Cases

In connection with a plea agreement, defendant signed a 12-page document in which, among other things, he agreed to plead guilty to criminal possession of marihuana in the second degree as set forth in one count of a superior court information, and purportedly waived the right to appeal. One paragraph of the document stated that if defendant was arrested before sentencing, County Court would not be bound by the sentencing agreement and could sentence him

People v Stabb (2022 NY Slip Op 04666) People v Stabb 2022 NY Slip Op 04666 Decided on July 21, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

People v Stabb (2022 NY Slip Op 04666) People v Stabb 2022 NY Slip Op 04666 Decided on July 21, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: June 25, 2015 106899 ________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MARTIN O. POPE JR., Appellant. ________________________________ Calendar Date: April 27, 2015 Be

Kavanagh, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Giardino, J), rendered June 22, 2007, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of attempted murder in the second degree (two counts), assault in the first degree (two counts) and reckless endangerment in the first degree (10 counts). In full satisfaction of a 16-count indictment, defendant

Spain, J. (concurring). I write separately to explain our view that the record on appeal does not afford a sufficient basis upon which to conclude that defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal was knowing, intelligent or voluntary. While the requirement that defendant waive his right to appeal was genetically recited up front as a term of the plea agreement and defendant signed a written waiver in open court, nothing on “the

- 989 - Nebraska A dvance Sheets 291 Nebraska R eports STATE v. DYE Cite as 291 Neb. 989 State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Brandon Dye, appellant. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed October 23, 2015. No. S-14-792. 1. Waiver: Appeal and Error. The validity of an appeal w

OPINION OF THE COURT NeMoyer, J. When an employee prevails on a wage nonpayment claim under article 6 of the Labor Law, “the court shall allow such employee to recover ... all reasonable attorney’s fees” (§ 198 [1-a]). We hold that a wage claimant may, in certain circumstances, validly waive their statutory right to attor

Schiferle v Capital Fence Co., Inc. (2017 NY Slip Op 07059) Schiferle v Capital Fence Co., Inc. 2017 NY Slip Op 07059 Decided on October 6, 2017 Appellate Division, Fourth Department NeMoyer, J.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 529 KA 11-01156 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GENNA A. TURNER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. CHARLES T. NOCE, CONFLICT DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JOSEPH D. WALDORF OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTOR

Mercure, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Keegan, J.), rendered November 4, 1991, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of robbery in the first degree. Defendant entered into a plea bargain under the terms of which he entered a plea of guilty to a single count of robbery in the first degree in satisfaction of an eight-count indictment, was sentenced as a second

587 N.E.2d 1149 (1992) 225 Ill. App.3d 433 167 Ill.Dec. 534 TIMBERLINE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Timothy TOWNE, d/b/a Towne Development et al., Defendants-Appellees David Horwitz et al., Defendants. No. 2-91-0614. Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District. February 6, 1992. Rehearing Denied March 25, 1

356 Mass. 560 (1969) 254 N.E.2d 250 ROBERT F. MAXWELL & another vs. EDWARD F. RATCLIFFE & others. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Middlesex. December 3, 1969. December 31, 1969. Present: SPALDING, CUTTER, KIRK, SPIEGEL, & QUIRICO, JJ. Daniel J. Johnedis for the plaintiffs. CUTTER, J. In this ac