Cases

WESLEY, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, Defendants contend that the district court erred in denying their motions for judgment on the pleadings for immunity under New York state law, and their motions for summary judgment for immunity under federal law. We do not have jurisdiction over the state law immunity claims, as the immunity is from liability, not suit. We do have jurisdiction over the federal claims, and hold that the

Carpinello, J. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Canfield, J.), entered May 30, 2001 in Rensselaer County, which, inter alia, declared a lease extension valid and enforceable. In 1980, defendant’s City Council enacted an ordinance authorizing the City Manager to enter into a 20-year lease of restaurant facilities located on defendant’s municipal golf course with plaintiffs predecessor in interest. In 199

Saxe, J. (dissenting in part.) This Court has today expanded the legal duty of physicians beyond the boundaries established by recent Court of Appeals’ pronouncements that have strictly limited the parameters of tort responsibility where a defendant has no direct, legally defined relationship with the plaintiff. While well intentioned and well presented, the majority’s determination could have a detrimental impact on the practice o

OPINION OF THE COURT Cozier, J. The issue raised on this appeal is whether the plaintiffs supplemental summons and complaint comply with CPLR 1003 and 3025 (b). For the reasons stated herein, we find that the supplemental summons and complaint do not comply with CPLR 1003 and 3025 (b) to the extent that they were served without leave of court and in the absence of a stipulation containing the signature of

OAKES, Senior Circuit Judge: I. INTRODUCTION The City of New York (City) contracted with the Perini Corporation (Perini) to reconstruct the Pulaski Bridge. Soon after Perini commenced work in September 1991, the City ordered Perini to stop work because the necessary engineering and construction support services were not yet in place. Perini was dire

Peters, J. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Mugglin, J.), entered November 29, 1995 in Otsego County, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to annul a determination of respondents terminating petitioner’s disability benefits payable under General Municipal Law § 207-a. Petitioner, a paid firefighter employed by the City of Oneonta in Otsego County, suffe

OPINION OF THE COURT Roger D. McDonough, J. Petitioner/plaintiff (Global) seeks an order and judgment awarding the following relief: (1) compelling respondents/defendants to act upon Global’s title v air permit modification application (title V application) within 14 days by either: (a) preparing a proposed permit, or (b) denying the permit; (2) annulling respondents’ purported rescission of the notice of co

21-33 Barnes v. City of New York 1 2 In the 3 United States Court of Appeals 4 For the Second Circuit 5 6 7 August Term, 2021 8 9 No. 21-33 10 11 TOMMY BARNES, 12 13 Plaintiff-Appellant, 14 15

20-2201 Kee v. City of New York United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit _____________________________________ August Term 2020 (Argued: April 30, 2021 Decided: August 30, 2021) No. 20-2201-cv _____________________________________

19-2726-cv Ashley v. City of New York 1 IN THE 2 United States Court of Appeals 3 For the Second Circuit 4 ________ 5 AUGUST TERM, 2020 6 7 ARGUED: SEPTEMBER 23, 2020 8 DECIDED: MARCH 26, 2021 9 10 No. 19-2726-CV

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PARTIAL JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFFS AND DISMISSING REMAINDER OF COMPLAINT ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, District Judge: In 1968, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (“the Port Authority”) leased a parcel of land at Washington and Barclay Streets in lower Manhattan for fifty years to the Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (“Con Edison”). The Port Authority built

934 F.Supp. 107 (1996) Carmella GOOD, Administratrix of the Estate of John Anthony Good, Jr., deceased, and Carmella Good, individually, Plaintiffs, v. The PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL IN the CITY OF NEW YORK, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, Babies Hospital, Robyn J. Barst, M.D., Craig Smith, M.D., Lynne Quittell, M.D., and John Doe I through John Doe XXX, Defendants. No. 93 Civ. 3794 (JGK). United Stat

799 F.Supp. 1308 (1992) UNITED STATES of America and The State Of New York, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF NEW YORK and New York City Department of Environmental Protection, Defendants. Carolyn MALONEY, Individually, and as a member of the New York City Counsel, and Fernando Ferrer, Individually, and as the Bronx Borough President, Petitioners, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, New York City Department of Environmental Protection, and Albert F. Appleton,

Matter of People of the State of New York v Schofield (2021 NY Slip Op 04785) Matter of People of the State of New York v Schofield 2021 NY Slip Op 04785 Decided on August 26, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department P

Tom, J. (dissenting). At issue on this appeal is the acquisition of approximately 17 acres in the Manhattanville area of West Harlem by Columbia University for the development of its campus. In addition to up to 16 new buildings, a multi-level below-grade facility and the adaptive reuse of an existing build*33ing, the project would create approximately two acres of publicly ac

15 N.Y.3d 235 (2010) 933 N.E.2d 721 907 N.Y.S.2d 122 In the Matter of PARMINDER KAUR et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Doing Business as EMPIRE STATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellant. In the Matter of TUCK-IT-AWAY, INC., et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Doing Business as EMPIRE STATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appel

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered February 19, 1997, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondents’ determination dated January 3, 1996, dismissing petitioner from his position as a police officer with the New York City Police Department, unanimously affirmed, without costs. In light of petitioner’s admissions at his disciplinary hearing t

Case: 19-2211 Document: 104 Page: 1 Filed: 06/15/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BRUCE R. TAYLOR, Claimant-Appellant v. DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETER- ANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee ______________________ 2019-2211 ______________________ A

Case: 19-2211 Document: 104 Page: 1 Filed: 06/15/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BRUCE R. TAYLOR, Claimant-Appellant v. DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETER- ANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee ______________________ 2019-2211 ______________________ A

MESKILL, Circuit Judge: In this appeal we must decide whether a company’s legitimate assignment of its interest in a joint venture construction project eliminates that company’s citizenship from consideration in determining whether diversity jurisdiction exists in a later suit by the joint venture for sums allegedly owed for work on the project. Schiavone C