Cases

ORDER HERMAN J. WEBER, District Judge. This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Motion to Dismiss Amended Third-Party Complaint (doc. no. 20) and the memoranda filed relating thereto. A hearing on the Motion to Dismiss was held at which all parties were heard, including plaintiff whose opposition to the inclusion of the third-party defendant in this suit has not been formally filed in memorandum fo

MANSFIELD, Justice. This case presents the question whether a subcontractor that properly performs electrical work on a jobsite, then locks up the work and transfers control to the property owner, owes a duty of care to an employee of the owner electrocuted six days later when the owner fails to deener-gize the work site in contravention of various warnings and regulations. We conclude that no such duty is owed under the circu

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND. GARLAND, Circuit Judge: On September 22,1998, defendant Joann McCoy was found guilty of making a false statement for the purpose of influencing a federally insured bank, making a false statement for the purpose of influencing the Small Business Administration (SBA), and committing perjury at a 1995 ba

James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, filed March 23, 2018 (Doc. 27)("MTD"). The Court held a hearing on August 10, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether the applicable statutes of limitations bar Plaintiff Janice Nowell's claims against Defendants Medtronic Inc., Covidien PLC, Covidien LP, and Medtronic PLC for negligence, strict

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AQUA PRODUCTS, INC., Appellant v. JOSEPH MATAL, PERFORMING THE FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________ 2015-1177 _______________

ROY B. DALTON JR., United States District Judge Before the Court are Plaintiff's partial motion for summary judgment (Doc. 162) and Defendant Resurrection Life THC, Inc.'s ("RLTHC ") motion for summary judgment (Doc. 164). These cross-motions for summary judgment have been fully briefed (See Docs. 193-96.) For the following reasons, the Court grants RLTHC's motion for summary judgment and denies Plaintiff's

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARTHA VÁZQUEZ, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss First *1166Amended Complaint [Doc. 6]. The Court, having considered the motion, briefs, relevant law and being otherwise fully informed, finds that the Motion is well-taken in part and will be GRANTED IN PA

325 N.E.2d 844 (1975) RIETH-RILEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Appellant (Defendant below), v. Kenneth E. McCarrell, Appellee (Plaintiff below). No. 1-474A70. Court of Appeals of Indiana, First District. April 15, 1975. Rehearing Denied May 15, 1975. *846 R. Stanley Lawton, William L. Skees, Jr., Indianapolis, Joh

OPINION AND ORDER WHEELER, Judge. Plaintiff, Martin Construction, Inc. (“Martin”) from Gladstone, North Dakota brought the present action under the Contract Disputes Act (“CDA”), 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (2006) (current version at 41 U.S.C. §§ 7101-7109). Martin contracted with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“the Corps”) on August 30, 2007 to construct a marina in Garrison, North Dakota.

635 F.3d 422 (2011) TRISHAN AIR, INC.; Kerry Acquisitions, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY; Starr Aviation Agency, Inc.; The Buckner Company, Inc.; David Wittwer; Arlington/Roe & Company, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 09-55317. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 11, 2010. Filed February 16, 20

DONALDSON, Judge. Cool Temp, Inc. (“Cool Temp”), appeals from a summary judgment entered by the Jefferson Circuit Court, Bessemer Division (“the trial court”), holding that Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (“PNMCIC”) was not obligated under a policy of insurance to defend Cool Temp in an action in tort and contract brought against Cool Temp by Gregory L. *450

*34¶1 Pacific County Public Utility District No. 2 (hereinafter District) permitted Comcast of Washington IV, Inc., CenturyLink of Washington, Inc.,1 and Falcon Community Ventures I, LP, d/b/a Charter Communications (collectively Companies), to attach their communications equipment to its utility poles pursuant to agreements with the Companies. However, at the beginning o

29 Cal.Rptr.3d 641 (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 52 Tawnya D. RUIZ, as Personal Representative, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HERMAN WEISSKER, INC., Defendant and Respondent. No. D044733. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One. June 9, 2005. Rehearing Denied July 7, 2005. Review Denied August 24, 2005. <

ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2 OF DIVISION ONE PACIFIC COUNTY, a Washington Corporation, No. 70625-0-1 Respondent, PUBLISHED OPINION v. COMCAST OF WASHINGTON IV, INC., a Washington corporation; CENTURYTEL OF WASHINGTON, INC., a Washington corporation; and FALCON COMMUNITY VENTURES

POSNER, Circuit Judge. Williams, the manufacturer of Mortal Kombat and other video games, brought suit for fraud and related misconduct, federal and state (Illinois law governs the state law claims), against two of its components suppliers, Arrow and Milgray. (National Union, Williams’s insurer, joined as a plaintiff, but need not be discussed separately.) Williams charges the suppliers with, among other things, havin

406 F.Supp.2d 175 (2005) VICTOR G. REILING ASSOCIATES AND DESIGN INNOVATION, INC., Plaintiffs, v. FISHER-PRICE, INC., Defendant. No. 3:03 CV 222(JBA). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. December 15, 2005. *176 *177 Edmund J. Ferdinand, III, Jessica Lee Elliott, Russell D. Dize, Grim

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER VRATIL, District Judge. Plaintiffs have filed suit against Torch-mark Corporation (“Torchmark”) and Ronald K. Richey, Harold T. McCormick and Louis T. Hagopian. Torchmark is the former corporate parent of Waddell & Reed, Inc. The individual defendants are former common directors of Torchmark and Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. Plaintiffs seek to recover under the Rac

149 F.Supp.2d 730 (1999) Sheri Sawyer MADISON, Plaintiff, v. IBP, INC., Defendant; United States of America, Intervenor. No. Civ. 4-96-CV-20712. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. December 28, 1999. *731 *732 *733

217 F.Supp.2d 529 (2002) In re LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. 00-cv-621 (JAP). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 26, 2002. *530 *531 *532 *533 *534 David