue, 72 M.J. 255 (C.A.A.F. 2013), and in view of United States v. Tunstall, 72 M.J. 191 (C.A.A.F. 2013), and United States v. Goings, 72 M.J. 202 (C.A.A.F. 2013), it is ordered that, the decision of the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals is affirmed.

KANNE, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant Sandra McGuire entered into a plea agreement that contained a provision waiving her appellate rights. After the district court accepted her guilty plea, but before McGuire was sentenced, she filed a motion to withdraw her plea. The district court denied the motion, and McGuire appeals that denial. We dismiss the appeal, because we conclude