Cases

PER CURIAM. Richard McCoy appeals an order that denied his motion to vacate a judgment of conviction of first-degree murder and a' sentence of death under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY A jury convicted McCoy of the first-degree murder of Shervie Ann Elliott and recommended the death penalty by

ORDER BRIAN J. DAVIS, District Judge. I. STATUS Petitioner Shkelqim Fana filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Petition) (Doc. 1) under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He is represented by counsel in this proceeding. The Petition challenges a 2008 state court (Duval County) conviction for attempted second degree murder with a weapon.1 Id. at 1.

791 F.2d 1573 5 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1152, 32 Ed. Law Rep. 915 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.STATE OF ARKANSAS; Arkansas Department of Education, Dr.Don R. Roberts, Director; Wayne Hartsfield, Chairman; JimDupree; T.C. Cogbill, Jr.; Rabie Rhodes; Dr. John W.Cole; Harry A. Haines; Rev. Emery Washington; Jack E.Meadows; and Dr. Ellis Gardner, Appellants,Nemo Vista School District and

FILED 17-0637 12/21/2017 3:18 PM tex-21442581 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK NO.

372 F.2d 836 UNITED STATES of America and Linda Stout, by her father andnext friend, Blevin Stout, Appellants,v.JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al., Appellees.UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,v.The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF FAIRFIELD et al., Appellees.UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,v.The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF BESSEMER et al., Appellees.UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,

WISDOM, Circuit Judge: Once again the Court is called upon to review school desegregation plans to determine whether the plans meet constitutional standards. The distinctive feature of these cases, consolidated on appeal, is that they also require us to reexamine school desgregation standards in the light of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Guidelines of the United States Office of Education, Department of Health, Educat

ORDER TIMOTHY J. CORRIGAN, United States District Judge Petitioner, Gregory Green, was charged in state court with escape when he failed to return from work release. The State * offered him a plea deal of twelve months in jail consecutive to his current sentence. Due to his counsel’s failure to communicate with him and the State regarding this plea deal, the favorable plea

HULL, Circuit Judge: William Thaddeus Turner appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging his death sentence. Turner argues that his attorneys rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to introduce certain mitigating evidence during the penalty phase of his trial and that his death sentence violates his constitutional right to a

CORRIGAN, J. **359 *676 *578 On appeal we affirmed petitioner's convictions and death penalty judg

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _______________ January 31, 2003 T

853 F.Supp. 1492 (1994) Allen Lee DAVIS, Petitioner, v. Harry K. SINGLETARY, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent. No. 92-251-Civ-J-20. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. May 25, 1994. *1493 *1494 *1495

Proceedings (In Chambers): ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) [41] Present: The Honorable MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Class Action Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (the “Motion”). (Docket No. 41). The Court has read and cons

452 F.Supp.2d 1203 (2006) William Greg THOMAS, Petitioner, v. James R. McDONOUGH, et al., Respondents. Floyd Damren, Petitioner, v. James R. McDonough, et al., Respondents. Nos. 3:03-cv-237-J--32, 3:03-cv-397-J-32. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. September 25, 2006. *1204

734 F.Supp.2d 814 (2010) Percy GREEN, II, Plaintiff, v. State of MISSOURI, et al., Defendants. No. 4:06CV1667RWS. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. August 17, 2010. *822 Robert J. Reinhold, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff. Robert J. Isaacson, Attorney General of Missouri, St. Louis, MO, for Paul N

ACCEPTED 03-15-00280-CV 6142048 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. This is a school desegregation case in the remedial stage of proceedings. The State of Arkansas and the Arkansas Department of Education (hereinafter sometimes collectively referred to as “the State”) appeal from a final judgment of the District Court requiring the State to finance the costs of desegregating the schools in Conway County, Arkansas. The State contends that the District Court committed

ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

566 S.W.2d 902 (1978) O. P. CARRILLO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 57329. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Panel No. 2. May 10, 1978. Rehearing Denied June 28, 1978. *905 Randy Schaffer, Houston, for appellant. Oscar McInnis, Dist. Atty., Edinburg, F. A. Cerda, Dist. Atty., Hebbronvil

*883BELL, COLEMAN, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, MORGAN, CLARK, INGRAHAM, and RONEY, Circuit Judges (specially concurring): We concur in the result reached in the opinion prepared by Judge Wisdom to the extent of reversing and remanding the cause to the district court with direction that the dual school system and