Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “McCormick v. Goebel”
Goebel v. Hopkinspublic domain
[Cite as Goebel v. Hopkins, 2024-Ohio-194.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY CHARLES E. GOEBEL, et al., : CASE NO. CA2023-06-044 Appellants, : OPINION
Goebel v. City of Cedar Rapidspublic domain
McCORMICK, Justice. We granted this interlocutory appeal to decide whether persons who receive benefits under Code chapter 411 are barred from maintaining a tort action against the city based on the same injury. Chapter 411 provides comprehensive disability and pension benefits for firemen and policemen under civil service as well as accidental death benefits for their beneficiaries. Plaintiffs are the estate representatives,
McCormick v. Brevigpublic domain
¶ 1 This case involves a protracted dispute between a brother and sister concerning their respective interests in a ranching partnership that is before the Court a second time. The litigation began in 1995 when Joan McCormick ("Joan") brought this action against her brother, Clark Brevig ("Clark"), and their Partnership, Brevig Land Live and Lumber (hereinafter, "the Partnership"), seeking a Partnership accounting and dissolution. Clark counterclaimed for fraud, deceit, negligent misr
McCormick v. Zander Reum Co.public domain
25 Ill.2d 241 (1962) 184 N.E.2d 882 ROBERT H. McCORMICK, Trustee, Appellant, v. ZANDER REUM COMPANY, Appellee. No. 36728. Supreme Court of Illinois. Opinion filed May 25, 1962. Rehearing denied September 27, 1962. *242 RALPH T. CARROLL, of Chicago, for appellant. CLARE J. MURPHY AND
Perry v. Johnstonpublic domain
641 F.3d 953 (2011) Shane PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert JOHNSTON, Rev., Defendant, Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis, Defendant-Appellant. William Goebel, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Johnston, Rev., Defendant, Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis, Defendant-Appellant. Matthew McCormick, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Johnston, Rev., Defendant, Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis, Defendant-Appellant.
Feldhahn v. R.K.B. Quality Corp.public domain
356 N.W.2d 226 (1984) Leroy A. FELDHAHN and Bernadine V. Feldhahn, Appellants, v. R.K.B. QUALITY CORP., Appellee. No. 83-435. Supreme Court of Iowa. October 17, 1984. Rehearing Denied November 8, 1984. *227 Jack E. Dusthimer of Goebel & Koury, Davenport, for appellants. John D. Stonebraker of McDonald,
Sanchez v. Bay General Hospitalpublic domain
116 Cal.App.3d 776 (1981) 172 Cal. Rptr. 342 IRMA SANCHEZ, a Minor, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BAY GENERAL HOSPITAL, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. 18823. Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One. February 25, 1981. *782 COUNSEL Goebel & Monaghan, Brian D. Mo
Shinn v. Columbuspublic domain
[Cite as Shinn v. Columbus, 2025-Ohio-183.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Linda Shinn et al., : Plaintiffs-Appellees, : Donald Cade, : No. 24AP-181 (C.P.C. No. 22CV-1589) Plaintiff-Appellant, :
John Nesse v. Green Nature-Cycle, LLCpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-2365 ___________________________ John Nesse, as Trustees of the Minnesota Laborers Health and Welfare Fund and as Trustees of the Minnesota Laborers Pension Fund; Tim Mackey, as Trustees of the Minnesota Laborers Health and Welfare Fund, as Trustees of the Minnesota Laborers Pensi
State v. Martinezpublic domain
FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON IN CLERK’S OFFICE NOVEMBER 19, 2020 SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON NOVEMBER 19, 2020 SUSAN L. CARLSON
United States v. McFaddenpublic domain
Appellate Case: 23-1089 Document: 010111103175 Date Filed: 08/30/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH August 30, 2024 UNITED STATES COURT O
Zuzula v. ABB POWER T & D CO., INC.public domain
267 F.Supp.2d 703 (2003) Kim ZUZULA, Personal Representative of the Estate of Steven Zuzula, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. ABB POWER T & D COMPANY, INC., Defendant. No. 01-10082-BC. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Northern Division. June 3, 2003. *705 Paul M. Purcell, Purcell, Tunison, Karl J. Weyand, Jr., Grimaldi, Pe
State v. Arredondopublic domain
(:'..... . SUSAN L. CARLSON SUPREME COURT CLERK IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) Respondent, ) ) No. 92389-2 V. ) ) FABIAN ARREDONDO, ) E
State v. Vazquezpublic domain
NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur
People v. Ziglarpublic domain
45 P.3d 1266 (2002) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner. v. Daryl C. ZIGLAR, Respondent. No. 01SC193. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. March 25, 2002. Ken Salazar, Attorney General, Laurie A. Booras, First Assistant Attorney General, Denver, CO, Attorneys for Petitioner. David S. Kaplan, Colorado State Public Defender, Nancy J. Lichtenstein, De
Villegas v. Alewelt, Inc.public domain
524 F.Supp.2d 1138 (2005) Dora L. VILLEGAS as the Administrator of the Estate of Cesar Villegas, and Dora L. Villegas, Individually, Plaintiff, v. ALEWELT, INC. and Pork-N-More Inc., and Joe and Sandy Nelson, Defendants. No. 4:03-CV-30433. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. May 4, 2005. *1139 Gary G. Matts
Pioneer Centres Holding Co. Employee Stock Ownership Plan & Trust v. Alerus Financial, N.A.public domain
McHUGH, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The Pioneer Centres Holding Company Employee Stock Ownership Plan and *1327Trust (the “Plan” or “ESOP”) and its trustees sued Alerus Financial, N.A. (Alerus) for breach of fiduciary duty in connection with the failure of a proposed employee stock purchase. The district court granted summary judgment to Ale
State v. Brownpublic domain
Madsen, J. (concurring in part, dissenting in part) — I concur with the majority that Cal Brown’s conviction should be affirmed. However, I would hold the trial court erred in admitting the testimony of Ms. Schnell, the victim in a criminal encounter with Brown in California. Further, I would hold the admission of that evidence was reversible error as to the sentencing phase of Defendant’s
State v. Freeburgpublic domain
Ellington, J. The chief issue in this case is whether evidence of possession of a weapon at the time of arrest was *495properly admitted as evidence of flight. Because we hold that in this case it was not, and constituted prejudicial error, we reverse and remand for a new trial. We also address the instructions on self-defense because use of the standard instructions may
State v. FREEBRUGpublic domain
20 P.3d 984 (2001) 105 Wash.App. 492 STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Scott Alan FREEBURG, Appellant. No. 44294-5-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. March 26, 2001. *986 Nancy P. Collins, Seattle, for Appellant. Roger Scott Davidheiser, Endel R. Kolde, Cynthia S.C. Gannett, Lee Davis