⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

9 opinions for “McCormick v. Davol, Inc.”

Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2008-10-27 · Published · cited 0×
DECISION Before this Court is Plaintiffs', Barbara Brokaw, Raymond Mutz, Tammy Oakley, and Delza Young, (Plaintiffs) Rule 37 motion to compel Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc. (collectively "Defendant") to produce a confidential audit report of their quality systems conducted by an outside consultant. At issue is whether Defendant may assert a previously unknown privilege — the self-critical analysis privil
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019-03-29 · Published · cited 35× · 372 F. Supp. 3d 1166
James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, filed March 23, 2018 (Doc. 27)("MTD"). The Court held a hearing on August 10, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether the applicable statutes of limitations bar Plaintiff Janice Nowell's claims against Defendants Medtronic Inc., Covidien PLC, Covidien LP, and Medtronic PLC for negligence, strict
District Court, D. Kansas · 2002-02-14 · Published · cited 4× · 191 F. Supp. 2d 1209; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2854; 2002 WL 398307
191 F.Supp.2d 1209 (2002) AEROTECH RESOURCES, INC., Plaintiff, v. DODSON AVIATION, INCORPORATED, Dodson International Parts, Inc., and Robert L. Dodson, a/k/a J.R. Dodson, Defendants. CIV. A. No. 00-2099-CM. United States District Court, D. Kansas. February 14, 2002. *1210 *1211 James W. Herro
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940-02-26 · Published · cited 26× · 305 Mass. 265; 25 N.E.2d 749; 128 A.L.R. 592; 1940 Mass. LEXIS 809
Lummus, J. The first action is brought for personal injuries by a woman who will be called the plaintiff. The second is brought by her husband for consequential damages. Each obtained a favorable verdict. There was evi*266dence that while attending the defendant’s theatre the plaintiff had occasion to go down stairs; that the carpet on the stairs, which was nearly half an inc
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024-08-14 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0178p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │
District Court, D. Kansas · 2001-11-29 · Published · cited 0× · 204 F.R.D. 476; 58 Fed. R. Serv. 1137; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20177; 2001 WL 1549329
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER VanBEBBER, Senior District Judge. Plaintiffs bring this case seeking relief for property and vehicle damage allegedly caused by discharge of sulphuric acid from a manufacturing plant, the Delphi plant, located near their property. Plaintiffs allege that the market value of their real property has fallen and that the exterior finishes of their vehicles have been damaged because of the
Geer v. Coxpublic domain
District Court, D. Kansas · 2003-08-20 · Published · cited 0× · 216 F.R.D. 677; 56 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 762; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14886; 2003 WL 22006290
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION ROBINSON, District Judge. In an “Amended Class Action and Derivative Complaint” (Doc. 120), plaintiff Lewis Geer, as a shareholder of TransFinancial Holdings, Inc. (“TransFinancial”), seeks to assert class and derivative causes of action concerning the liquidation sale of assets by Crouse Cartage Company (“Crouse”), a subsidiary of TransF
Sherman v. Giffordpublic domain
Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2009-08-21 · Published · cited 0×
DECISION Before this Court is an appeal by Aaron R. Sherman, M.D. ("Dr. Sherman") from a decision and order of the Rhode Island Board of Medical Licensure and Discipline ("Board"). After several hearings conducted from July 1, 2004 to February 8, 2006, the Board found Dr. Sherman guilty of five counts of "unprofessional conduct" in violation of G.L. 1956 § 5-37-5.1. The Board issue
District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1998-01-02 · Published · cited 1× · 993 F. Supp. 677; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8792; 1998 WL 53924
993 F.Supp. 677 (1998) Richard D. RASMUSSEN, Plaintiff, v. QUAKER CHEMICAL CORPORATION and Robert M. Lower, Defendants. No. C95-0351. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Cedar Rapids Division. January 2, 1998. *678 Wilford H. Stone, Susan H. Sibert, Lynch-Dallas-Smith-Harman, Cedar Rapids, for plaintiff.