Cases

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 2, 2005 Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 2, 2005. In The Fourteen

BARNES, Presiding Judge. Sanyo Walter McGee appeals his conviction for trafficking in cocaine and his sentence of life imprisonment. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction, maintains that *662the trial court made several errors in its charge and recharge to the jury, and contends that the trial court erred in sentencing him to life in

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of April 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."

PER CURIAM: The issue in this appeal is whether the extended charge that Bank of America assesses on its deposit accounts constitutes “interest” for purposes of the National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 85-86. The plaintiffs concede that, under our decision in Video Trax, Inc. v. Nationsbank, N.A., 205 F.3d 1358 (11th Cir. 2000), the extended charge is not interest. The plaintiffs brought this appeal because they want to

236 S.W.3d 162 (2007) Patrick McGEE v. Tommy JACOBS, et al. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville. Assigned On Briefs March 30, 2007. May 18, 2007. Order on Denial of Rehearing June 8, 2007. Application for Permission to Appeal Denied September 24, 2007. *163 G. Kline Preston, IV, Nashville

*********** The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Homick and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has shown good ground to reconsider the evidence. Accordingly, the Full Commission REVERSES the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner and enters the following Opinion and Award.

723 F.Supp.2d 161 (2010) Samuel McGEE, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-2310 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 15, 2010. *163 E. Scott Frison, Jr., The Law Firm of E. Scott Frison, Jr., Sol Z. Rosen, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Darrell Chambers, Melvin W. B

MEMORANDUM OPINION SAVAGE, District Judge. In this securities fraud action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) based upon a misappropriation theory of liability under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 19341 and SEC Rule 10b-5,2 defendants Timothy McGee, Michael Zirinsky and Robert Zirinsky have moved to dismiss

646 F.Supp.2d 115 (2009) Samuel McGEE, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. Civil Action No. 07-2310(RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 21, 2009. *116 E. Scott Frison, Jr., The Law Firm of E. Scott Frison, Jr., Sol Z. Rosen, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff. Darrell Chambers, District o

ORDER PER CURIAM. Justin McGee (“Defendant”) appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree robbery. He was acquitted of the corresponding charge of armed criminal action. He argues that the trial court erred in “accepting the jury’s guilty verdict” because a conviction for first-degree robbery is inconsistent with an acquittal for armed criminal action arising

10/14/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs July 7, 2021 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CALVIN SCOTT Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County Nos. 99-03993, 99-03994, 99-03995, 99-03996, 99-03997 W. Mark Ward, Judge

Memorandum Opinion and Order Honorable Thomas M. Durkin, United States District Judge Plaintiff-Relator Michael McGee (“McGee”) brings this qwi tam action on behalf of the United States and the State of Illinois. R. 1. McGee alleges that IBM, Johnson Controls Incorporated *650(“JCI”), Wireless Information Technologies Enterprise (“WIT”), T

124 S.W.3d 253 (2003) Jonathan Clifton McGEE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, State. Nos. 2-02-471-CR, 2-02-472-CR, 2-02-473-CR, 2-02-474-CR, 2-02-475-CR, 2-02-476-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. November 6, 2003. Bill Lane, Scott Brown, Fort Worth, for Appellant. Tim Curry, Criminal Dist. Atty., Charles M. Mallin, Helena F. Faulkner, Ben Leonard

02/26/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 10, 2024 Session LAGINA SCOTT v. SHELBY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-19-0492 Jim Kyle, Chancellor ___________________________________

PER CURIAM. Michael H. McGee appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McGee v. Reno, No. CA-00-452-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Jan. 5 & Feb. 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con

ORDER CRAVEN, United States Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and (3) and the Amended Order for the Adoption of Local Rules for Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges, Defendant’s Motion for Separate Trials (Docket Entry #376), Plaintiffs’ Motion to Name Trial Groups (Docket Entry # 379), Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order to Set N

08/15/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE STATE OF TENNESSEE v. QUINCY D. SCOTT Appeal from the Criminal Court for Bradley County No. 2006-CR-124 Andrew M. Freiberg, Judge ___________________________________ No. E2018-02271-CCA-R3-CD

565 F.3d 753 (2009) M.D. MARK, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. KERR-McGEE CORPORATION; Oryx Energy Company, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Nos. 08-1040, 08-1047, 08-1236. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. May 11, 2009. *755 Marie R. Yeates of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., Houston, TX, (Penelope E.

17 P.3d 272 (2000) 135 Idaho 328 Richard McGEE, Claimant-Appellant, v. J.D. LUMBER, Employer and Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation, Surety, Defendants-Respondents. No. 25620. Supreme Court of Idaho, Coeur d'Alene, September 2000 Term. December 22, 2000. Rehearing Denied January 12, 2001. *2

Opinion by JUDGE HAWTHORNE ¶ 1 This case concerns the propriety of fees imposed by the Town of Milliken on active oil and gas wells for site safety and security inspections conducted by the Town's police department. We conclude that the plain language of section 34-60-106(15), C.R.S.2012, which is part of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act, prohibits the Town from imposing such fees. Accordingly, we affirm the summary judgment entered