Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
12 opinions for “McCollough v. Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company”
Nasca v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.public domain
12 P.3d 346 (2000) Todd NASCA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, Defendant-Appellant, and Zupkus & Ayd, P.C., a Colorado professional corporation; Robert Zupkus, individually; and Patricia M. Ayd, individually, Defendants. No. 99CA0510. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I. April 13, 2000. Certi
Penrose v. Commercial Travelers Insurance Co.public domain
*528THOMAS, Justice. Plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as respondent, instituted an action to recover monthly sick benefit payments under an insurance policy issued to him on November 15, 1945, by defendant, hereinafter referred to as appellant. The matter was tried before a jury. At the close of the evidence appellant made a motion for non-suit and respondent moved fo
Lair v. Murrypublic domain
ORDER and PERMANENT INJUNCTION. CHARLES C. LOVELL, Senior District Judge. The plaintiffs filed this lawsuit, challenging several of Montana’s campaign finance and election laws. The plaintiffs also moved for a preliminary injunction, which the Court granted in part and denied in part. The parties then agreed that some of the plaintiffs’ claims could be resolved by summary judgment and some would require f
Ray v. Chafetzpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Petitioner Susan Ray and Respondent Marc Chafetz are co-partners of the now-defunct Beltway Law Group LLP (“BLG”). Petitioner John Ray,, Ms. Ray’s ex-husband, is not formally a partner of BLG, but shares in the firm’s distributions. Shortly after Respondent joined BLG, irreconcilable
Pfeifer, J. {¶ 1} This case began with a default on credit-card debt by an Ohio consumer. It reaches this court because that consumer alleged violations of the federal Fan-Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. 1692 et seq., and the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act (“OCSPA”), R.C. 1345.01 et seq., by the entities that purchased her debt and were involved in suing her to collect on it. Today, we determine several
Simon v. FIA Card Services, N.A.public domain
OPINION ROSENTHAL, District Judge: This appeal arises out of the intersection of the Bankruptcy Code and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The issue is whether a debt collector’s letter and notice requesting an examination under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2004 and offering to settle a debt, sent in a pending bankruptcy in contemplation of an
Collins v. D.R. Horton, Inc.public domain
361 F.Supp.2d 1085 (2005) Julie E. COLLINS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. D.R. HORTON, INC., Defendant. No. CV-99-0330-PHX-ROS. United States District Court, D. Arizona. March 21, 2005. *1086 *1087 Lawrence Allen Katz, Esq., Monica Linn Goebel, Esq., Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaint
Mock v. Allenpublic domain
783 So.2d 828 (2000) Shellie MOCK, Jr. v. Dr. Robert ALLEN. 1980985. Supreme Court of Alabama. November 17, 2000. *829 Steven F. Schmitt and John G. Smith of Schmitt, Harper & Smith, P.C., Tallassee (rehearing brief filed by John G. Smith of Harper & Smith, P.C., Tallassee), for appellant. Norman E. Waldrop, Jr., a
in the Interest of v. G., Childrenpublic domain
ACCEPTED 04-14-00802-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 1/28/2015 6:59:36 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK EXHIBIT A Page 367 grades, and engaged in athletic activities. 544 S.W.2d 367 (Tex. 1976)
ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 4/2/2015 10
ACCEPTED 07-14-00405-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 2/18/2015 4:43:44 PM
In Re the Arbitration Between Trans Chemical Ltd. & China National MacHiney Import & Export Corp.public domain
978 F.Supp. 266 (1997) In the Matter of the ARBITRATION BETWEEN: TRANS CHEMICAL LIMITED, Petitioner, AND CHINA NATIONAL MACHINERY IMPORT AND EXPORT CORPORATION, Respondent. Civil Action Nos. H-95-4114, H-95-5553, H-96-0166. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. July 7, 1997. *267