Cases

LAMBERT, Chief Justice. The Jefferson County Fiscal Court appeals from the Court of Appeals’ denial of a writ of prohibition. CR 76.36(7). The Thurman/Ballard Company, a real estate development company, and the Estate of Samuel J. Stallings, owner of unde*918veloped land in Jefferson County, sought a zoning change for the undeveloped land. The Loui

559 S.W.2d 478 (1977) FISCAL COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, Kentucky, Appellant, v. CITY OF LOUISVILLE, Kentucky, et al., Appellees. CITY OF WINDY HILLS, Kentucky, Individually, etc., et al., Cross-Appellants, v. FISCAL COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, Kentucky, et al., Cross-Appellees. Bill BLANFORD, Cross-Appellant, v. FISCAL COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, Kentucky, et al., Cross-Appellees. CITY OF LOUISVILLE, Kentucky, Cross-Appe

225 S.W.3d 658 (2006) WEST TELEMARKETING CORPORATION OUTBOUND, Appellant, v. Victoria McCLURE, Appellee. No. 08-05-00166-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. October 19, 2006. Rehearing Overruled November 29, 2006. *661 Jane M.N. Webre, Scott, Douglass & McConnico, LLP, Austin, for appellant. John P

SILER, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. *903Initially, there is no general First Amendment right for the public to access criminal justice records. Lanphere & Urbaniak v. Cobrado, 21 F.3d 1508, 1512 (10th Cir.1994). The majority is correct in analyzing the statute under the test fr

168 F.3d 893 27 Media L. Rep. 1577 Stephen AMELKIN, Broadway Chiropractic; Dr. BrianChristopher Fee; Stuart Lyon; Nicolas Baker; DavidKaplan; James W. Chambers; Sidney Hanish; Rhoda Daniels;Thomas H. Watson; Kenneth W. Wall; James Bogard, doingbusiness as Bogard & Associates, Plaintiffs-Appellees,City of Louisville, Division of Police, Plaintiff,v.Ann McCLURE, Document Custodian;

OPINION GILMAN, Circuit Judge. A number of attorneys and chiropractors filed suit to challenge the constitutionality of two Kentucky statutes that restrict their access to accident reports filed with the Department of State Police. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment

COURT OF APPEALS COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS WEST TELEMARKETING CORPORATION ) OUTBOUND, )

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: This is a consolidated challenge to two orders of the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC,” the “Commission,” or the “agency”)1 promulgated to satisfy the twin Congressional mandates articulated in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the “Act”)2 of providing universal telecommunications service in the United States and injecting

Criminal Case Template COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS THOMAS JEFFERSON SOLOMON, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. § §

HESTER, Judge: Walter Mohney, Jr. appeals from the March 1, 1989 order entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Jefferson County granting summary judgment to appellee, Robert M. Hanak, on the issue of appellee’s liability as a corporate officer for the nonpayment of wages. Appellant contends that appellee, as secretary and corporate counsel for McClure Contracts, Inc. (“McClure”), is considered an employer liable for non-paym

WIENER, Circuit Judge: Defendants-Appellants, the public Ports of Beaumont, Port Arthur, and Orange (“Ports”), and Intervenor-Appellant the State of Texas (“State”), (collectively “Appellants”), appeal a district court order granting summary judgment in favor of Plaintiffs-Appellees the Sabine Pilots Association (“Pilots”), declaring that the second sentence of Article 8267(C)(5)

Mary Jane Trapp, Judge. {¶ 1} This case stems from the Cuyahoga County voters’ decision in November 2009 to abolish the county’s statutory form of government and replace it with a charter government. One of the plaintiffs below and the sole appellant in this appeal, Norman G. Lange, a Cuyahoga County voter, sued along with two other voters and then County Recorder, Judge Lillian

840 S.W.2d 205 (1992) DANVILLE-BOYLE COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, Movant, v. Thomas PRALL and Edna Prall, County of Boyle, Respondents. No. 91-SC-782-DG. Supreme Court of Kentucky. November 19, 1992. Elizabeth Nickels, Silliman, Dishman & Nickels, Danville, for movant. Helen C. Helton, Helton & Helton, Danville, for respondents, Pralls.

LESTER, Judge. On October 10,1978, the Franklin County Grand Jury charged Russell R. McClure with a violation of KRS 45.360(7) because of the manner in which he transferred two state vehicles. The indictment also charged Melvin Young with complicity, as proscribed by KRS 502.020, in connection with the transfer of one of the vehicles. From among the various grounds asserted by McClure and Young in their m

OPINION This appeal arises out of the trial court's denial of a Plea to the Jurisdiction and/or Motion to Dismiss. El Paso County appeals the trial court's ruling. Having found that compliance under Section 89.0041 of the Local Government Code is not jurisdictional, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction because there is no final judgment or otherwise appealable interlocutory order before the Court.

ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 4/2/2015 10

(2007) Donelle KEATON, Plaintiff, v. COBB COUNTY, Georgia, et al., Defendants. Civil Action File No. 1:06-CV-1438-RWS-AJB. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta. Division. February 19, 2007. ORDER RICHARD W. STORY, District Judge. This case is before the Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation [42] of Mag

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS EL PASO COUNTY, § No. 08-07-00351-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. §

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS EL PASO COUNTY, Appellant, v. HERLINDA ALVARADO, Appellee. § § </

BENTON, Circuit Judge. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and Richard W. Hopkins sued the city of Independence, Missouri, alleging constructive discharge and a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA). The district court granted summary judgment to the city on all counts. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.